• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多支血管病变伴非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的单支血管或多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。

Single-vessel or multivessel PCI in patients with multivessel disease presenting with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.

机构信息

Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2013 Dec;9(8):916-22. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I8A154.

DOI:10.4244/EIJV9I8A154
PMID:24384289
Abstract

AIMS

Coronary artery disease is often diffuse and patients with non-ST-segment acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) demonstrate multivessel coronary disease. The purpose of this study was to clarify whether interventions on stable chronic non-culprit lesions in patients with NSTE-ACS can prevent future adverse events.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 990 consecutive patients who underwent either single-vessel PCI (SVPCI: n=379) or multivessel PCI (MVPCI: n=611) in a setting of NSTE-ACS. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to compensate for differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. To minimise the impact of confounding factors, we performed propensity matching (SVPCI: n=230, MVPCI: n=230). Patients who had MVPCI had a lower rate of prior interventional treatment or myocardial infarction, and more complex lesions than patients with SVPCI. At three years, all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the MVPCI group than the SVPCI group (13.0% vs. 18.3%, p=0.02, adjusted HR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.38-0.80), while the rates of target vessel revascularisation and a composite of all-cause death or myocardial infarction were not different between the groups. In the propensity-matched cohort, all-cause death remained significantly lower in the MVPCI group (adjusted HR 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22-0.75) compared to the SVPCI group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, multivessel PCI reduced all-cause mortality in a setting of NSTE-ACS compared to single-vessel PCI. Further investigations to confirm these results are warranted.

摘要

目的

冠心病通常呈弥漫性,非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者表现为多支血管病变。本研究旨在明确 NSTE-ACS 患者非罪犯稳定慢性病变进行介入治疗是否能预防未来不良事件。

方法和结果

我们对 990 例连续 NSTE-ACS 患者进行了回顾性队列研究,这些患者分别接受了单支血管 PCI(SVPCI:n=379)或多支血管 PCI(MVPCI:n=611)。采用 Cox 比例风险回归分析来补偿两组间基线特征的差异。为了最小化混杂因素的影响,我们进行了倾向匹配(SVPCI:n=230,MVPCI:n=230)。与 SVPCI 患者相比,MVPCI 患者既往介入治疗或心肌梗死发生率较低,病变更为复杂。3 年时,MVPCI 组全因死亡率明显低于 SVPCI 组(13.0% vs. 18.3%,p=0.02,调整后的 HR 0.55,95%CI:0.38-0.80),但两组间靶血管血运重建和全因死亡或心肌梗死复合终点发生率无差异。在倾向匹配队列中,MVPCI 组全因死亡仍明显低于 SVPCI 组(调整后的 HR 0.41,95%CI:0.22-0.75)。

结论

在本回顾性研究中,与单支血管 PCI 相比,多支血管 PCI 可降低 NSTE-ACS 患者的全因死亡率。需要进一步研究来证实这些结果。

相似文献

1
Single-vessel or multivessel PCI in patients with multivessel disease presenting with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.多支血管病变伴非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的单支血管或多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
EuroIntervention. 2013 Dec;9(8):916-22. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I8A154.
2
Outcomes of culprit versus multivessel PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by shock.多支冠状动脉疾病合并ST段抬高型心肌梗死并发休克患者罪犯血管PCI与多支血管PCI的结局
J Invasive Cardiol. 2013 May;25(5):218-24.
3
Culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease.罪犯血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与多血管和分期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并多血管病变患者。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jan;3(1):22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.017.
4
Prognostic impact of multivessel versus culprit vessel only percutaneous intervention for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease presenting with acute coronary syndrome.多支血管病变与仅罪犯血管经皮介入治疗对急性冠状动脉综合征合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者的预后影响
EuroIntervention. 2015 Jul;11(3):293-300. doi: 10.4244/EIJY14M08_05.
5
Culprit-only or multivessel percutaneous coronary stenting in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: one-year follow-up.非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者行罪犯血管或多血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一年随访。
J Interv Cardiol. 2009 Aug;22(4):329-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2009.00477.x. Epub 2009 Jun 8.
6
Percutaneous coronary intervention in women: in-hospital clinical outcome: experience from a single private institution in Melbourne.女性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:住院临床结局:来自墨尔本一家私立机构的经验
Heart Lung Circ. 2008;17 Suppl 4:S55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
7
Long-term outcome in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease treated with culprit-only, immediate, or staged multivessel percutaneous revascularization strategies: Insights from the REAL registry.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者采用仅处理罪犯血管、即刻或分期多支血管经皮血管重建策略的长期预后:来自REAL注册研究的见解
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Nov 15;84(6):912-22. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25374. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
8
Comparison of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe coronary artery disease presenting with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.比较多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术在伴有非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的严重冠状动脉疾病患者中的应用。
Kardiol Pol. 2018;76(10):1474-1481. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2018.0151. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
9
Culprit-only or multivessel revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndromes: an American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Database Registry report.急性冠状动脉综合征患者单纯罪犯血管血运重建与多支血管血运重建:美国心脏病学会国家心血管数据库注册研究报告
Am Heart J. 2008 Jan;155(1):140-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.09.007.
10
What is optimal revascularization strategy in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction? Multivessel or culprit-only revascularization.非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者多支血管病变的最佳血运重建策略是什么?多支血管病变血运重建或罪犯血管血运重建。
Int J Cardiol. 2011 Dec 1;153(2):148-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.08.044. Epub 2010 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Multivessel versus culprit vessel only percutaneous coronary intervention in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: Systematic review and meta-analysis.多支血管与仅罪犯血管行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗非ST段抬高型心肌梗死:系统评价与荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 May 30;104(22):e42527. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042527.
2
A riddle of culprit only vs multivessel or immediate vs staged revascularization in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者中仅罪犯血管与多支血管病变或即刻与分期血运重建之谜:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 18;20(3):e0310695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310695. eCollection 2025.
3
Multivessel versus Culprit-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.
非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者多支血管与仅罪犯血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对比研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 18;11(20):6144. doi: 10.3390/jcm11206144.
4
Management of multivessel coronary artery disease in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a complex path to precision medicine.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者多支冠状动脉疾病的管理:通往精准医学的复杂路径。
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2020 Jul 1;11:2040622320938527. doi: 10.1177/2040622320938527. eCollection 2020.
5
Complete and incomplete revascularization in non-ST segment myocardial infarction with multivessel disease: long-term outcomes of first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents.多支血管病变的非ST段心肌梗死患者完全与不完全血运重建:第一代和第二代药物洗脱支架的长期疗效
Heart Vessels. 2019 Feb;34(2):251-258. doi: 10.1007/s00380-018-1252-z. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
6
Early and long-term outcomes of complete revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease presenting with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.多支冠状动脉疾病合并非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗实现完全血运重建的早期和长期结果
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2018;14(1):32-41. doi: 10.5114/aic.2018.74353. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
7
Multivessel versus Single Vessel Angioplasty in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征中多支血管与单支血管血管成形术的系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 17;11(2):e0148756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148756. eCollection 2016.