Krämer B, Balser J, Stubbig K, Krämer G, Kübler W
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1986;8 Suppl 11:S46-57. doi: 10.1097/00005344-198511001-00008.
beta 1-Selectivity or beta 1/beta 2-splitting, i.e., the selectivity ratio between the potency of a beta-blocking agent to block beta 1-versus beta 2-mediated responses, was assessed in 16 healthy male volunteers. The study was carried out to an intraindividual, randomized crossover design comparing bisoprolol (0.07 mg/kg i.v.) with the following beta-blocking agents: acebutolol (0.8 mg/kg i.v.), metoprolol (0.2 mg/kg i.v.), penbutolol (0.04 mg/kg i.v.), and propranolol (0.2 mg/kg i.v.). Exercise tachycardia was used as a mainly beta 1-receptor-mediated response: the beta-blocking effect was quantified as a work load ratio after/before beta-blockade for a given heart rate. Decrease in diastolic blood pressure after isoprenaline was used as a mainly beta 2-receptor-mediated response: the beta-blocking effect was quantified as an isoprenaline dose ratio after/before beta-blockade for a decrease in diastolic blood pressure of 25 mm Hg. Assessing the data for a beta 1/beta 2-splitting as 1 for propranolol, the relative beta 1-selectivity (mean +/- SEM) was 12.2 +/- 1.1 for bisoprolol, 9.0 +/- 0.9 for metoprolol, 6.2 +/- 0.6 for acebutolol, and 0.6 +/- 0.06 for penbutolol. There was a significant difference (p less than 0.01) between the cardioselective compounds bisoprolol, metoprolol, and acebutolol on one side, and the nonselective compounds propranolol and penbutolol on the other side. Within the group of nonselective compounds, propranolol and penbutolol differed from each other (p less than 0.05), penbutolol being even less beta 1-selective than propranolol. Within the group of "cardioselective" compounds, bisoprolol and metoprolol appeared to be superior to acebutolol (p less than 0.05). However, it cannot be dismissed that these within-group differences merely reflect the considerable decrease of plasma levels of acebutolol and penbutolol which were observed after ergometric exercise in comparison with the plasma levels after isoprenaline tests.
对16名健康男性志愿者评估了β1选择性或β1/β2分离情况,即β受体阻滞剂阻断β1介导反应与β2介导反应的效能之间的选择性比率。该研究采用个体内随机交叉设计,将比索洛尔(静脉注射0.07mg/kg)与以下β受体阻滞剂进行比较:醋丁洛尔(静脉注射0.8mg/kg)、美托洛尔(静脉注射0.2mg/kg)、喷布洛尔(静脉注射0.04mg/kg)和普萘洛尔(静脉注射0.2mg/kg)。运动性心动过速用作主要由β1受体介导的反应:β受体阻滞作用通过给定心率下β受体阻滞后/前的工作量比率进行量化。异丙肾上腺素后舒张压的降低用作主要由β2受体介导的反应:β受体阻滞作用通过β受体阻滞后/前使舒张压降低25mmHg时异丙肾上腺素剂量比率进行量化。将普萘洛尔的β1/β2分离数据评估为1,比索洛尔的相对β1选择性(均值±标准误)为12.2±1.1,美托洛尔为9.0±0.9,醋丁洛尔为6.2±0.6,喷布洛尔为0.6±0.06。一方面,心脏选择性化合物比索洛尔、美托洛尔和醋丁洛尔与另一方面的非选择性化合物普萘洛尔和喷布洛尔之间存在显著差异(p<0.01)。在非选择性化合物组中,普萘洛尔和喷布洛尔彼此不同(p<0.05),喷布洛尔的β1选择性甚至低于普萘洛尔。在“心脏选择性”化合物组中,比索洛尔和美托洛尔似乎优于醋丁洛尔(p<0.05)。然而,不能排除这些组内差异仅仅反映了与异丙肾上腺素试验后的血浆水平相比,在测力运动后观察到的醋丁洛尔和喷布洛尔血浆水平的显著降低。