Suppr超能文献

肽核酸钳夹法与直接测序法在非小细胞肺癌患者表皮生长因子受体基因突变检测中的比较

Peptide Nucleic Acid Clamping Versus Direct Sequencing for the Detection of EGFR Gene Mutation in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

作者信息

Yoon Seong-Hoon, Choi Yoo-Duk, Oh In-Jae, Kim Kyu-Sik, Choi Hayoung, Chang Jinsun, Shin Hong-Joon, Park Cheol-Kyu, Kim Young-Chul

机构信息

Lung and Esophageal Cancer Clinic, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.

出版信息

Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Oct;47(4):661-9. doi: 10.4143/crt.2014.282. Epub 2015 Feb 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Direct sequencing (DS) is the standard method for detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, low detection sensitivity is a problem. The aim of this study is to demonstrate higher detection rate of EGFR gene mutation with peptide nucleic acid (PNA) clamping compared with DS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a single arm, prospective study for patients with stage IIIB/IV or relapsed NSCLC. Using tumor DNA from 138 patients, both DS and PNA clamping for EGFR gene in exon 18, 19, 20, and 21 were performed. Discrepant results between the two methods were verified using Cobas and a mutant enrichment based next generation sequencing (NGS). Patients with activating mutations were treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI, gefitinib, or erlotinib) as first line treatment.

RESULTS

Of 138 paired test sets, 24 (17.4%) and 45 (32.6%) cases with activating mutations were detected by DS and PNA clamping, respectively. The difference of detection rate between the two methods was 15.2% (95% confidence interval, 8.7% to 17.8%; p < 0.001). Between the two methods, 25 cases showed discrepant results (n=23, PNA+/DS-; n=2, PNA-/DS+). Mutations were confirmed by Cobas or NGS in 22 of 23 PNA+/DS- cases. The response rates to EGFR-TKI were 72.2% in the PNA+/DS+ group and 85.0% in the PNA+/DS- group.

CONCLUSION

PNA clamping showed a significantly higher detection rate of EGFR gene mutation compared with DS. Higher sensitivity of PNA clamping was not compromised by the loss of predictive power of response to EGFR-TKI.

摘要

目的

直接测序(DS)是检测非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)基因突变的标准方法;然而,检测灵敏度低是一个问题。本研究的目的是证明与DS相比,肽核酸(PNA)钳夹法检测EGFR基因突变的检出率更高。

材料与方法

这是一项针对IIIB/IV期或复发NSCLC患者的单臂前瞻性研究。使用138例患者的肿瘤DNA,对第18、19、20和21外显子的EGFR基因进行DS和PNA钳夹检测。两种方法之间的差异结果使用Cobas和基于突变富集的下一代测序(NGS)进行验证。有激活突变的患者接受EGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKI,吉非替尼或厄洛替尼)作为一线治疗。

结果

在138对检测组中,DS和PNA钳夹分别检测到24例(17.4%)和45例(32.6%)有激活突变的病例。两种方法的检出率差异为15.2%(95%置信区间,8.7%至17.8%;p<0.001)。两种方法之间,有25例结果不一致(n=23,PNA+/DS-;n=2,PNA-/DS+)。23例PNA+/DS-病例中的22例通过Cobas或NGS确认了突变。PNA+/DS+组对EGFR-TKI的反应率为72.2%,PNA+/DS-组为85.0%。

结论

与DS相比,PNA钳夹法显示出显著更高的EGFR基因突变检出率。PNA钳夹法更高的灵敏度并未因对EGFR-TKI反应的预测能力丧失而受到影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4925/4614223/8760593acf0d/crt-2014-282f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验