Centro de Investigación Transdisciplinar en Psicología, Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca, México.
Br J Dev Psychol. 2014 Jun;32(2):163-77. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12029. Epub 2013 Dec 26.
Many have proposed that the acquisition of the cardinal principle (CP) is a result of the discovery of the numerical significance of the order of the number words in the count list. However, this need not be the case. Indeed, the CP does not state anything about the numerical significance of the order of the number words. It only states that the last word of a correct count denotes the numerosity of the counted set. Here, we test whether the acquisition of the CP involves the discovery of the later-greater principle - that is, that the order of the number words corresponds to the relative size of the numerosities they denote. Specifically, we tested knowledge of verbal numerical comparisons (e.g., Is 'ten' more than 'six'?) in children who had recently learned the CP. We find that these children can compare number words between 'six' and 'ten' only if they have mapped them onto non-verbal representations of numerosity. We suggest that this means that the acquisition of the CP does not involve the discovery of the correspondence between the order of the number words and the relative size of the numerosities they denote.
许多人认为基数原则(CP)的习得是发现数词在计数列表中顺序的数值意义的结果。然而,情况未必如此。实际上,CP 并没有说明数词顺序的数值意义。它只规定了正确计数的最后一个词表示被计数集合的数量。在这里,我们测试 CP 的习得是否涉及到后大原则的发现,即数词的顺序对应于它们表示的数量的相对大小。具体来说,我们测试了最近学习 CP 的儿童的口头数值比较(例如,“十”比“六”大吗?)的知识。我们发现,只有当这些孩子将数词映射到数量的非言语表示上时,他们才能在“六”和“十”之间比较数词。我们认为,这意味着 CP 的习得并不涉及发现数词顺序与它们所表示的数量的相对大小之间的对应关系。