Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, 1205 Beal Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Department of Health Care Sciences, Wayne State University, 259 Mack Avenue, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Neurosci Lett. 2014 Feb 21;561:208-12. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.12.041. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
Although controversial, muscular effort perception is frequently attributed to the efferent copy of the associated motor command. While peripheral/sensory information is thought to be necessary for force modulation/control, it is not involved in initial force production. We recently showed in right-handers, that perception of effort was asymmetric for grasp-force tasks. This asymmetry was related to individual differences in right and left hand strength and an intrinsic component. A difference in gain (input/output magnitude relationship) for each limb/hemisphere system was proposed as the mechanism explaining intrinsic asymmetries. To further investigate the relative contributions of efferent copy and sensory feedback to the sense of effort, vibration was used to distort sensory information from the muscles providing the reference force. Visual feedback (vision) of the reference hand force was also manipulated. The absolute error (AE) was generally larger in the vision than no-vision condition and the influence of reference hand vibration was significant for left hand matching of the right hand reference force. However, this effect was negligible when matching in the reverse condition. These two results may reflect an interaction between two phenomena: (1) visual feedback, which represents the total output force may not be congruent with the internal representation of effort associated with the efferent copy and eventually the proprioceptive feedback; and (2) a vibration-induced larger AE for left than right hand contralateral matching indicates that the contribution of proprioceptive feedback to force matching is significant for the left but not the right hand/hemisphere system. Overall, it may be suggested that in right-handers, the sense of effort associated with the right hand may be primarily based on the efferent copy while the left hand/hemisphere system may use a combination of efferent copy and proprioceptive feedback. However, the weight of each type of information may depend on the association between motor command and representation of the execution of the motor command (visual vs. internal).
虽然存在争议,但肌肉用力感知通常归因于相关运动指令的传出副本。虽然外围/感觉信息对于力的调节/控制是必要的,但它不参与初始力的产生。我们最近在右利手者中显示,抓握力任务的用力感知存在不对称性。这种不对称性与右手和左手力量的个体差异以及内在成分有关。提出了每个肢体/半球系统的增益(输入/输出幅度关系)差异作为解释内在不对称性的机制。为了进一步研究传出副本和感觉反馈对用力感知的相对贡献,使用振动来扭曲提供参考力的肌肉的感觉信息。还操纵了参考手力的视觉反馈(视觉)。在视觉条件下,绝对误差(AE)通常大于无视觉条件,并且参考手振动对左手匹配右手参考力的影响显著。然而,当在相反条件下进行匹配时,这种效果可以忽略不计。这两个结果可能反映了两种现象之间的相互作用:(1)视觉反馈代表总输出力,可能与与传出副本相关的用力内部表示以及最终的本体感受反馈不一致;(2)振动引起的左手对右手的对侧匹配的 AE 大于右手,这表明本体感受反馈对力匹配的贡献对于左手但不是右手/半球系统很重要。总体而言,可以认为在右利手者中,与右手相关的用力感知可能主要基于传出副本,而左手/半球系统可能同时使用传出副本和本体感受反馈的组合。然而,每种类型信息的权重可能取决于运动指令和运动指令执行的表示之间的关联(视觉与内部)。