Dubois Robert W, Feldman Marv, Lustig Adam, Kotzbauer Greg, Penso Jerry, Pope Scott D, Westrich Kimberly D
National Pharmaceutical Council, 1717 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Ste. 800, Washington, DC 20006, USA.
J Manag Care Pharm. 2014 Jan;20(1):17-21. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.1.17.
Accountable care organizations (ACOs) have the potential to lower costs and improve quality through incentives and coordinated care. However, the design brings with it many new challenges. One such challenge is the optimal use of pharmaceuticals. Most ACOs have not yet focused on this integral facet of care, even though medications are a critical component to achieving the lower costs and improved quality that are anticipated with this new model.
To evaluate whether ACOs are prepared to maximize the value of medications for achieving quality benchmarks and cost offsets.
During the fall of 2012, an electronic readiness self-assessment was developed using a portion of the questions and question methodology from the National Survey of Accountable Care Organizations, along with original questions developed by the authors. The assessment was tested and subsequently revised based on feedback from pilot testing with 5 ACO representatives. The revised assessment was distributed via e-mail to a convenience sample (n=175) of ACO members of the American Medical Group Association, Brookings-Dartmouth ACO Learning Network, and Premier Healthcare Alliance.
The self-assessment was completed by 46 ACO representatives (26% response rate). ACOs reported high readiness to manage medications in a few areas, such as transmitting prescriptions electronically (70%), being able to integrate medical and pharmacy data into a single database (54%), and having a formulary in place that encourages generic use when appropriate (50%). However, many areas have substantial room for improvement with few ACOs reporting high readiness. Some notable areas include being able to quantify the cost offsets and hence demonstrate the value of appropriate medication use (7%), notifying a physician when a prescription has been filled (9%), having protocols in place to avoid medication duplication and polypharmacy (17%), and having quality metrics in place for a broad diversity of conditions (22%).
Developing the capabilities to support, monitor, and ensure appropriate medication use will be critical to achieve optimal patient outcomes and ACO success. The ACOs surveyed have embarked upon an important journey towards this goal, but critical gaps remain before they can become fully accountable. While many of these organizations have begun adopting health information technologies that allow them to maximize the value of medications for achieving quality outcomes and cost offsets, a significant lag was identified in their inability to use these technologies to their full capacities. In order to provide further guidance, the authors have begun documenting case studies for public release that would provide ACOs with examples of how certain medication issues have been addressed by ACOs or relevant organizations. The authors hope that these case studies will help ACOs optimize the value of pharmaceuticals and achieve the "triple aim" of improving care, health, and cost.
accountable care organizations(ACO)有潜力通过激励措施和协调护理来降低成本并提高质量。然而,这种设计也带来了许多新挑战。其中一个挑战是药品的优化使用。尽管药物是实现新模式预期的降低成本和提高质量的关键组成部分,但大多数ACO尚未关注护理的这一重要方面。
评估ACO是否准备好最大化药物价值以实现质量基准和成本抵消。
2012年秋季,利用“全国ACO调查”的部分问题和提问方法以及作者编写的原始问题,开发了一项电子准备情况自我评估。该评估经过测试,并根据5位ACO代表的试点测试反馈进行了修订。修订后的评估通过电子邮件分发给美国医学集团协会、布鲁金斯 - 达特茅斯ACO学习网络和Premier Healthcare Alliance的ACO成员的便利样本(n = 175)。
46位ACO代表完成了自我评估(回复率26%)。ACO在一些领域报告了较高的管理药物准备情况,例如以电子方式传输处方(70%)、能够将医疗和药房数据整合到单个数据库(54%)以及有一个鼓励在适当情况下使用通用药物的处方集(50%)。然而,许多领域仍有很大的改进空间,很少有ACO报告高度准备就绪。一些值得注意的领域包括能够量化成本抵消并因此证明适当用药的价值(7%)、在处方配药时通知医生(9%)、有避免药物重复和多重用药的方案(17%)以及针对广泛的病症有质量指标(22%)。
发展支持、监测和确保适当用药的能力对于实现最佳患者结果和ACO的成功至关重要。接受调查的ACO已朝着这一目标踏上了重要征程,但在他们能够完全承担责任之前,关键差距仍然存在。虽然这些组织中的许多已经开始采用健康信息技术,使他们能够最大化药物价值以实现质量结果和成本抵消,但在无法充分利用这些技术方面发现了明显滞后。为了提供进一步的指导,作者已开始记录案例研究以供公开发布,这些案例研究将为ACO提供某些药物问题如何由ACO或相关组织解决的示例。作者希望这些案例研究将帮助ACO优化药物价值并实现改善护理、健康和成本的“三重目标”。