Kim Hye Sook, Sung Jae Sook, Yang Song-Ju, Kwon Nak-Jung, Jin LiHua, Kim Seung Tae, Park Kyong Hwa, Shin Sang Won, Kim Han Kyeom, Kang Jin-Hyoung, Kim Jeong-Oh, Park Jae Yong, Choi Jin Eun, Yoon HyoungKyu, Park Chan Kwon, Yang Kap-Seok, Seo Jeong-Sun, Kim Yeul Hong
Division of Oncology/Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
Cancer Research Institute, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 20;8(12):e81975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081975. eCollection 2013.
Direct sequencing remains the most widely used method for the detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in lung cancer; however, its relatively low sensitivity limits its clinical use. The objective of this study was to investigate the sensitivity of detecting an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation from peptide nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid polymerase chain reaction (PNA-LNA PCR) clamp and Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine (PGM) techniques compared to that by direct sequencing. Furthermore, the predictive efficacy of EGFR mutations detected by PNA-LNA PCR clamp was evaluated. EGFR mutational status was assessed by direct sequencing, PNA-LNA PCR clamp, and Ion Torrent PGM in 57 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated the predictive efficacy of PNA-LNA PCR clamp on the EGFR-TKI treatment in 36 patients with advanced NSCLC retrospectively. Compared to direct sequencing (16/57, 28.1%), PNA-LNA PCR clamp (27/57, 47.4%) and Ion Torrent PGM (26/57, 45.6%) detected more EGFR mutations. EGFR mutant patients had significantly longer progressive free survival (14.31 vs. 21.61 months, P = 0.003) than that of EGFR wild patients when tested with PNA-LNA PCR clamp. However, no difference in response rate to EGFR TKIs (75.0% vs. 82.4%, P = 0.195) or overall survival (34.39 vs. 44.10 months, P = 0.422) was observed between the EGFR mutations by direct sequencing or PNA-LNA PCR clamp. Our results demonstrate firstly that patients with EGFR mutations were detected more frequently by PNA-LNA PCR clamp and Ion Torrent PGM than those by direct sequencing. EGFR mutations detected by PNA-LNA PCR clamp may be as a predicative factor for EGFR TKI response in patients with NSCLC.
直接测序仍然是检测肺癌中表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变最广泛使用的方法;然而,其相对较低的灵敏度限制了它的临床应用。本研究的目的是调查与直接测序相比,从肽核酸-锁核酸聚合酶链反应(PNA-LNA PCR)钳夹和Ion Torrent个人基因组测序仪(PGM)技术检测表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的灵敏度。此外,还评估了通过PNA-LNA PCR钳夹检测到的EGFR突变的预测效力。采用直接测序、PNA-LNA PCR钳夹和Ion Torrent PGM对57例非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的EGFR突变状态进行评估。我们回顾性评估了PNA-LNA PCR钳夹对36例晚期NSCLC患者EGFR-TKI治疗的预测效力。与直接测序(16/57,28.1%)相比,PNA-LNA PCR钳夹(27/57,47.4%)和Ion Torrent PGM(26/57,45.6%)检测到更多的EGFR突变。当用PNA-LNA PCR钳夹检测时,EGFR突变患者的无进展生存期明显长于EGFR野生型患者(14.31对21.61个月,P = 0.003)。然而,直接测序或PNA-LNA PCR钳夹检测到的EGFR突变患者对EGFR TKIs的反应率(75.0%对82.4%,P = 0.195)或总生存期(34.39对44.10个月,P = 0.422)没有差异。我们的结果首先表明,与直接测序相比,PNA-LNA PCR钳夹和Ion Torrent PGM检测到EGFR突变的患者更频繁。通过PNA-LNA PCR钳夹检测到的EGFR突变可能是NSCLC患者EGFR TKI反应的一个预测因素。