Davies D W, Butrous G S, Spurrell R A, Camm A J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1987 May;10(3 Pt 1):519-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1987.tb04515.x.
Atrial premature beats (APBs) which encounter sufficient AV delay may initiate junctional reentry tachycardia (JRT). This form of initiation may be prevented by rendering part of the reentry circuit refractory by artificial stimulation following an APB which would otherwise initiate JRT. Two such approaches have been suggested: preexcitation pacing, that is, ventricular stimulation with a short AV delay triggered by atrial depolarization; and preemptive pacing, which consists of early atrial stimulation coupled to the initiating APB. We compared these approaches and describe them as follows. Ten patients with JRT (six with atrioventricular reentry and four with AV nodal reentry) were studied. Against a background of regular atrial drive, the range of coupling intervals over which a stimulated APB initiated JRT (tachycardia initiation window) was determined (control). The tachycardia initiation window was also measured when a second atrial stimulus followed the initiating APB 20 ms after atrial recovery (preemptive pacing) or when a ventricular stimulus closely followed the initiating APB with an AV delay of 65 ms (preexcitation pacing). The tachycardia initiation window in response to an isolated APB was also assessed following regular AV pacing with a short (65 ms) AV delay (preconditioning pacing) and the effect of preexcitation pacing following the initiating APB was also assessed after a similar drive (combined preconditioning and preexcitation pacing). All protocols were performed at two basic drive cycle lengths. The results are arranged for the slow and fast drives, respectively, and were as follows: control initiating windows--49.5, 28.5 ms; preemptive pacing initiation windows--151, 38 ms; preexcitation pacing initiation windows--26, 23.5 ms; preconditioning pacing initiation windows--45.5, 35 ms; combined preconditioning and preexcitation pacing initiation windows--10.0, 2.5 ms. Whereas preemptive pacing tended to widen the tachycardia initiation windows (a proarrhythmic effect) the combination of preconditioning and preexcitation pacing considerably reduced the possibility of JRT initiation by an atrial premature beat.
遇到足够房室延迟的房性早搏(APB)可能引发交界性折返性心动过速(JRT)。这种引发形式可通过在可能引发JRT的APB之后进行人工刺激,使折返环路的一部分处于不应期来预防。已提出两种这样的方法:预激起搏,即由心房去极化触发的短房室延迟的心室刺激;以及抢先起搏,它包括与引发的APB耦合的早期心房刺激。我们比较了这些方法并作如下描述。对10例JRT患者(6例房室折返性和4例房室结折返性)进行了研究。在规则心房驱动的背景下,确定刺激的APB引发JRT的耦合间期范围(心动过速引发窗口)(对照)。当在心房恢复后20毫秒第二个心房刺激跟随引发的APB时(抢先起搏),或当心室刺激以65毫秒的房室延迟紧跟引发的APB时(预激起搏),也测量心动过速引发窗口。在短(65毫秒)房室延迟的规则房室起搏后(预处理起搏),也评估对孤立APB的心动过速引发窗口,并且在类似驱动后也评估引发的APB之后的预激起搏的效果(联合预处理和预激起搏)。所有方案均在两个基本驱动周期长度下进行。结果分别按慢驱动和快驱动排列,如下:对照引发窗口——49.5、28.5毫秒;抢先起搏引发窗口——151、38毫秒;预激起搏引发窗口——26、23.5毫秒;预处理起搏引发窗口——45.5、35毫秒;联合预处理和预激起搏引发窗口——10.0、2.5毫秒。虽然抢先起搏倾向于拓宽心动过速引发窗口(促心律失常作用),但预处理和预激起搏的联合显著降低了房性早搏引发JRT的可能性。