• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ICU 活动量表的可行性和组内信度。

Feasibility and inter-rater reliability of the ICU Mobility Scale.

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Heart Lung. 2014 Jan-Feb;43(1):19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2013.11.003. Epub 2013 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2013.11.003
PMID:24373338
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to develop a scale for measuring the highest level of mobility in adult ICU patients and to assess its feasibility and inter-rater reliability.

BACKGROUND

Growing evidence supports the feasibility, safety and efficacy of early mobilization in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, there are no adequately validated tools to quickly, easily, and reliably describe the mobility milestones of adult patients in ICU. Identifying or developing such a tool is a priority for evaluating mobility and rehabilitation activities for research and clinical care purposes.

METHODS

This study was performed at two ICUs in Australia. Thirty ICU nursing, and physiotherapy staff assessed the feasibility of the 'ICU Mobility Scale' (IMS) using a 10-item questionnaire. The inter-rater reliability of the IMS was assessed by 2 junior physical therapists, 2 senior physical therapists, and 16 nursing staff in 100 consecutive medical, surgical or trauma ICU patients.

RESULTS

An 11 point IMS scale was developed based on multidisciplinary input. Participating clinicians reported that the scale was clear, with 95% of respondents reporting that it took <1 min to complete. The junior and senior physical therapists showed the highest inter-rater reliability with a weighted Kappa (95% confidence interval) of 0.83 (0.76-0.90), while the senior physical therapists and nurses and the junior physical therapists and nurses had a weighted Kappa of 0.72 (0.61-0.83) and 0.69 (0.56-0.81) respectively.

CONCLUSION

The IMS is a feasible tool with strong inter-rater reliability for measuring the maximum level of mobility of adult patients in the ICU.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在开发一种测量成人 ICU 患者最高移动水平的量表,并评估其可行性和评分者间信度。

背景

越来越多的证据支持 ICU 中早期活动的可行性、安全性和有效性。然而,目前尚无经过充分验证的工具可快速、简便、可靠地描述 ICU 成人患者的移动里程碑。确定或开发此类工具是评估移动性和康复活动以用于研究和临床护理目的的当务之急。

方法

该研究在澳大利亚的 2 家 ICU 进行。30 名 ICU 护理和物理治疗人员使用 10 项问卷评估“ICU 移动量表(IMS)”的可行性。2 名初级物理治疗师、2 名高级物理治疗师和 16 名护理人员对 100 例连续的内科、外科或创伤 ICU 患者进行了 IMS 的评分者间信度评估。

结果

根据多学科的意见制定了 11 分 IMS 量表。参与临床医生报告称,该量表清晰易懂,95%的受访者报告称完成量表评估不到 1 分钟。初级和高级物理治疗师的评分者间信度最高,加权 Kappa(95%置信区间)为 0.83(0.76-0.90),而高级物理治疗师和护士以及初级物理治疗师和护士的加权 Kappa 分别为 0.72(0.61-0.83)和 0.69(0.56-0.81)。

