Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Bureau of Meteorology, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia; University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Sci Total Environ. 2014 Mar 1;473-474:338-49. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.053. Epub 2013 Dec 28.
Despite strong demand for information to support the sustainable use of Australia's natural resources and conserve environmental values and despite considerable effort and investment, nation-wide environmental data collection and analysis remains a substantially unmet challenge. We review progress in producing national environmental reports and accounts, identify challenges and opportunities, and analyse the potential role of research in addressing these. Australia's low and concentrated population density and the short history since European settlement contribute to the lack of environmental data. There are additional factors: highly diverse data requirements and standards, disagreement on information priorities, poorly measurable management objectives, lack of coordination, over-reliance on researchers and businesses for data collection, lack of business engagement, and short-term, project-based activities. New opportunities have arisen to overcome some of these challenges: enhanced monitoring networks, standardisation, data management and modelling, greater commitment to share and integrate data, community monitoring, increasing acceptance of environmental and sustainability indicators, and progress in environmental accounting practices. Successes in generating climate, water and greenhouse gas information appear to be attributable to an unambiguous data requirement, considerable investment, and legislative instruments that enhance data sharing and create a clearly defined role for operational agencies. Based on the analysis presented, we suggest six priorities for research: (1) common definitions and standards for information that address management objectives, (2) ecological measures that are scalable from local to national level, (3) promotion of long-term data collection and reporting by researchers, (4) efficient satellite and sensor network technologies and data analysis methods, (5) environmental modelling approaches that can reconcile multiple data sources, and (6) experimental accounting to pursue consistent, credible and relevant information structures and to identify new data requirements. Opportunities exist to make progress in each of these areas and help secure a more sustainable future.
尽管人们强烈要求提供信息,以支持澳大利亚自然资源的可持续利用和保护环境价值,并且已经付出了相当大的努力和投资,但全国性的环境数据收集和分析仍然是一个尚未得到充分满足的挑战。我们回顾了制作国家环境报告和账户的进展,确定了挑战和机遇,并分析了研究在解决这些问题中的潜在作用。澳大利亚的低而集中的人口密度和自欧洲殖民以来的短暂历史导致了环境数据的缺乏。还有其他因素:高度多样化的数据需求和标准、信息优先事项的分歧、难以衡量的管理目标、缺乏协调、过度依赖研究人员和企业进行数据收集、缺乏企业参与以及短期、基于项目的活动。克服其中一些挑战的新机会已经出现:增强的监测网络、标准化、数据管理和建模、更大程度地承诺共享和整合数据、社区监测、对环境和可持续性指标的接受程度提高,以及环境核算实践的进展。在生成气候、水和温室气体信息方面取得的成功似乎归因于明确的数据要求、大量投资以及增强数据共享和为运营机构创造明确角色的立法工具。根据提出的分析,我们建议研究的六个优先事项:(1) 针对管理目标的具有共同定义和标准的信息,(2) 可从本地扩展到国家层面的生态措施,(3) 促进研究人员长期数据收集和报告,(4) 高效的卫星和传感器网络技术和数据分析方法,(5) 能够协调多个数据源的环境建模方法,以及(6) 实验性核算,以追求一致、可信和相关的信息结构,并确定新的数据需求。在这些领域中的每一个领域都有取得进展的机会,并有助于确保更可持续的未来。