1 The Hamlyn Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation , St. Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom .
J Endourol. 2014 May;28(5):532-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0671. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
Surgeons anecdotally report awareness of nontactile sensory cues that compensate for absent haptic feedback in robot-assisted surgery. This study investigates this poorly understood adaptive process by evaluating frequency of in vivo suture damage.
Consecutive cases of children undergoing robot-assisted dismembered pyeloplasty were examined. Suture damage was defined as incomplete (i.e., fraying) or complete (i.e., broken) loss of thread integrity and prospectively recorded with clinical data. Suture technique, size, and robotic instruments used for suturing were subjected to post hoc analysis. Statistical analysis was undertaken using appropriate nonparametric tests.
Overall frequency of suture damage was 2.6% among 1135 sutures used in 52 patients. The mean number of sutures used for cases in this series was 22 (standard deviation±6). There was a significant inverse trend between surgeon experience and suture damage frequency (P=0.014), implying that greater surgeon experience was associated with less suture damage. The impact of experience on suture damage was most apparent when comparing the earliest quartile subgroup (Q1) with the later three quartile subgroups (Q2-Q4) (P<0.001). Plateau of suture damage frequency was seen after approximately 28 cases. Continuous sutures had significantly higher damage frequency compared with interrupted sutures (P=0.022). Significantly higher frequency of suture damage was seen with cases in which forceps instruments were used for suturing compared with paired needle drivers (1.4% vs 7.1%, P<0.001). All events of inadvertent tissue injury involved damage to exposed edges of the renal pelvis (n=5).
Suture damage is likely to be encountered during the learning curve of robot-assisted surgery but decreases with surgeon experience. Preferential use of larger suture size, interrupted sutures, and paired needle driver instruments may help to minimize suture damage. Experience-related perceptual skills that compensate for haptic loss are likely to be acquirable in a preclinical simulation environment.
外科医生在机器人辅助手术中报告了对非触觉感觉线索的感知,这些线索可以弥补触觉反馈的缺失。本研究通过评估体内缝线损伤的频率来研究这一理解甚少的适应过程。
对连续进行机器人辅助离断肾盂成形术的儿童患者进行了检查。缝线损伤定义为缝线完整性的不完全(即磨损)或完全丧失(即断裂),并与临床数据一起进行前瞻性记录。缝线技术、缝线尺寸和用于缝合的机器人器械都进行了事后分析。使用适当的非参数检验进行统计分析。
在 52 例患者的 1135 根缝线中,缝线损伤的总发生率为 2.6%。该系列病例中平均使用的缝线数量为 22 根(标准差±6)。缝线损伤频率与外科医生经验之间存在显著的负相关趋势(P=0.014),这表明经验丰富的外科医生发生缝线损伤的可能性较小。当将最早的四分位组(Q1)与后来的三个四分位组(Q2-Q4)进行比较时,经验对缝线损伤的影响最为明显(P<0.001)。大约进行 28 例手术后,缝线损伤频率达到平台期。连续缝线的损伤频率明显高于间断缝线(P=0.022)。使用器械夹进行缝合的病例与使用配对针持进行缝合的病例相比,缝线损伤的频率显著更高(1.4%比 7.1%,P<0.001)。所有意外组织损伤的事件均涉及肾盂暴露边缘的损伤(n=5)。
机器人辅助手术的学习曲线中可能会遇到缝线损伤,但随着外科医生经验的增加,缝线损伤的发生率会降低。优先使用较大的缝线尺寸、间断缝线和配对针持器械可能有助于减少缝线损伤。通过在临床前模拟环境中获得与经验相关的感知技能,可能有助于弥补触觉的丧失。