Münch R, Kehl O, Bühler H, Medici T, Ammann R
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1987 May 16;117(20):756-60.
The diagnostic value of serum enzyme provocative tests (SEP) is disputed. In particular, the specificity of the test has not been adequately investigated. New interest in the test has arisen with the introduction of pancreas-specific serum enzyme tests. It has been shown that a poststimulatory increase of serum enzymes is found in chronic pancreatitis with well preserved exocrine function, but also in healthy individuals and particularly cigarette smokers. Recently it has been postulated that the lack of a poststimulatory enzyme response is typical of advanced chronic pancreatitis. We investigated the effect of secretin (1 CU/kg i.v.) on serum levels of amylase, pancreasisoamylase, lipase and trypsin for 30 minutes in 48 volunteers without pancreatic disease (19 non-smokers, 19 smokers and 10 patients with hypoxemia). Mean values of all enzymes were significantly higher after stimulation. Enzyme response of trypsin and lipase was more pronounced than that of amylase or pancreasisoamylase. However, depending on the enzyme studied, no significant increase of serum values was found in 47.4% to 89.5% of smokers, 26.3 to 68.4% of non-smokers and 10 to 50% of patients with hypoxemia. The marked variability of enzyme response in controls demonstrates the low specificity of this test. Therefore, SEP are of no diagnostic value in pancreatic disease.
血清酶激发试验(SEP)的诊断价值存在争议。特别是,该试验的特异性尚未得到充分研究。随着胰腺特异性血清酶检测方法的引入,人们对该试验产生了新的兴趣。研究表明,在慢性胰腺炎且外分泌功能保存良好的患者中,以及在健康个体尤其是吸烟者中,均可发现刺激后血清酶升高。最近有人提出,刺激后酶反应缺乏是晚期慢性胰腺炎的典型表现。我们对48名无胰腺疾病的志愿者(19名非吸烟者、19名吸烟者和10名低氧血症患者)静脉注射促胰液素(1 CU/kg),并在30分钟内检测淀粉酶、胰淀粉酶、脂肪酶和胰蛋白酶的血清水平。刺激后所有酶的平均值均显著升高。胰蛋白酶和脂肪酶的酶反应比淀粉酶或胰淀粉酶更明显。然而,根据所研究的酶不同,在47.4%至89.5%的吸烟者、26.3%至68.4%的非吸烟者以及10%至50%的低氧血症患者中,未发现血清值有显著升高。对照组中酶反应的显著变异性表明该试验的特异性较低。因此,SEP在胰腺疾病诊断中无诊断价值。