• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对难治性社交焦虑障碍的增效和转换策略的双盲随机对照试验。

A double-blind randomized controlled trial of augmentation and switch strategies for refractory social anxiety disorder.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;171(1):44-53. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12101353.

DOI:10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12101353
PMID:24399428
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Most patients remain symptomatic after an initial intervention with approved treatments for generalized social anxiety disorder. This randomized controlled trial provides systematic, prospectively derived data on the relative benefits of "next-step" pharmacotherapies to improve outcomes for individuals with generalized social anxiety disorder who remain symptomatic after initial treatment.

METHOD

This three site, 12-week, double-blind randomized controlled trial compared the relative benefits of three strategies for patients remaining symptomatic (Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale [LSAS] score >50) after a 10-week trial of sertraline alone: the addition of up to 3.0 mg/day of clonazepam (sertraline plus clonazepam), a switch to up to 225 mg/day of venlafaxine, or prolonged sertraline treatment with placebo (sertraline plus placebo).

RESULTS

A total of 397 participants received at least one dose of sertraline; 181 nonresponders (LSAS score >50) at week 10 were randomly assigned to sertraline plus clonazepam, switch to venlafaxine, or sertraline plus placebo. Overall, 21% of patients achieved remission (LSAS score ≤30) at the endpoint, and 27% of patients assigned to sertraline plus clonazepam achieved remission compared with patients assigned to sertraline plus placebo (17%) or venlafaxine (19%), but the differences did not reach significance. Sertraline plus clonazepam was associated with a significantly greater drop in LSAS severity (p=0.020) and disability (p=0.0028) compared with sertraline plus placebo; no significant differences were observed on these parameters between venlafaxine and either sertraline plus placebo or sertraline plus clonazepam. In supplemental analysis, the overall response rate (LSAS score ≤50) was 46%, including a significantly greater proportion of patients in the sertraline plus clonazepam group (56%) compared with the sertraline plus placebo group responding (36%; p=0.027); differences did not reach significance between venlafaxine and sertraline plus placebo or sertraline plus clonazepam.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that the clonazepam augmentation strategy provides relative benefits for sertraline nonresponders in social anxiety disorder.

摘要

目的

大多数患者在接受通用社交焦虑障碍的批准治疗进行初始干预后仍有症状。这项随机对照试验提供了系统的、前瞻性的“下一步”药物治疗数据,以改善初始治疗后仍有症状的通用社交焦虑障碍患者的治疗效果。

方法

这项三地点、为期 12 周、双盲随机对照试验比较了三种策略对接受单独舍曲林治疗 10 周后仍有症状(Liebowitz 社交焦虑量表[LSAS]评分>50)的患者的相对益处:加用最高 3.0 毫克/天的氯硝西泮(舍曲林加氯硝西泮)、换用最高 225 毫克/天的文拉法辛,或延长舍曲林治疗同时使用安慰剂(舍曲林加安慰剂)。

结果

共有 397 名参与者至少接受了一剂舍曲林;10 周时 181 名无应答者(LSAS 评分>50)被随机分配至舍曲林加氯硝西泮、换用文拉法辛或舍曲林加安慰剂。总体而言,21%的患者在终点时达到缓解(LSAS 评分≤30),与舍曲林加安慰剂相比,舍曲林加氯硝西泮组(27%)和文拉法辛组(19%)的患者达到缓解的比例更高,但差异无统计学意义。舍曲林加氯硝西泮与舍曲林加安慰剂相比,LSAS 严重程度(p=0.020)和残疾(p=0.0028)显著降低,而文拉法辛与舍曲林加安慰剂或舍曲林加氯硝西泮相比,这些参数无显著差异。在补充分析中,LSAS 评分≤50 的总体反应率为 46%,包括舍曲林加氯硝西泮组(56%)显著高于舍曲林加安慰剂组(36%)(p=0.027);文拉法辛与舍曲林加安慰剂或舍曲林加氯硝西泮组之间无显著差异。

