Legnani Claudio, Saladini Matteo, Faraldi Martina, Peretti Giuseppe M, Ventura Alberto
Sport Traumatology and Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20148 Milan, Italy.
Residency Program in Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Sports (Basel). 2025 May 30;13(6):171. doi: 10.3390/sports13060171.
The purpose of this study was to assess whether a simple and reproducible battery of jump tests can distinguish between patients affected by chronic ankle instability (CAI) and control subjects. The hypothesis was that patients with CAI would demonstrate lower performance compared to healthy subjects during jumping tasks. Twenty-one young, active adults aged 18 to 45 years affected by CAI were matched for sex, age, and body mass index (BMI) to a control group of 21 healthy subjects without history of lower limb pathology. Jumping ability was instrumentally assessed by an infrared optical acquisition system using a test battery, including mono- and bipodalic vertical squat jumps, countermovement jumps (CMJs), a drop jump (DJ), and a side-hop test. Patients with CAI had significantly worse monopodalic CMJ, DJ, and side-hop test scores in their involved limb compared to the non-dominant limb of healthy individuals. Pathological limbs of CAI patients reported inferior results compared to non-dominant limbs of healthy individuals while performing monopodalic CMJs, DJs, and side-hop tests ( < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in the limb symmetry index (LSI) while performing monopodalic CMJs and DJs ( = 0.072 and = 0.071, respectively), while a difference was found between the two groups, in favor of healthy subjects, while performing monopodalic side-hop tests ( < 0.01). A reproducible battery of jump tests performed with a simple and low-cost instrument can be applied in the clinical setting allowing for reliable measurements of functional ability of subjects with CAI. Our findings support the idea that side-hop tests could be more accurate than vertical jump tests for detecting functional deficits in patients suffering from CAI.
本研究的目的是评估一组简单且可重复的跳跃测试能否区分慢性踝关节不稳(CAI)患者和对照组受试者。假设是,与健康受试者相比,CAI患者在跳跃任务中的表现会更低。将21名年龄在18至45岁、患有CAI的年轻活跃成年人,按照性别、年龄和体重指数(BMI)与21名无下肢病理病史的健康受试者组成的对照组进行匹配。使用包括单脚和双脚垂直深蹲跳、反向运动跳(CMJ)、下落跳(DJ)和侧向跳测试的测试组,通过红外光学采集系统对跳跃能力进行仪器评估。与健康个体的非优势肢体相比,CAI患者患侧肢体的单脚CMJ、DJ和侧向跳测试得分明显更差。在进行单脚CMJ、DJ和侧向跳测试时,CAI患者的患侧肢体与健康个体的非优势肢体相比,结果较差(<0.05)。在进行单脚CMJ和DJ时两组的肢体对称指数(LSI)无统计学显著差异(分别为=0.072和=0.071),而在进行单脚侧向跳测试时两组存在差异,有利于健康受试者(<0.01)。使用简单且低成本仪器进行的一组可重复跳跃测试可应用于临床环境,从而可靠测量CAI受试者的功能能力。我们的研究结果支持这样一种观点,即侧向跳测试在检测CAI患者的功能缺陷方面可能比垂直跳测试更准确。