Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 5800, Maastricht 6202 AZ, The Netherlands
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 5800, Maastricht 6202 AZ, The Netherlands GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 5800, Maastricht 6202 AZ, The Netherlands.
Hum Reprod. 2015 Jun;30(6):1481-90. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev059. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
Do in vitro fertilization (IVF) multiples generate higher hospital costs than IVF singletons, from birth up to age 5?
Hospital costs from birth up to age 5 were significantly higher among IVF/ICSI multiple children compared with IVF/ICSI singletons; however, when excluding the costs incurred during the birth admission period, hospital costs of multiples and singletons were comparable.
Concern has risen over the long-term outcome of children born after IVF. The increased incidence of multiple births in IVF as a result of double-embryo transfer predisposes children to a poorer neonatal outcome such as preterm birth and low birthweight. As a consequence, IVF multiples require more medical care. Costs and consequences of poorer neonatal outcomes in multiples may also exist later in life.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: All 5497 children born from IVF in 2003-2005, whose parents received IVF or ICSI treatment in one of five participating Dutch IVF centers, served as a basis for a retrospective cohort study. Based on gestational age, birthweight, Apgar and congenital malformation, children were assigned to one of three risk strata (low-, moderate- or high-risk).
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: To enhance the efficiency of the data collection, 816 multiples and 584 singletons were selected for 5-year follow-up based on stratified (risk) sampling. Parental informed consent was received of 322 multiples and 293 singletons. Individual-level hospital resource use data (hospitalization, outpatient visits and medical procedures) were retrieved from hospital information systems and patient charts for 302 multiples and 278 singletons.
The risk of hospitalization (OR 4.9, 95% CI 3.3-7.0), outpatient visits (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.8-3.6) and medical procedures (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.2) was higher for multiples compared with singletons. The average hospital costs amounted to €10 018 and €2093 during the birth admission period (P < 0.001), €1131 and €696 after the birth admission period to the first birthday (not significant (n.s.)) and €1084 and €938 from the second to the fifth life year (n.s.) for multiples and singletons, respectively. Hospital costs from birth up to age 5 were 3.3-fold higher for multiples compared with singletons (P < 0.001). Among multiples and singletons, respectively, 90.8 and 76.2% of the total hospital costs were caused by hospital admission days and 8.9 and 25.2% of the total hospital costs during the first 5 years of life occurred after the first year of life.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Resource use and costs outside the hospital were not included in the analysis.
This study confirms the increased use of healthcare resources by IVF/ICSI multiples compared with IVF/ICSI singletons. Single-embryo transfer may result in substantial savings, particularly in the birth admission period. These savings need to be compared with the extra costs of additional embryo transfers needed to achieve a successful pregnancy. Besides costs, health outcomes of children born after single-embryo transfer should be compared with those born after double-embryo transfer.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was supported by a research grant (grant number 80-82310-98-09094) from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw). There are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article.
Not applicable.
体外受精(IVF)多胎是否比 IVF 单胎从出生到 5 岁的医院总花费更高?
与 IVF/ICSI 单胎相比,IVF/ICSI 多胎的儿童从出生到 5 岁的医院总花费显著更高;然而,当排除出生期间的住院费用后,多胎和单胎的住院费用相当。
人们对 IVF 后儿童的长期结果越来越关注。由于双胚胎移植导致 IVF 中多胎的发生率增加,这使儿童面临较差的新生儿结局,如早产和低出生体重。因此,IVF 多胎需要更多的医疗护理。多胎的新生儿结局较差也可能存在于以后的生活中。
研究设计、规模、持续时间:2003-2005 年在五个参与的荷兰 IVF 中心之一接受 IVF 或 ICSI 治疗的所有 5497 名 IVF 出生的儿童均作为回顾性队列研究的基础。根据胎龄、出生体重、阿普加评分和先天性畸形,将儿童分为三个风险等级(低、中或高风险)。
参与者/材料、设置、方法:为了提高数据收集的效率,根据分层(风险)抽样选择了 816 个多胎和 584 个单胎进行 5 年随访。322 个多胎和 293 个单胎的父母收到了知情同意书。从医院信息系统和患者病历中检索了 302 个多胎和 278 个单胎的个人层面的医院资源使用数据(住院、门诊就诊和医疗程序)。
与单胎相比,多胎的住院(OR 4.9,95%CI 3.3-7.0)、门诊就诊(OR 2.6,95%CI 1.8-3.6)和医疗程序(OR 1.7,95%CI 1.2-2.2)的风险更高。多胎和单胎在出生期间的平均住院费用分别为€10018 和 €2093(P<0.001),出生后至 1 岁生日的期间分别为€1131 和 €696(无显著差异(n.s.)),从 2 岁到 5 岁的期间分别为€1084 和 €938(n.s.)。多胎出生至 5 岁的医院总费用是单胎的 3.3 倍(P<0.001)。多胎和单胎分别有 90.8%和 76.2%的总住院费用是由住院天数引起的,而 5 岁生命年内的总住院费用中,有 8.9%和 25.2%发生在 1 岁以后。
局限性、谨慎的原因:分析中未包括医院以外的资源使用和费用。
这项研究证实了 IVF/ICSI 多胎与 IVF/ICSI 单胎相比,使用医疗保健资源的增加。单胚胎移植可能会带来实质性的节省,尤其是在出生期间。这些节省需要与实现成功妊娠所需的额外胚胎转移的额外成本进行比较。除了成本之外,还需要比较单胚胎转移后出生的儿童与双胚胎转移后出生的儿童的健康结果。
研究资助/利益冲突:本研究由荷兰健康研究与发展组织(ZonMw)提供的研究资助(资助号 80-82310-98-09094)支持。与本文无关的利益冲突。
不适用。