Patrick J. Denard, 2780 E Barnett Rd, Suite 200, Medford, OR 97530, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;42(2):457-62. doi: 10.1177/0363546513516602. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
Poor-quality tendon is one of the most difficult problems the surgeon must overcome in achieving secure fixation during rotator cuff repair. A load-sharing rip-stop construct (LSRS) has recently been proposed as a method for improving fixation strength, but the biomechanical properties of this construct have not yet been examined.
To compare the strength of the LSRS construct to that of single-row fixation for rotator cuff repair.
Controlled laboratory study.
Rotator cuff tears were created in 6 cadaveric matched-pair specimens and repaired with a single row or an LSRS. In the LSRS repair, a 2-mm suture tape was placed as an inverted mattress stitch in the rotator cuff, and sutures from 2 anchors were placed as simple stitches that passed medial to the suture tape. The suture tape limbs were secured with knotless anchors laterally before sutures were tied from the medial anchors. Displacement was observed with video tracking after cyclic loading, and specimens were loaded to failure.
The mean load to failure was 371 ± 102 N in single-row repairs compared with 616 ± 185 N in LSRS repairs (P = .031). There was no difference in displacement with cyclic loading between the groups (3.3 ± 0.8 mm vs. 3.5 ± 1.1 mm; P = .561). In the single-row group, 4 of 6 failures occurred at the suture-tendon interface. In the LSRS group, only 1 failure occurred at the suture-tendon interface.
The ultimate failure load of the LSRS construct for rotator cuff repair was 1.7 times that of a single-row construct in a cadaveric model.
The LSRS rotator cuff repair construct may be useful in the repair of difficult tears such as massive tears, medial tears, and tears with tendon loss.
在肩袖修复过程中,质量差的肌腱是外科医生必须克服的最困难的问题之一。一种负荷分担防裂构造(LSRS)最近被提议作为一种提高固定强度的方法,但这种构造的生物力学性能尚未得到检验。
比较 LSRS 构造与单排固定在肩袖修复中的强度。
对照实验室研究。
在 6 个尸体配对标本中创建肩袖撕裂,并使用单排或 LSRS 进行修复。在 LSRS 修复中,将 2 毫米缝线带作为反向褥式缝线放置在肩袖中,并且来自 2 个锚的缝线作为简单缝线穿过缝线带的内侧。缝线带的肢体在缝线从内侧锚固定之前用无结锚固定在外侧。在循环加载后通过视频跟踪观察位移,然后将标本加载至失效。
单排修复的平均失效负载为 371 ± 102 N,而 LSRS 修复的为 616 ± 185 N(P =.031)。两组之间循环加载时的位移没有差异(3.3 ± 0.8 毫米与 3.5 ± 1.1 毫米;P =.561)。在单排组中,6 个标本中有 4 个失效发生在缝线-肌腱界面。在 LSRS 组中,只有 1 个失效发生在缝线-肌腱界面。
在尸体模型中,LSRS 肩袖修复构造的最终失效负载是单排构造的 1.7 倍。
LSRS 肩袖修复构造可能对困难撕裂(如巨大撕裂、内侧撕裂和肌腱缺失撕裂)的修复有用。