a Institute of Biomedicine, Seville, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/University of Seville , Seville , Spain.
J Trauma Dissociation. 2014;15(1):35-51. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2013.821433.
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between childhood traumas, mindfulness, and dissociation (more specifically, absorption and depersonalization) in healthy subjects with and without hallucination proneness. A sample of 318 subjects was given the Launay-Slade Hallucination Scale-Revised (R. P. Bentall & P. Slade, 1985). From this sample, 2 groups were formed: one with high and the other with low hallucination proneness. Furthermore, all participants were given the Tellegen Absorption Scale (A. Tellegen & G. Atkinson, 1974), the Cambridge Depersonalization Scale (M. Sierra & G. E. Berrios, 2000), the Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire (P. D. J. Chadwick et al., 2008), and the Trauma Questionnaire (J. R. E. Davidson, D. Hughes, & D. G. Blazer, 1990). The results showed that in the group with high hallucination proneness, there were significantly more subjects with traumatic experiences than in the group with low predisposition, although no significant difference in the mean number of traumatic experiences undergone in childhood was found between the 2 groups, although there was a trend toward significance. A correlation analysis showed a significant negative association between mindfulness on the one hand and absorption and depersonalization on the other. A positive relationship was also found between childhood traumas and absorption and depersonalization. Finally, multiple mediation analysis showed that the absorption and depersonalization variables acted as mediators between childhood traumas and hallucination proneness. We discuss the importance of the relationship between the variables studied and hallucination proneness and suggest some approaches for their treatment.
本研究旨在探讨童年创伤、正念和(更具体地说,即专注和去人格化)与有和无幻觉倾向的健康受试者之间的关系。样本中有 318 名受试者接受了拉努伊-斯莱德幻觉量表修订版(R. P. 本特尔和 P. 斯莱德,1985 年)。从这个样本中,形成了 2 个组:一个是高幻觉倾向组,另一个是低幻觉倾向组。此外,所有参与者都接受了泰尔根吸收量表(A. 泰尔根和 G. 阿特金森,1974 年)、剑桥去人格化量表(M. 塞拉和 G. E. 贝里奥斯,2000 年)、南安普顿正念问卷(P. D. J. 查德威克等人,2008 年)和创伤问卷(J. R. E. 戴维森、D. 休斯和 D. G. 布拉泽,1990 年)。结果表明,在高幻觉倾向组中,有创伤经历的受试者明显多于低倾向组,尽管两组之间在童年时期经历的创伤事件的平均数量上没有显著差异,但存在显著趋势。相关分析表明,一方面正念与专注和去人格化呈显著负相关。同时,还发现童年创伤与专注和去人格化之间存在正相关。最后,多重中介分析表明,吸收和去人格化变量在童年创伤和幻觉倾向之间起中介作用。我们讨论了所研究变量与幻觉倾向之间的关系的重要性,并提出了一些治疗这些变量的方法。