Best-Shaw Lauren, Gudbrandsen Maria, Nagar Jessica, Rose Diana, David Anthony S, Patel Maxine X
*Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London; and †North London Hub, Mental Health Research Network, London, United Kingdom.
Ther Drug Monit. 2014 Aug;36(4):486-93. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000041.
Why psychiatrists choose a particular dose of antipsychotic for an individual patient with schizophrenia is unknown. This study aimed to investigate consultant psychiatrists' perspectives on the dose titration and their attitudes towards therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for antipsychotics.
A cross-sectional quantitative questionnaire study of consultant psychiatrists based in London was conducted. A new questionnaire was developed, in part, based on the findings from focus groups. Themes included dose choice, titration, switching, and the pros and cons of TDM use.
For 105 consultant psychiatrists, choice of antipsychotic was most influenced by perceived side-effects/tolerance (63.8%). When choosing an optimum dose, most based this on their past clinical experience of patients presenting in a similar way (80.0%), perspectives on the equivalent doses of 2 antipsychotics (69.5%), or the individual patient's stated dose preference (61.9%). Factors thought to warrant a lower dose (eg, first episode psychosis) were consistent with a former study, and 59.0% of the clinicians believed it acceptable to switch antipsychotics ≥4 per year. The majority of clinicians currently routinely use TDM for clozapine (82.9%), and previous use of TDM for clozapine was found to predict likely future use of TDM with antipsychotics (χ = 5.51, P = 0.019). Furthermore, clinicians agreed that TDM could assist in minimizing the risk of dose-related side effects (77.1%). However, 32.4% did not agree that TDM would improve clinical outcomes. Overall, there was a positive attitude towards TDM for antipsychotics, and almost all clinicians (84.8%, 95% confidence interval, 77.9-91.7) would use it if widely available.
Current prescribing decisions regarding antipsychotic dose are mainly influenced by clinician intuition, previous experience, and patient preference. Although some expressed concerns regarding the evidence base, most clinicians reported that they would use TDM for antipsychotics if readily available.
精神科医生为何为特定的精神分裂症患者选择某一特定剂量的抗精神病药物尚不清楚。本研究旨在调查顾问精神科医生对抗精神病药物剂量滴定的看法以及他们对治疗药物监测(TDM)的态度。
对伦敦的顾问精神科医生进行了一项横断面定量问卷调查研究。部分基于焦点小组的研究结果开发了一份新问卷。主题包括剂量选择、滴定、换药以及使用TDM的利弊。
对于105名顾问精神科医生而言,选择抗精神病药物时受感知到的副作用/耐受性影响最大(63.8%)。选择最佳剂量时,大多数人基于他们过去对以类似方式就诊患者的临床经验(80.0%)、对两种抗精神病药物等效剂量的看法(69.5%)或患者个人陈述的剂量偏好(61.9%)。被认为需要较低剂量的因素(如首发精神病)与之前的一项研究一致,59.0%的临床医生认为每年换药≥4次是可以接受的。大多数临床医生目前常规对氯氮平使用TDM(82.9%),并且发现之前对氯氮平使用TDM可预测未来可能对其他抗精神病药物使用TDM(χ = 5.51,P = 0.019)。此外,临床医生一致认为TDM有助于将剂量相关副作用的风险降至最低(77.1%)。然而,32.4%的人不同意TDM会改善临床结局。总体而言,对用于抗精神病药物的TDM持积极态度,几乎所有临床医生(84.8%,95%置信区间,77.9 - 91.7)表示如果广泛可用就会使用它。
目前关于抗精神病药物剂量的处方决策主要受临床医生的直觉、既往经验和患者偏好影响。尽管一些人对证据基础表示担忧,但大多数临床医生报告称如果TDM容易获得,他们会将其用于抗精神病药物。