• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Validity and reliability of using a self-lavaging device for cytology and HPV testing for cervical cancer screening: findings from a pilot study.使用自采装置进行宫颈癌筛查的细胞学和人乳头瘤病毒检测的有效性和可靠性:一项试点研究的结果
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 20;8(12):e82115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082115. eCollection 2013.
2
The clinician's view: role of human papillomavirus testing in the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cytology and cervical cancer precursors.临床医生的观点:人乳头瘤病毒检测在美国阴道镜及宫颈病理学会异常宫颈细胞学和宫颈癌前病变管理指南中的作用
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003 Aug;127(8):950-8. doi: 10.5858/2003-127-950-TCVROH.
3
Diagnosis of Cervical Precancers by Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy of Women With Abnormal Cervical Cytology.通过宫颈管刮术对宫颈细胞学异常女性进行阴道镜检查时诊断宫颈癌前病变
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;130(6):1218-1225. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002330.
4
Validation of a new HPV self-sampling device for cervical cancer screening: The Cervical and Self-Sample In Screening (CASSIS) study.一种用于宫颈癌筛查的新型 HPV 自我采样设备的验证:Cervical and Self-Sample In Screening(CASSIS)研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jun;149(3):491-497. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
5
The acceptability of a self-lavaging device compared to pelvic examination for cervical cancer screening among low-income women.一种自我清洗装置在低收入妇女宫颈癌筛查中相较于盆腔检查的可接受性。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012 Dec;21(12):1275-81. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2012.3512. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
6
HPV genotyping for triage of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results: a multicenter prospective study.人乳头瘤病毒基因分型用于宫颈癌筛查结果异常女性的分流:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct;20(5):974-81. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0789-4. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
7
Risks of CIN 2+, CIN 3+, and Cancer by Cytology and Human Papillomavirus Status: The Foundation of Risk-Based Cervical Screening Guidelines.根据细胞学和人乳头瘤病毒状态评估CIN 2+、CIN 3+及癌症风险:基于风险的宫颈癌筛查指南的基础
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2017 Oct;21(4):261-267. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000343.
8
Performance of self-collected cervical samples in screening for future precancer using human papillomavirus DNA testing.使用人乳头瘤病毒DNA检测自我采集宫颈样本在未来癌前病变筛查中的表现
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Dec 5;107(1):400. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju400. Print 2015 Jan.
9
The age-specific relationships of abnormal cytology and human papillomavirus DNA results to the risk of cervical precancer and cancer.细胞学异常和人乳头瘤病毒 DNA 结果与宫颈癌前病变和宫颈癌风险的年龄相关性。
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jul;116(1):76-84. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e3e719.
10
The reliability of high-risk human papillomavirus detection by Aptima HPV assay in women with ASC-US cytology.Aptima人乳头瘤病毒检测法对非典型鳞状细胞意义不明确(ASC-US)女性高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测的可靠性
J Clin Virol. 2015 Aug;69:52-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2015.05.006. Epub 2015 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The Utility of an Human Papillomavirus Genotype Assay for Cancer Screening in Self-Collected Urine and Vaginal Samples from Japanese Women.人乳头瘤病毒基因分型检测在日本女性自行采集的尿液和阴道样本癌症筛查中的效用
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2025;90(2):143-152. doi: 10.1159/000541641. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
2
Cervical Cancer Screening Postpandemic: Self-Sampling Opportunities to Accelerate the Elimination of Cervical Cancer.大流行后宫颈癌筛查:加速消除宫颈癌的自我采样机会
Int J Womens Health. 2021 Sep 18;13:841-859. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S288376. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
The acceptability of a self-lavaging device compared to pelvic examination for cervical cancer screening among low-income women.一种自我清洗装置在低收入妇女宫颈癌筛查中相较于盆腔检查的可接受性。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012 Dec;21(12):1275-81. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2012.3512. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
2
EUROGIN 2008 roadmap on cervical cancer prevention.欧洲生殖健康与研究学会2008年宫颈癌预防路线图
Int J Cancer. 2009 Nov 15;125(10):2246-55. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24634.
3
To ECC or not to ECC: the question remains.
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2008 Dec;35(4):583-97; viii. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2008.09.007.
4
Cervical smear adequacy: cellularity references were found to increase both interobserver agreement and unsatisfactory rate.
Cytopathology. 2009 Jun;20(3):161-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2008.00605.x. Epub 2008 Aug 18.
5
Adjunctive high-risk human papillomavirus DNA testing is a useful option for disease risk assessment in patients with negative Papanicolaou tests without an endocervical/transformation zone sample.对于巴氏试验阴性且未采集宫颈管/转化区样本的患者,辅助性高危型人乳头瘤病毒DNA检测是疾病风险评估的一种有用方法。
Cancer. 2008 Aug 25;114(4):242-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23598.
6
Human papillomavirus DNA versus Papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer.人乳头瘤病毒DNA检测与巴氏涂片检查用于宫颈癌筛查的比较
N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 18;357(16):1579-88. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071430.
7
Reasons for non-attendance in cervical cancer screening programmes: an application of the Integrated Model for Behavioural Change.宫颈癌筛查项目未参与的原因:行为改变综合模型的应用
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2007 Oct;16(5):436-45. doi: 10.1097/01.cej.0000236250.71113.7c.
8
2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests.2006年宫颈癌筛查异常女性管理共识指南
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Oct;197(4):346-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.047.
9
Cervical cancer screening in the 21st century: is it time to retire the PAP smear?21世纪的宫颈癌筛查:是时候淘汰巴氏涂片检查了吗?
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;50(2):313-23. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31804a8285.
10
Agreement between self- and clinician-collected specimen results for detection and typing of high-risk human papillomavirus in specimens from women in Gugulethu, South Africa.南非古古莱图地区女性样本中高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测与分型的自我采集样本结果与临床医生采集样本结果的一致性
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Jun;45(6):1679-83. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02369-06. Epub 2007 Apr 4.

