Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Mar;93(3):277-86. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12328.
To compare perinatal singleton and multiple outcomes in a large Dutch in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) population and within risk subgroups. Newborns were assigned to a risk category based on gestational age, birthweight, Apgar score and congenital malformation.
Register-based retrospective cohort study.
Netherlands Perinatal Registry data.
A total of 3041 singletons and 1788 multiple children born from IVF/ICSI in 2003-2005.
Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test was used to analyze continuous data, chi-squared analyses were used for categorical data. Multivariate logistic and linear regression analysis was performed to analyze whether the risk stratification criteria were associated with neonatal hospital admission and length of stay.
Start of labor, mode of delivery, gestational age, birthweight, 5-min Apgar score, congenital malformation, neonatal hospital admission, neonatal intensive care unit admission and mortality.
IVF/ICSI-conceived multiples had considerably poorer outcomes than singletons in terms of cesarean section rate, preterm birth, birthweight, being small-for-gestational-age, Apgar score, neonatal hospital admission, neonatal intensive care unit admission and neonatal mortality. As opposed to the results found in the total study population and the low-risk and moderate-risk populations, high-risk multiples showed better outcomes than high-risk singletons regarding cesarean section rate, birthweight and Apgar score. All risk stratification variables were associated with being hospitalized after birth. Length of stay was associated with all risk stratification criteria except Apgar score.
Perinatal outcomes in IVF/ICSI-conceived multiples are considerably poorer than in singletons. This finding mainly pertains to low-risk children. High-risk multiples had significantly better perinatal outcomes than high-risk singletons.
比较大型荷兰体外受精(IVF)/胞浆内精子注射(ICSI)人群及其风险亚组中单胎和多胎的围产儿结局。根据胎龄、出生体重、阿普加评分和先天性畸形将新生儿分配到风险类别。
基于注册的回顾性队列研究。
荷兰围产儿登记处的数据。
2003 年至 2005 年出生的 3041 名单胎和 1788 名多胎的 IVF/ICSI 婴儿。
采用学生 t 检验或曼-惠特尼 U 检验分析连续数据,采用卡方检验分析分类数据。采用多元逻辑回归和线性回归分析来分析风险分层标准是否与新生儿住院和住院时间有关。
临产开始、分娩方式、胎龄、出生体重、5 分钟阿普加评分、先天性畸形、新生儿住院、新生儿重症监护病房入院和死亡率。
IVF/ICSI 受孕的多胎儿在剖宫产率、早产、出生体重、小于胎龄儿、阿普加评分、新生儿住院、新生儿重症监护病房入院和新生儿死亡率方面明显劣于单胎儿。与总研究人群以及低危和中危人群的结果相反,高危多胎儿的剖宫产率、出生体重和阿普加评分优于高危单胎儿。所有风险分层变量均与出生后住院有关。住院时间与所有风险分层标准有关,除阿普加评分外。
IVF/ICSI 受孕的多胎儿的围产儿结局明显劣于单胎儿。这一发现主要适用于低危儿童。高危多胎儿的围产儿结局明显优于高危单胎儿。