Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary , Calgary, Alberta , Canada.
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, Calgary , Canada.
J Neurophysiol. 2019 Feb 1;121(2):459-470. doi: 10.1152/jn.00346.2018. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
Proprioception encompasses our sense of position and movement of our limbs, as well as the effort with which we engage in voluntary actions. Historically, sense of effort has been linked to centrally generated signals that elicit voluntary movements. We were interested in determining the effect of differences in limb geometry and personal control on sense of effort. In experiment 1, subjects exerted either extension or flexion torques to resist a torque applied by a robot exoskeleton to their reference elbow. They attempted to match this torque by exerting an equal effort torque (in a congruent direction with the reference arm) with their opposite (matching) arm in different limb positions (±15°). Subjects produced greater matching torque when their matching arm exerted effort toward the mirrored position of the reference (e.g., reference/matching arms at 90°/105° elbow flexion) vs. away (e.g., 90°/75° flexion). In experiment 2, a larger angular difference between arms (30°) resulted in a larger discrepancy in matched torques. Furthermore, in both experiments 1 and 2, subjects tended to overestimate the reference arm torque. This motivated a third experiment to determine whether providing more personal control might influence perceived effort and reduce the overestimation of the reference torques that we observed ( experiments 3a and 3b). Overestimation of the matched torques decreased significantly when subjects self-selected the reference torque that they were matching. Collectively, our data suggest that perceived effort between arms can be influenced by signals relating to the relative geometry of the limbs and the personal control of motor output during action. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This work highlights how limb geometry influences our sense of effort during voluntary motor actions. It also suggests that loss of personal control during motor actions leads to an increase in perceived effort.
本体感觉包括我们四肢的位置和运动感觉,以及我们进行自主运动的用力感觉。从历史上看,用力感觉与中枢产生的信号有关,这些信号会引起自主运动。我们感兴趣的是确定肢体几何形状和个人控制的差异对用力感觉的影响。在实验 1 中,受试者施加伸展或弯曲扭矩以抵抗机器人外骨骼施加到其参考肘部的扭矩。他们试图通过用相反的(匹配的)手臂在不同的肢体位置(±15°)施加相等的用力扭矩(与参考臂方向一致)来匹配这个扭矩。当匹配的手臂向参考臂的镜像位置(例如,参考/匹配手臂在 90°/105°肘部弯曲)施加力时,受试者产生了更大的匹配扭矩,而不是远离(例如,90°/75°弯曲)。在实验 2 中,手臂之间的角度差较大(30°)导致匹配扭矩的差异较大。此外,在实验 1 和 2 中,受试者往往会高估参考臂的扭矩。这促使进行了第三个实验,以确定提供更多的个人控制是否会影响感知的用力并减少我们观察到的参考扭矩的高估(实验 3a 和 3b)。当受试者自行选择要匹配的参考扭矩时,匹配扭矩的高估显著降低。总的来说,我们的数据表明,手臂之间的感知用力可以受到与肢体相对几何形状和动作过程中运动输出的个人控制相关的信号的影响。这项工作强调了肢体几何形状如何影响我们在自愿运动动作期间的用力感觉。它还表明,运动动作过程中个人控制的丧失会导致感知用力的增加。