结论

IMS 是一种可行的工具,具有较强的评分者间信度,可用于测量 ICU 成人患者的最大移动水平。

相似文献

1
Feasibility and inter-rater reliability of the ICU Mobility Scale.ICU 活动量表的可行性和组内信度。
Heart Lung. 2014 Jan-Feb;43(1):19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2013.11.003. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
2
Feasibility and Inter-rater Reliability of the Japanese Version of the Intensive Care Unit Mobility Scale.《重症监护病房活动量表日语版的可行性及评分者间信度》
Cureus. 2024 Apr 27;16(4):e59135. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59135. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Perme ICU Mobility Score (Perme Score) and the ICU Mobility Scale (IMS): translation and cultural adaptation for the Spanish language.佩尔梅重症监护病房活动能力评分(佩尔梅评分)与重症监护病房活动量表(IMS):西班牙语翻译及文化调适
Colomb Med (Cali). 2018 Dec 30;49(4):265-272. doi: 10.25100/cm.v49i3.4042.
4
A tool to assess mobility status in critically ill patients: the Perme Intensive Care Unit Mobility Score.一种评估重症患者活动状态的工具:珀米重症监护病房活动评分
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2014 Jan-Mar;10(1):41-9. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-10-1-41.
5
Inter-rater reliability of the Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility Scale (JH-HLM) in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房中约翰霍普金斯最高活动能力量表(JH-HLM)的评定者间信度。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2021 May-Jun;25(3):352-355. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.07.010. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
6
Validity, inter-rater reliability, and feasibility of the Chelsea Physical Assessment Tool for assessing physical function in post-acute COVID-19 patients: A cross-sectional study.《切尔西身体评估工具评估 COVID-19 后康复期患者身体功能的有效性、评分者间信度和可行性:一项横断面研究》。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2023;36(3):527-539. doi: 10.3233/BMR-220191.
7
[Diagnostic tools of intensive care unit acquired weakness: a systematic review].[重症监护病房获得性肌无力的诊断工具:一项系统综述]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Dec;30(12):1154-1160. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.012.011.
8
Level of function mobility scale for nurse-driven early mobilisation in people with acute cardiovascular disease.护士主导的急性心血管病患者早期活动功能移动量表
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Mar;29(5-6):778-784. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15124. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
9
Toward a Common Language for Measuring Patient Mobility in the Hospital: Reliability and Construct Validity of Interprofessional Mobility Measures.用于测量医院患者移动能力的通用语言:跨专业移动能力测量的信度和结构效度。
Phys Ther. 2018 Feb 1;98(2):133-142. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzx110.
10
Evaluating pain, sedation, and delirium in the neurologically critically ill-feasibility and reliability of standardized tools: a multi-institutional study.评估神经危重症患者的疼痛、镇静和谵妄:标准化工具的可行性和可靠性:一项多机构研究。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Aug;41(8):2002-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828e96c0.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of Early Mobilization in Post-CABG Patients: A Constructivist Grounded Theory Study.冠状动脉搭桥术后患者早期活动的实施:一项建构主义扎根理论研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Aug 30;19:2697-2709. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S537861. eCollection 2025.
2
The Construct and Predictive Validity of the Japanese Version of the Intensive Care Unit Mobility Scale.《重症监护病房活动量表日语版的结构效度和预测效度》
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 18;14(16):5843. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165843.
3
Early Sitting Improves the Accuracy of Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Older Adult Patients With Pneumonia.
早期坐立可提高老年肺炎患者院内死亡率预测的准确性。
Cureus. 2025 May 28;17(5):e84952. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84952. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Changes in Physical Function, Cognitive Function, Mental Health, and Sleep Quality After Cardiac Surgeries and Procedures.心脏手术及相关操作后身体功能、认知功能、心理健康和睡眠质量的变化。
Nurs Rep. 2025 Jun 11;15(6):209. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15060209.
5
Exploring Peripheral and Respiratory Muscle Weakness and Functional Impairments in ICU Patients: Insights From a Resource-Constrained Setting.探索重症监护病房患者的外周和呼吸肌无力及功能障碍:来自资源有限环境的见解。
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Mar 26;7(4):e1245. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001245. eCollection 2025 Apr 1.
6
Investigating the safety of physical rehabilitation with critically ill patients receiving vasoactive drugs: An exploratory observational feasibility study.调查接受血管活性药物治疗的重症患者进行物理康复的安全性:一项探索性观察性可行性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 13;20(2):e0318150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318150. eCollection 2025.
7
Experience in Rehabilitation Treatment for Patients Repeatedly Admitted to Intensive Care Units After Dual Graft Living-Donor Liver Transplantation: A Case Report.双供体活体肝移植后多次入住重症监护病房患者的康复治疗经验:一例报告
Cureus. 2025 Jan 7;17(1):e77099. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77099. eCollection 2025 Jan.
8
Association Between Early Mobilization and Postoperative Pneumonia Following Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Patients with Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.胸段食管鳞状细胞癌患者机器人辅助微创食管切除术后早期活动与术后肺炎的相关性
Phys Ther Res. 2024;27(3):121-127. doi: 10.1298/ptr.E10293. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
9
Outcome Measures to Evaluate Functional Recovery in Survivors of Respiratory Failure: A Scoping Review.评估呼吸衰竭幸存者功能恢复的结局指标:一项范围综述
CHEST Crit Care. 2024 Sep;2(3). doi: 10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100084. Epub 2024 May 31.
10
Evaluating optimal rehabilitation strategies in ICU: study protocol for a multicentre cohort study to assess Physical Activity dosing, Muscle mass, and physICal outcomeS (IPAMICS study).评估重症监护病房中的最佳康复策略:一项多中心队列研究的研究方案,以评估体力活动剂量、肌肉质量和身体结局(IPAMICS研究)
Ann Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Sep 4;6(4):97-105. doi: 10.37737/ace.24014. eCollection 2024 Oct 1.