Suppr超能文献

用于识别慢性踝关节不稳定个体的姿势稳定性测试。

Postural-stability tests that identify individuals with chronic ankle instability.

作者信息

Linens Shelley W, Ross Scott E, Arnold Brent L, Gayle Richard, Pidcoe Peter

机构信息

Georgia State University, Atlanta.

出版信息

J Athl Train. 2014 Jan-Feb;49(1):15-23. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.6.09. Epub 2013 Dec 30.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is characterized by repeated ankle sprains, which have been linked to postural instability. Therefore, it is important for clinicians to identify individuals with CAI who can benefit from rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the likelihood that CAI participants will exhibit impaired postural stability and that healthy control participants will exhibit better test performance values.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

Laboratory.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

People with CAI (n = 17, age = 23 ± 4 years, height = 168 ± 9 cm, weight = 68 ± 12 kg) who reported ankle "giving-way" sensations and healthy volunteers (n = 17, age = 23 ± 3 years, height = 168 ± 8 cm, weight = 66 ± 12 kg).

INTERVENTION(S): Participants performed 7 balance tests: Balance Error Scoring System (BESS), time in balance, foot lift, single-legged stance on a force plate, Star Excursion Balance Test, side hop, and figure-of-8 hop.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Balance was quantified with errors (score) for the BESS, length of time balancing (seconds) for time-in-balance test, frequency of foot lifts (score) for foot-lift test, velocity (cm/s) for all center-of-pressure velocity measures, excursion (cm) for center-of-pressure excursion measures, area (cm2) for 95% confidence ellipse center-of-pressure area and center-of-pressure rectangular area, time (seconds) for anterior-posterior and medial-lateral time-to-boundary (TTB) measures, distance reached (cm) for Star Excursion Balance Test, and time (seconds) to complete side-hop and figure-of-8 hop tests. We calculated area-under-the-curve values and cutoff scores and used the odds ratio to determine if those with and without CAI could be distinguished using cutoff scores.

RESULTS

We found significant area-under-the-curve values for 4 static noninstrumented measures, 3 force-plate measures, and 3 functional measures. Significant cutoff scores were noted for the time-in-balance test (≤25.89 seconds), foot-lift test (≥5), single-legged stance on the firm surface (≥3 errors) and total (≥14 errors) on the BESS, center-of-pressure resultant velocity (≥1.56 cm/s), standard deviations for medial-lateral (≤1.56 seconds) time-to-boundary and anterior-posterior (≤3.78 seconds) time-to-boundary test, posteromedial direction on the Star Excursion Balance Test (≤0.91), side-hop test (≥12.88 seconds), and figure-of-8 hop test (≥17.36 seconds).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians can use any of the 10 significant measures with their associated cutoff scores to identify those who could benefit from rehabilitation that reestablishes postural stability.

摘要

背景

慢性踝关节不稳(CAI)的特征是反复出现踝关节扭伤,这与姿势不稳有关。因此,对于临床医生来说,识别出能从康复治疗中获益的CAI患者很重要。

目的

评估CAI参与者出现姿势稳定性受损的可能性以及健康对照参与者表现出更好测试成绩值的可能性。

设计

病例对照研究。

地点

实验室。

患者或其他参与者

报告有踝关节“打软”感的CAI患者(n = 17,年龄 = 23 ± 4岁,身高 = 168 ± 9厘米,体重 = 68 ± 12千克)和健康志愿者(n = 17,年龄 = 23 ± 3岁,身高 = 168 ± 8厘米,体重 = 66 ± 12千克)。

干预措施

参与者进行7项平衡测试:平衡误差评分系统(BESS)、平衡时间、抬脚、在测力板上单腿站立、星标偏移平衡测试、侧跳和8字跳。

主要观察指标

BESS用误差(分数)量化平衡情况,平衡时间测试用平衡时间长度(秒),抬脚测试用抬脚频率(分数),所有压力中心速度测量用速度(厘米/秒),压力中心偏移测量用偏移量(厘米),95%置信椭圆压力中心面积和压力中心矩形面积用面积(平方厘米),前后和内外侧到边界时间(TTB)测量用时间(秒),星标偏移平衡测试用到达距离(厘米),侧跳和8字跳测试用完成时间(秒)。我们计算曲线下面积值和临界分数,并使用优势比来确定能否用临界分数区分有无CAI的患者。

结果

我们发现4项静态非仪器测量、3项测力板测量和3项功能测量有显著的曲线下面积值。在平衡时间测试(≤25.89秒)、抬脚测试(≥5)、在坚实表面上单腿站立(≥3次误差)以及BESS总分(≥14次误差)、压力中心合成速度(≥1.56厘米/秒)、内外侧到边界时间(≤1.56秒)和前后到边界时间(≤3.78秒)测试的标准差、星标偏移平衡测试后内侧方向(≤0.91)、侧跳测试(≥12.88秒)和8字跳测试(≥17.36秒)中发现了显著的临界分数。

结论

临床医生可以使用这10项显著测量指标中的任何一项及其相关临界分数来识别那些能从恢复姿势稳定性的康复治疗中获益的患者。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验