Suppr超能文献

人体尸体模型中标准与连锁单排肩袖修复的生物力学比较

Biomechanical Comparison of Standard and Linked Single-Row Rotator Cuff Repairs in a Human Cadaver Model.

作者信息

Meisel Adam F, Henninger Heath B, Barber F Alan, Getelman Mark H

机构信息

Southern California Orthopedic Institute, Van Nuys, California, U.S.A.

Departments of Orthopaedics and Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.A.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2017 May;33(5):938-944. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.10.014. Epub 2017 Jan 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the time zero cyclic and failure loading properties of a linked single-row rotator cuff repair compared with a standard simple suture single-row repair using triple-loaded suture anchors.

METHODS

Eighteen human cadaveric shoulders from 9 matched pairs were dissected, and full-thickness supraspinatus tears were created. The tendon cross-sectional area was recorded. In each pair, one side was repaired with a linked single-row construct and the other with a simple suture single-row construct, both using 2 triple-loaded suture anchors. After preloading, specimens were cycled to 1 MPa of effective stress at 1 Hz for 500 cycles, and gap formation was recorded with a digital video system. Samples were then loaded to failure, and modes of failure were recorded.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in peak gap formation between the control and linked constructs (3.6 ± 0.9 mm and 3.6 ± 1.2 mm, respectively; P = .697). Both constructs averaged below a 5-mm cyclic failure threshold. There was no statistical difference in ultimate load to failure between the control and linked repair (511.1 ± 139.0 N and 561.2 ± 131.8 N, respectively; P = .164), and both groups reached failure at loads similar to previous studies. Constructs failed predominantly via tissue tearing parallel to the medial suture line.

CONCLUSIONS

The linked repair performed similarly to the simple single-row repair. Both constructs demonstrated high ultimate load to failure and good resistance to gap formation with cyclic loading, validating the time zero strength of both constructs in a human cadaveric model.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The linked repair provided equivalent resistance to gap formation and failure loads compared with simple suture single-row repairs with triple-loaded suture anchors. This suggests that the linked repair is a simplified rip-stop configuration using the existing suture that may perform similarly to current rotator cuff repair techniques.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估使用三联负载缝线锚钉的链式单排肩袖修复术与标准简单缝线单排修复术在零时循环和失效加载特性方面的差异。

方法

对来自9对匹配供体的18具人体尸体肩部进行解剖,制造全层冈上肌撕裂伤,并记录肌腱横截面积。在每对肩部中,一侧采用链式单排结构修复,另一侧采用简单缝线单排结构修复,均使用2个三联负载缝线锚钉。预加载后,将标本在1Hz频率下循环加载至有效应力1MPa,持续500个循环,并用数字视频系统记录间隙形成情况。然后将样本加载至失效,并记录失效模式。

结果

对照组与链式结构之间在峰值间隙形成上无统计学差异(分别为3.6±0.9mm和3.6±1.2mm;P = 0.697)。两种结构的平均间隙均低于5mm的循环失效阈值。对照组与链式修复之间在最终失效载荷上无统计学差异(分别为511.1±139.0N和561.2±131.8N;P = 0.164),且两组在与先前研究相似的载荷下达到失效。结构失效主要通过平行于内侧缝线的组织撕裂。

结论

链式修复与简单单排修复的表现相似。两种结构均表现出较高的最终失效载荷以及良好的抗循环加载间隙形成能力,在人体尸体模型中验证了两种结构的零时强度。

临床意义

与使用三联负载缝线锚钉的简单缝线单排修复相比,链式修复在抗间隙形成和失效载荷方面具有同等能力。这表明链式修复是一种使用现有缝线的简化防撕裂结构,其性能可能与当前的肩袖修复技术相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验