结论

这些发现表明,氯硝西泮增效策略对社交焦虑障碍中舍曲林无应答者有相对益处。

相似文献

1
A double-blind randomized controlled trial of augmentation and switch strategies for refractory social anxiety disorder.一项针对难治性社交焦虑障碍的增效和转换策略的双盲随机对照试验。
Am J Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;171(1):44-53. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12101353.
2
Efficacy of low and higher dose extended-release venlafaxine in generalized social anxiety disorder: a 6-month randomized controlled trial.低剂量和高剂量缓释文拉法辛治疗广泛性社交焦虑障碍的疗效:一项为期6个月的随机对照试验。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005 Jan;177(3):280-8. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-1957-9. Epub 2004 Jul 16.
3
A randomized controlled trial of venlafaxine extended release in generalized social anxiety disorder.文拉法辛缓释片治疗广泛性社交焦虑障碍的随机对照试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Feb;66(2):238-47. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v66n0213.
4
Treatment in nonresponsive patients with social anxiety: back to the future with benzodiazepines.社交焦虑症无反应患者的治疗:苯二氮䓬类药物回归未来
Am J Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;171(1):1-4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13101304.
5
A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of a flexible dose of venlafaxine ER in adult outpatients with generalized social anxiety disorder.一项针对成年广泛性社交焦虑障碍门诊患者的、采用灵活剂量的缓释文拉法辛的双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004 Oct;24(5):488-96. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000138764.31106.60.
6
Remission rates with venlafaxine extended release in Greek outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder. A double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled study.文拉法辛缓释剂治疗希腊广泛性焦虑障碍门诊患者的缓解率。一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004 Nov;19(6):331-6. doi: 10.1097/00004850-200411000-00003.
7
Efficacy of sertraline in severe generalized social anxiety disorder: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.舍曲林治疗重度广泛性社交焦虑障碍的疗效:一项双盲、安慰剂对照研究的结果
J Clin Psychiatry. 2003 Jul;64(7):785-92. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v64n0708.
8
Efficacy of Venlafaxine ER in patients with social anxiety disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group comparison with paroxetine.文拉法辛缓释剂治疗社交焦虑障碍患者的疗效:与帕罗西汀的双盲、安慰剂对照平行组比较
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2004 Aug;19(6):387-96. doi: 10.1002/hup.602.
9
Venlafaxine extended release in posttraumatic stress disorder: a sertraline- and placebo-controlled study.文拉法辛缓释片治疗创伤后应激障碍:一项与舍曲林和安慰剂对照的研究。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Jun;26(3):259-67. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000222514.71390.c1.
10
Longer term outcomes need to be examined for enhancing the treatment of social anxiety disorder after insufficient improvement with sertraline.对于在舍曲林治疗效果欠佳后如何加强社交焦虑障碍的治疗,需要对更长期的结果进行研究。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2014 May;17(2):50-1. doi: 10.1136/eb-2014-101768. Epub 2014 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
What good are positive emotions for treatment? A replication test of whether trait positive emotionality predicts response to exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder.积极情绪对治疗有什么好处?特质正性情绪是否能预测暴露疗法治疗社交焦虑障碍的反应的复制检验。
Behav Res Ther. 2023 Dec;171:104436. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2023.104436. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
2
The gut microbiome in social anxiety disorder: evidence of altered composition and function.社交焦虑障碍中的肠道微生物组:组成和功能改变的证据。
Transl Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 20;13(1):95. doi: 10.1038/s41398-023-02325-5.
3
Candidate Biological Markers for Social Anxiety Disorder: A Systematic Review.
社交焦虑障碍的候选生物学标志物:系统评价。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 3;24(1):835. doi: 10.3390/ijms24010835.
4
Pharmacological and Physiological Correlates of the Bidirectional Fear Phenotype of the Carioca Rats and Other Bidirectionally Selected Lines.卡里奥卡大鼠及其他双向选择品系双向恐惧表型的药理学和生理学相关性。
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2023;21(9):1864-1883. doi: 10.2174/1570159X20666221012121534.
5
Pharmacotherapy for Anxiety Disorders: From First-Line Options to Treatment Resistance.焦虑症的药物治疗:从一线治疗方案到治疗抵抗
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2021 Jun;19(2):145-160. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20200048. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
6
Pharmacologic predictors of benzodiazepine response trajectory in anxiety disorders: a Bayesian hierarchical modeling meta-analysis.焦虑障碍中苯二氮䓬类药物反应轨迹的药理学预测因素:贝叶斯层次建模荟萃分析。
CNS Spectr. 2023 Feb;28(1):53-60. doi: 10.1017/S1092852921000870. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
7
Incidence of and Characteristics Associated With Long-term Benzodiazepine Use in Finland.芬兰苯二氮䓬类药物长期使用的发生率及特点。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2019029. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19029.
8
Morbid Anxiety: Identification and Treatment.病态焦虑:识别与治疗
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2017 Apr;15(2):136-143. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20160046. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
9
Anxiety Symptoms Questionnaire (ASQ): development and validation.焦虑症状问卷(ASQ):编制与验证
Gen Psychiatr. 2019 Dec 18;32(6):e100144. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2019-100144. eCollection 2019.
10
Benzodiazepine prescription in Ontario residents aged 65 and over: a population-based study from 1998 to 2013.安大略省65岁及以上居民的苯二氮䓬类药物处方:一项1998年至2013年的基于人群的研究。
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2018 Mar;8(3):99-114. doi: 10.1177/2045125317743651. Epub 2017 Dec 5.