Williams Emily E, Miller Sayers J, Sebastianelli Wayne J, Vairo Giampietro L
Penn State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Penn State Hershey Bone and Joint Institute, State College, PA, USA.
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013 Dec;8(6):828-37.
PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: There is a lack of evidence detailing the immediate effects of different cryotherapy interventions at the ankle on functional outcomes such as balance and jumping tasks in a physically active population; therefore, the purpose of the present study is to compare the immediate effects of varied modes of cryotherapy applications to the ankle joint on Star Excursion Balance Test and vertical jump height performance. The authors hypothesized that cryotherapy would acutely decrease performance when compared to a control, and that concomitant compression would further hinder outcomes.
A crossover study was conducted in a controlled laboratory setting. Thirty (9 men, 21 women) participants (20.6 ± 1.0 years, 1.7 ± 0.1 m, 67.5 ± 11.7 kg) were enrolled. The independent variable was treatment mode; no ice, ice without compression and ice with compression. Dependent variables included center of pressure (COP) excursions, dynamic balance reach distances and vertical jump height for the dominant leg. Participants underwent three separate testing sessions separated by 72-hour rest intervals. The order of treatment and performance measures was randomized to prevent order effects. Normalized dynamic balance reach distances were assessed using the reliable modified Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT). Center of pressure path length was assessed via a force platform during a single-legged static balance task under eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. Relative vertical jump height was assessed using a single-legged vertical hop test. Group means and standard deviations were calculated by treatment mode. One-way analyses of variance with Tukey's post hoc test were used to calculate differences among treatment modes. p < 0.05 denoted statistical significance.
No statistically significant differences existed for all the performance measures among treatment modes.
These findings suggest no immediate differences in lower extremity performance outcome measures between the respective treatment modes applied to the ankle in a young, healthy and physically active population. Additional investigation is warranted to study the related delayed effects of these interventions.
III.
目的/背景:目前缺乏证据详细说明针对踝关节的不同冷冻疗法干预措施对身体活跃人群的功能结果(如平衡和跳跃任务)的即时影响;因此,本研究的目的是比较不同模式的踝关节冷冻疗法应用对星标偏移平衡测试和垂直跳跃高度表现的即时影响。作者假设,与对照组相比,冷冻疗法会急性降低表现,并且同时施加压力会进一步阻碍结果。
在受控实验室环境中进行了一项交叉研究。招募了30名参与者(9名男性,21名女性)(年龄20.6±1.0岁,身高1.7±0.1米,体重67.5±11.7千克)。自变量为治疗模式;无冰敷、冰敷不施压和冰敷并施压。因变量包括压力中心(COP)偏移、动态平衡伸展距离和优势腿的垂直跳跃高度。参与者进行了三次单独的测试,每次测试间隔72小时休息。治疗顺序和表现测量顺序随机安排以防止顺序效应。使用可靠的改良星标偏移平衡测试(SEBT)评估标准化动态平衡伸展距离。在睁眼和闭眼条件下的单腿静态平衡任务期间,通过力平台评估压力中心路径长度。使用单腿垂直跳跃测试评估相对垂直跳跃高度。按治疗模式计算组均值和标准差。采用单因素方差分析及Tukey事后检验计算治疗模式之间的差异。p<0.05表示具有统计学意义。
各治疗模式之间所有表现测量指标均无统计学显著差异。
这些发现表明,在年轻、健康且身体活跃的人群中,应用于踝关节的各自治疗模式在下肢表现结果测量方面无即时差异。有必要进行进一步研究以探讨这些干预措施的相关延迟效应。
III级