Hermansen Anna M K, Cleland Joshua A, Kammerlind Ann-Sofi C, Peolsson Anneli L C
PhD Student, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Professor, Physical Therapy Department, Franklin Pierce University, Concord, NH.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Feb;37(2):87-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.11.002. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate neck-related physical function in individuals 11 to 14 years after anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) surgery for degenerative cervical disk disease and to compare the long-term outcome of 2 surgical techniques, including the Cloward procedure and cervical intervertebral fusion cage.
In this cross-sectional study, 51 individuals, 11 years or more after ACDF, underwent testing of cervical active range of motion, hand-grip strength, static and dynamic balance, neck muscle endurance, and completed pain ratings. The participants' values were compared with values of age- and sex-matched healthy individuals to evaluate impairments. Correlations between different test scores and pain were performed. Group differences were analyzed between the 2 surgical techniques.
Sixty-five percent and 82% exhibited impairment in ventral and dorsal neck muscle endurance, respectively. Impairment rates of 18% to 39% for cervical active range of motion, 27% to 43% for hand-grip strength, 37% for standing balance, and 35% for dynamic balance were recorded. Twenty-nine percent of the participants had impairment (>30 mm visual analog scale) in pain. There were no significant differences in physical function between the 2 surgical treatment groups (Cloward procedure or cervical intervertebral fusion cage) (P = .10-.92).
In those studied, a large percentage of patients who had anterior cervical decompression and fusion surgery have impairments in neck-related physical function when compared 11 to 14 years after surgery with age- and sex-matched healthy reference individuals. Neck-specific function, but not balance, was statistically correlated to pain. Neck muscle endurance was most affected, and balance impairments were also present in one-third of the individuals. There were no differences in long-term physical function between the 2 surgical techniques.
本研究旨在评估因退行性颈椎间盘疾病接受颈椎前路减压融合术(ACDF)11至14年后患者的颈部相关身体功能,并比较两种手术技术(包括Cloward手术和颈椎椎间融合器)的长期疗效。
在这项横断面研究中,51例接受ACDF手术11年或更长时间的患者接受了颈椎活动范围、握力、静态和动态平衡、颈部肌肉耐力测试,并完成了疼痛评分。将参与者的各项数值与年龄和性别匹配的健康个体的数值进行比较,以评估功能障碍情况。对不同测试分数与疼痛之间的相关性进行了分析。分析了两种手术技术之间的组间差异。
分别有65%和82%的患者腹侧和背侧颈部肌肉耐力存在功能障碍。颈椎活动范围的功能障碍率为18%至39%,握力为27%至43%,站立平衡为37%,动态平衡为35%。29%的参与者存在疼痛功能障碍(视觉模拟评分>30 mm)。两种手术治疗组(Cloward手术或颈椎椎间融合器)之间的身体功能无显著差异(P = 0.10 - 0.92)。
在本研究对象中,与年龄和性别匹配的健康对照个体相比,很大一部分接受颈椎前路减压融合手术的患者在术后11至14年时存在颈部相关身体功能障碍。颈部特定功能而非平衡功能与疼痛在统计学上相关。颈部肌肉耐力受影响最大,三分之一的个体也存在平衡功能障碍。两种手术技术在长期身体功能方面无差异。