使用自采装置进行宫颈癌筛查的细胞学和人乳头瘤病毒检测的有效性和可靠性:一项试点研究的结果

Validity and reliability of using a self-lavaging device for cytology and HPV testing for cervical cancer screening: findings from a pilot study.

作者信息

Jones Heidi E, Mansukhani Mahesh M, Tong Guo-Xia, Westhoff Carolyn L

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America ; Epidemiology & Biostatistics Program, City University of New York School of Public Health and Hunter College, New York, New York, United States of America.

Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Dec 20;8(12):e82115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082115. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0082115
PMID:24376516
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3869665/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Self-sampling could increase cervical cancer screening uptake. While methods have been identified for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, to date, self-sampling has not provided adequate specimens for cytology. We piloted the validity and reliability of using a self-lavaging device for cervical cytology and HPV testing. We enrolled 198 women in New York City in 2008-2009 from three ambulatory clinics where they received cervical cancer screening. All were asked to use the Delphi Screener™ to self-lavage 1-3 months after clinician-collected index cytological smear (100 normal; 98 abnormal). Women with abnormal cytology results from either specimen underwent colposcopy; 10 women with normal results from both specimens also underwent colposcopy. We calculated sensitivity of self-collected cytology to detect histologically confirmed high grade lesions (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, CIN, 2+); specificity for histology-negative (CIN 1 or lower), paired cytology negative, or a third cytology negative; and kappa for paired results. One hundred and ninety-seven (99.5%) women self-collected a lavage. Seventy-five percent had moderate to excellent cellularity, two specimens were unsatisfactory for cytology. Seven of 167 (4%) women with definitive results had CIN2+; one had normal and six abnormal cytology results with the self-lavage (sensitivity = 86%, 95% Confidence Interval, CI: 42, 100). The kappa for paired cytology was low (0.36; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.47) primarily due to clinician specimens with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) coded as normal using Screener specimens. However, three cases of HSIL were coded as ASC-US and one as normal using Screener specimens. Seventy-three women had paired high-risk HPV tests with a kappa of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.49, 0.84). Based on these preliminary findings, a larger study to estimate the performance of the Screener for co-testing cytology and HPV or for HPV testing with cytology triage is warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00702208.

摘要

未标注

自我采样可提高宫颈癌筛查的接受率。虽然已确定了人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测方法,但迄今为止,自我采样尚未提供足够的细胞学标本。我们对使用自我灌洗装置进行宫颈细胞学检查和HPV检测的有效性和可靠性进行了试点。2008年至2009年,我们在纽约市的三家门诊诊所招募了198名接受宫颈癌筛查的女性。所有女性均被要求在临床医生采集索引细胞学涂片后1至3个月使用Delphi Screener™进行自我灌洗(100例正常;98例异常)。任何一种标本细胞学结果异常的女性均接受阴道镜检查;10例两种标本结果均正常的女性也接受了阴道镜检查。我们计算了自我采集细胞学检测组织学确诊的高级别病变(宫颈上皮内瘤变,CIN,2级及以上)的敏感性;组织学阴性(CIN 1级或更低)、配对细胞学阴性或第三次细胞学阴性的特异性;以及配对结果的kappa值。197名(99.5%)女性进行了自我灌洗。75%的标本细胞量为中等至良好,两份标本细胞学检查不满意。167名结果明确的女性中有7名(4%)患有CIN2级及以上;1名自我灌洗细胞学结果正常,6名异常(敏感性=86%,95%置信区间,CI:42,100)。配对细胞学的kappa值较低(0.36;95%CI:0.25,0.47),主要是因为临床医生采集的标本中意义不明确的非典型鳞状细胞(ASC-US)和低级别鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL)在使用Screener标本编码时被视为正常。然而,使用Screener标本时,3例HSIL被编码为ASC-US,1例被编码为正常。73名女性进行了配对高危HPV检测,kappa值为0.66(95%CI:0.49,0.84)。基于这些初步发现,有必要进行一项更大规模的研究,以评估Screener在联合检测细胞学和HPV或用于细胞学分流的HPV检测中的性能。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00702208