Due-Tonnessen Paulina, Rasmussen Inge, Berntsen Erik Magnus, Bjornerud Atle, Emblem Kyrre E
From the *Department of Radiology, and †Intervention Centre, Clinic for Imaging and Intervention, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet; ‡Institute of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo; §Department of Radiology, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim; and ∥Institute of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2014 Jan-Feb;38(1):1-8. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3182a589e0.
Identification of eloquent brain areas in patients with intra-axial lesions is important to minimize the risk of neurological deficit. We performed a multicenter study comparing conventional 2-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for identification of the central sulcus to topographical MRI and blood-oxygenation-level-dependent functional MRI (BOLD-fMRI).
Seventy-seven unoperated patients with brain lesions were imaged at 1.5 or 3 T. The central sulcus was identified by an experienced neuroradiologist on 2-dimensional MRI, by topographic analysis of 3-dimensional MRI in BrainVoyager, and by BOLD-fMRI analysis in BrainVoyager or SPM5.
The central sulcus in the affected hemisphere was readily identified in a significantly higher percentage of patients by 2-dimensional MRI and topographical analysis (77/77 patients) compared to BOLD-fMRI (57 patients; P < 0.001). The topographical analysis identified a significantly larger portion of the total central sulcus than 2-dimensional MRI (P < 0.05). No differences were found between institutions, histological versus radiological diagnoses, MRI sequence parameters, age, or sex.
Identification of the central sulcus is best performed using topographical analysis; however, 2-dimensional analysis may suffice for daily routine work.
识别轴内病变患者的脑功能区对于将神经功能缺损风险降至最低很重要。我们开展了一项多中心研究,比较传统二维磁共振成像(MRI)与脑地形图MRI及血氧水平依赖性功能MRI(BOLD-fMRI)在识别中央沟方面的差异。
77例未经手术的脑病变患者接受了1.5或3T的成像检查。由一位经验丰富的神经放射科医生分别通过二维MRI、在BrainVoyager中对三维MRI进行地形图分析以及在BrainVoyager或SPM5中进行BOLD-fMRI分析来识别中央沟。
与BOLD-fMRI(57例患者)相比,通过二维MRI和地形图分析,在更高比例的患者中能够轻松识别出患侧半球的中央沟(77/77例患者;P<0.001)。地形图分析识别出的中央沟总长度明显长于二维MRI(P<0.05)。在不同机构、组织学与放射学诊断、MRI序列参数、年龄或性别之间未发现差异。
使用地形图分析识别中央沟效果最佳;然而二维分析可能足以满足日常工作需求。