Dalmasso Marion, Bolocan Andrei Sorin, Hernandez Marta, Kapetanakou Anastasia E, Kuchta Tomáš, Manios Stavros G, Melero Beatriz, Minarovičová Jana, Muhterem Meryem, Nicolau Anca Ioana, Rovira Jordi, Skandamis Panagiotis N, Stessl Beatrix, Wagner Martin, Jordan Kieran, Rodríguez-Lázaro David
Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
Faculty of Food Science and Engineering, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Romania.
J Microbiol Methods. 2014 Mar;98:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.12.018. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
Analysis for Listeria monocytogenes by ISO11290-1 is time-consuming, entailing two enrichment steps and subsequent plating on agar plates, taking five days without isolate confirmation. The aim of this study was to determine if a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay could be used for analysis of the first and second enrichment broths, saving four or two days, respectively. In a comprehensive approach involving six European laboratories, PCR and traditional plating of both enrichment broths from the ISO11290-1 method were compared for the detection of L. monocytogenes in 872 food, raw material and processing environment samples from 13 different dairy and meat food chains. After the first and second enrichments, total DNA was extracted from the enriched cultures and analysed for the presence of L. monocytogenes DNA by PCR. DNA extraction by chaotropic solid-phase extraction (spin column-based silica) combined with real-time PCR (RTi-PCR) was required as it was shown that crude DNA extraction applying sonication lysis and boiling followed by traditional gel-based PCR resulted in fewer positive results than plating. The RTi-PCR results were compared to plating, as defined by the ISO11290-1 method. For first and second enrichments, 90% of the samples gave the same results by RTi-PCR and plating, whatever the RTi-PCR method used. For the samples that gave different results, plating was significantly more accurate for detection of positive samples than RTi-PCR from the first enrichment, but RTi-PCR detected a greater number of positive samples than plating from the second enrichment, regardless of the RTi-PCR method used. RTi-PCR was more accurate for non-food contact surface and food contact surface samples than for food and raw material samples especially from the first enrichment, probably because of sample matrix interference. Even though RTi-PCR analysis of the first enrichment showed less positive results than plating, in outbreak scenarios where a rapid result is required, RTi-PCR could be an efficient way to get a preliminary result to be then confirmed by plating. Using DNA extraction from the second enrichment broth followed by RTi-PCR was reliable and a confirmed result could be obtained in three days, as against seven days by ISO11290-1.
采用ISO11290-1标准对单核细胞增生李斯特菌进行分析耗时较长,需要进行两个富集步骤,随后在琼脂平板上进行接种培养,整个过程需要五天且无法确认是否分离出菌株。本研究的目的是确定聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测法是否可用于分析第一次和第二次富集肉汤,分别节省四天或两天时间。在一项涉及六个欧洲实验室的综合研究中,对ISO11290-1方法中两种富集肉汤的PCR检测和传统平板接种法进行了比较,以检测来自13条不同乳制品和肉类食品链的872份食品、原材料和加工环境样本中的单核细胞增生李斯特菌。在第一次和第二次富集后,从富集培养物中提取总DNA,并通过PCR分析是否存在单核细胞增生李斯特菌DNA。由于研究表明,采用超声裂解和煮沸后进行传统凝胶PCR的粗DNA提取方法所得到的阳性结果比平板接种法少,因此需要采用基于离液序列高的固相萃取(基于离心柱的硅胶)结合实时PCR(RTi-PCR)进行DNA提取。将RTi-PCR结果与ISO11290-1标准定义的平板接种法结果进行比较。对于第一次和第二次富集,无论使用何种RTi-PCR方法,90%的样本通过RTi-PCR和平板接种法得到的结果相同。对于结果不同的样本,在检测阳性样本时,平板接种法比第一次富集后的RTi-PCR更准确,但无论使用何种RTi-PCR方法,第二次富集后的RTi-PCR检测到的阳性样本数量都比平板接种法多。RTi-PCR对非食品接触表面和食品接触表面样本的检测比对食品和原材料样本更准确,尤其是在第一次富集时,这可能是由于样本基质干扰所致。尽管第一次富集的RTi-PCR分析显示阳性结果比平板接种法少,但在需要快速得到结果的爆发情况下,RTi-PCR可能是获得初步结果然后通过平板接种法进行确认的有效方法。使用从第二次富集肉汤中提取的DNA进行RTi-PCR检测是可靠的,三天即可获得确认结果,而采用ISO11290-1标准则需要七天。