• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

台湾胆管癌中 EGFR、KRAS 和 BRAF 突变的临床病理和预后意义。

Clinicopathological and prognostic significances of EGFR, KRAS and BRAF mutations in biliary tract carcinomas in Taiwan.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 May;29(5):1119-25. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12505.

DOI:10.1111/jgh.12505
PMID:24372748
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Biliary tract carcinomas (BTCs) are difficult to diagnose and treat. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) represents a therapeutic target for the BTCs. Mutations of the EGFR gene and the activation of its downstream pathways, including KRAS and BRAF, predict the sensitivity to anti-EGFR treatment. The aims of this study were to analyze the EGFR, KRAS and BRAF mutations in BTCs and their association with clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Paraffin-embedded specimens containing 137 BTCs resected at the National Taiwan University Hospital between 1995 and 2004 were analyzed. The exons 18-21 of EGFR gene, the codon 12, 13 and 61 of KRAS gene, and BRAF V600E mutation were analyzed. We examined the correlation between these mutations and the overall survival, tumor location, stage, and differentiation in BTCs.

RESULTS

Thirteen (9.5%) BTC patients had EGFR mutations while 23 (16.8%) patients had KRAS mutations. Only one patient had BRAF mutation. Factors influencing survival on univariate analysis were tumor stage, tumor differentiation, and EGFR mutation. On multivariate analysis, EGFR mutation and tumor stage were independent prognostic factors. A correlation between KRAS or BRAF mutations and prognosis was not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

EGFR and KRAS mutations are not uncommon in BTCs. BRAF mutation is rare in BTCs. EGFR mutation was an independent prognostic marker in BTCs in addition to tumor stage and differentiation. No simultaneous EGFR and KRAS mutations in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma were found. EGFR and KRAS mutations should be evaluated when tailoring molecular-targeted therapy to patients with BTCs.

摘要

背景与目的

胆道癌(BTC)难以诊断和治疗。表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)是 BTC 的治疗靶点。EGFR 基因的突变及其下游途径(包括 KRAS 和 BRAF)的激活预测了抗 EGFR 治疗的敏感性。本研究旨在分析 BTC 中的 EGFR、KRAS 和 BRAF 突变及其与临床结果的关系。

方法

分析了 1995 年至 2004 年间在国立台湾大学医院切除的 137 例 BTC 石蜡包埋标本。分析了 EGFR 基因外显子 18-21、KRAS 基因密码子 12、13 和 61 以及 BRAF V600E 突变。我们检查了这些突变与 BTC 总生存率、肿瘤位置、分期和分化之间的相关性。

结果

13 例(9.5%)BTC 患者存在 EGFR 突变,23 例(16.8%)患者存在 KRAS 突变。仅 1 例患者存在 BRAF 突变。单因素分析影响生存的因素是肿瘤分期、肿瘤分化和 EGFR 突变。多因素分析显示,EGFR 突变和肿瘤分期是独立的预后因素。未观察到 KRAS 或 BRAF 突变与预后相关。

结论

EGFR 和 KRAS 突变在 BTC 中并不罕见。BTC 中 BRAF 突变罕见。除了肿瘤分期和分化外,EGFR 突变还是 BTC 的独立预后标志物。在肝外胆管癌和胆囊癌中未发现同时存在 EGFR 和 KRAS 突变。在为 BTC 患者制定分子靶向治疗方案时,应评估 EGFR 和 KRAS 突变情况。

