Cao Wen-Zhong, Pang Wen-Ru, Su Peng
Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Chinese Medicine Healthcare Center, Cangzhou Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Hebei Province Cangzhou 061001, China.
Physical Health Examination Center, Cangzhou Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Hebei Province.
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2013 Oct;33(10):877-80.
To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of the three therapies of strong stimulation for children peripheral facial palsy so as to deal with the problem on the inactive acceptance of acupuncture in children.
Eighty cases of children peripheral facial palsy were randomized into a moxa stick group (group A) and a group with three therapies of strong stimulation (group B). Baihui (GV 20), Sibai (ST 2), Dicang (ST 4), Jiache (ST 6) and the other acupoints were selected in the two groups and stimulated with half-needling technique. In the group A, 3 moxa sticks were bunched together for surrounding moxibustion over one of Dazhui (GV 14), Yangbai (GB 14), Xiaguan (ST 7) and Jiache (ST 6) in each treatment. In the group B, the strong pricking therapy, strong cupping therapy and strong moxibustion were adopted at the same acupoints as the group A. The treatment was given twice every day in the first 5 days. Afterwards, the clinical efficacy was analyzed statistically. The treatment was kept on for the effective case. Those with failed effect were transferred to the other group. Since the 6th day, the treatment was given once every day. In 15 days, the clinical efficacy was compared between the two groups and House-Brackmann (H-B) facial nerve function grade was compared before and after treatment.
In 5 days of treatment, the total effective rate was 94.7% (36/38) in the group B, which was better than 52.4% (22/42) in the group A, (P < 0.001). In 15 days of treatment, the cured rate and the total effective rate in the group B were 67.3% (35/52) and 96.2% (50/52), which were better than 9.5% (2/21) and 85.7% (18/21) in the group A, respectively (P < 0. 001, P < 0.05). Additionally, the result of H-B facial nerve function grade in the group B was superior to the group A (P < 0.001).
The half-needling technique and the three therapies of strong stimulation in combination achieve the superior efficacy on children peripheral facial palsy as compared with the half-needling technique combined with moxa stick therapy. And the obvious adverse reaction has not been found.
评价三种强刺激疗法治疗小儿周围性面瘫的临床疗效及安全性,以解决小儿对针刺治疗接受度不高的问题。
将80例小儿周围性面瘫患儿随机分为艾灸组(A组)和三种强刺激疗法组(B组)。两组均选取百会(GV20)、四白(ST2)、地仓(ST4)、颊车(ST6)等穴位,采用半刺技术进行刺激。A组每次治疗时将3根艾条捆在一起,在大椎(GV14)、阳白(GB14)、下关(ST7)、颊车(ST6)其中之一上进行围灸。B组在与A组相同穴位采用强刺血疗法、强拔罐疗法和强艾灸疗法。前5天每天治疗2次。之后进行临床疗效的统计学分析。有效病例继续治疗。无效者转至另一组。从第6天起,每天治疗1次。15天后比较两组临床疗效,并比较治疗前后的House-Brackmann(H-B)面神经功能分级。
治疗5天时,B组总有效率为94.7%(36/38),优于A组的52.4%(22/42),(P<0.001)。治疗15天时,B组治愈率和总有效率分别为67.3%(35/52)和96.2%(50/52),分别优于A组的9.5%(2/21)和85.7%(18/21),(P<0.001,P<0.05)。此外,B组H-B面神经功能分级结果优于A组(P<0.001)。
与半刺技术结合艾灸疗法相比,半刺技术与三种强刺激疗法联合应用治疗小儿周围性面瘫疗效更佳,且未发现明显不良反应。