Suppr超能文献

[在外源性过敏性肺泡炎患者和对照人群中使用鸽、鸡和虎皮鹦鹉的肠道提取物及血清进行的皮内比较试验]

[A comparative intradermal test using intestinal extracts and serum of pigeons, chickens and budgerigars in patients with exogenous allergic alveolitis and in control persons].

作者信息

Müller S, Theise H

出版信息

Z Erkr Atmungsorgane. 1987;168(2):142-8.

PMID:2440192
Abstract

To compare two different sources of bird-antigens (intestinal extracts versus serum dilutions) we performed intracutaneous tests in 79 birdkeepers (34 pigeon-, 20 hen- and 25 budgerigar-keepers) and in nonexposed control persons. The bird-exposed persons were divided into 3 groups: 1. Seropositive patients with extrinsic allergic alveolitis (EAA), 2. seropositive persons without any signs of EAA (sensitized asymptomatics), and 3. exposed seronegative healthy persons. The results of the investigation demonstrate that the early skin-reaction (20 minutes after antigen-application) is nonspecific and do not have any diagnostic value. Most of patients with EAA (65.7%) and 29.6% of sensitized asymptomatics developed a positive 6-hour-(Arthus-) reaction with intestinal extracts, whereas in control groups we have not seen any Arthus reaction. Consequently, we recommend the use of intestinal extracts in the diagnostic procedure of EAA.

摘要

为比较两种不同来源的鸟类抗原(肠道提取物与血清稀释液),我们对79名鸟类饲养者(34名鸽子饲养者、20名母鸡饲养者和25名虎皮鹦鹉饲养者)以及未接触鸟类的对照人员进行了皮内试验。接触鸟类的人员被分为3组:1. 患有外源性过敏性肺泡炎(EAA)的血清阳性患者;2. 无EAA任何体征的血清阳性人员(致敏无症状者);3. 接触鸟类的血清阴性健康人员。调查结果表明,早期皮肤反应(抗原应用后20分钟)是非特异性的,没有任何诊断价值。大多数EAA患者(65.7%)和29.6%的致敏无症状者对肠道提取物产生了阳性6小时(阿瑟斯)反应,而在对照组中我们未观察到任何阿瑟斯反应。因此,我们建议在EAA的诊断过程中使用肠道提取物。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验