相似文献

1
Clinicopathological and prognostic significances of EGFR, KRAS and BRAF mutations in biliary tract carcinomas in Taiwan.台湾胆管癌中 EGFR、KRAS 和 BRAF 突变的临床病理和预后意义。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 May;29(5):1119-25. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12505.
2
Molecular Characterization of KRAS, BRAF, and EGFR Genes in Cases with Prostatic Adenocarcinoma; Reporting Bioinformatics Description and Recurrent Mutations.前列腺腺癌病例中KRAS、BRAF和EGFR基因的分子特征;报告生物信息学描述和复发性突变
Clin Lab. 2015;61(7):749-59. doi: 10.7754/clin.lab.2014.141210.
3
Clinical pharmacogenomic testing of KRAS, BRAF and EGFR mutations by high resolution melting analysis and ultra-deep pyrosequencing.采用高分辨率熔解分析和超深度焦磷酸测序法进行 KRAS、BRAF 和 EGFR 基因突变的临床药物基因组学检测。
BMC Cancer. 2011 Sep 24;11:406. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-406.
4
BRAF V600E mutation and KRAS codon 13 mutations predict poor survival in Chinese colorectal cancer patients.BRAF V600E突变和KRAS密码子13突变预示中国结直肠癌患者的生存期较差。
BMC Cancer. 2014 Nov 3;14:802. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-802.
5
[Detection of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and EGFR gene mutations in colorectal carcinoma].[结直肠癌中KRAS、BRAF、PIK3CA和EGFR基因突变的检测]
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2012 Sep;41(9):590-4. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2012.09.004.
6
EGFR status and KRAS/BRAF mutations in intestinal-type sinonasal adenocarcinomas.肠型鼻-鼻窦腺癌中的 EGFR 状态和 KRAS/BRAF 突变。
Cell Oncol (Dordr). 2012 Dec;35(6):443-50. doi: 10.1007/s13402-012-0103-7. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
7
Mutational analysis of the BRAF, RAS and EGFR genes in human adrenocortical carcinomas.人类肾上腺皮质癌中BRAF、RAS和EGFR基因的突变分析。
Endocr Relat Cancer. 2009 Jun;16(2):565-72. doi: 10.1677/ERC-08-0101. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
8
KRAS and BRAF mutations in 203 esophageal squamous cell carcinomas: pyrosequencing technology and literature review.203 例食管鳞癌中 KRAS 和 BRAF 基因突变:焦磷酸测序技术及文献复习。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Dec;20 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S485-91. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2819-z. Epub 2012 Dec 30.
9
[Mutations of KRAS and BRAF in Chinese patients with colorectal carcinoma: analyses of 966 cases].[中国结直肠癌患者KRAS和BRAF基因的突变:966例病例分析]
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2012 Sep;41(9):579-83. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2012.09.002.
10
[Comparative analysis of real-time quantitative PCR-Sanger sequencing method and TaqMan probe method for detection of KRAS/BRAF mutation in colorectal carcinomas].实时定量PCR-桑格测序法与TaqMan探针法检测结直肠癌KRAS/BRAF突变的比较分析
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Feb;43(2):77-82.

引用本文的文献

1
EGFR, HER2, and MET gene amplification and protein expression profiles in biliary tract cancer and their prognostic significance.胆道癌中 EGFR、HER2 和 MET 基因扩增和蛋白表达谱及其预后意义。
Oncologist. 2024 Aug 5;29(8):e1051-e1060. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae076.
2
Molecular Targets and Signaling Pathways in Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review.胆管癌的分子靶点和信号通路:系统评价。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Mar 1;24(3):741-751. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.3.741.
3
Postoperative Prognostic Predictors of Bile Duct Cancers: Clinical Analysis and Immunoassays of Tissue Microarrays.
胆管癌的术后预后预测因子:组织微阵列的临床分析和免疫测定。
Gut Liver. 2023 Jan 15;17(1):159-169. doi: 10.5009/gnl220044. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
4
Targeted Therapies for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.肝门部胆管癌的靶向治疗
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 31;14(7):1789. doi: 10.3390/cancers14071789.
5
The new insight of treatment in Cholangiocarcinoma.胆管癌治疗的新见解。
J Cancer. 2022 Jan 1;13(2):450-464. doi: 10.7150/jca.68264. eCollection 2022.
6
Gallbladder Cancer: Current Insights in Genetic Alterations and Their Possible Therapeutic Implications.胆囊癌:基因改变的当前见解及其可能的治疗意义
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Oct 20;13(21):5257. doi: 10.3390/cancers13215257.
7
ErBb Family Proteins in Cholangiocarcinoma and Clinical Implications.胆管癌中的ErBb家族蛋白及其临床意义。
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 16;9(7):2255. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072255.
8
Biliary tract cancers: current knowledge, clinical candidates and future challenges.胆道癌:当前认知、临床候选因素及未来挑战
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Mar 29;11:2623-2642. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S157092. eCollection 2019.
9
Radiomics and radiogenomics of primary liver cancers.原发性肝癌的影像组学和放射组学。
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2019 Mar;25(1):21-29. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2018.1007. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
10
An Increased Chromosome 7 Copy Number in Endoscopic Bile Duct Biopsy Specimens Is Predictive of a Poor Prognosis in Cholangiocarcinoma.内镜下胆管活检标本中染色体 7 拷贝数增加预示着胆管癌预后不良。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Dec;63(12):3376-3381. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5280-4. Epub 2018 Sep 12.