Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston2Department of Surgery, UC San Diego Health System, University of California, San Diego.
Department of Surgery, UC San Diego Health System, University of California, San Diego.
JAMA Surg. 2014 Mar;149(3):237-43. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3202.
Interest in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) has grown in recent years, but currently available data are limited. Greater insight into application patterns and outcomes may be gained from a national database inquiry.
To study trends in the use of MIDP and compare the short-term outcomes of MIDP with those of open distal pancreatectomy.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Population-based retrospective cohort study evaluating perioperative outcomes and hospital charge measures for distal pancreatectomy, comparing the surgical approaches and adjusting for patient- and hospital-level factors, among patients undergoing elective distal pancreatectomy from 1998 to 2009 in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample in a 20% stratified sample of all US hospitals.
In-hospital mortality, rates of perioperative complications and splenectomy, total charges, and length of stay.
A total of 8957 distal pancreatectomies were included in this analysis, of which 382 (4.3%) were MIDPs. On a national level, this projected to 42,320 open distal pancreatectomies and 1908 MIDPs. The proportion of distal pancreatectomies performed via minimally invasive approaches tripled between 1998 and 2009, from 2.4% to 7.3%. The groups were comparable for sex and comorbidity profiles, while patients who underwent MIDP were 1.5 years older. On multivariate analysis, MIDP was associated with lower rates of overall predischarge complications, including lower incidences of postoperative infections and bleeding complications, as well as a shorter length of stay by 1.22 days. There were no differences in rates of in-hospital mortality, concomitant splenectomy, or total charges.
This population-based study of MIDP reveals that the application of this approach has tripled in practice and provides strong evidence that MIDP has evolved into a safe option in the treatment of benign and malignant pancreatic diseases.
近年来,人们对微创远端胰腺切除术(MIDP)的兴趣日益浓厚,但目前可用的数据有限。从国家数据库查询中可以更深入地了解应用模式和结果。
研究 MIDP 的应用趋势,并比较 MIDP 与开放式远端胰腺切除术的短期结果。
设计、设置和参与者:这是一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究,评估了 1998 年至 2009 年期间全美 20%分层样本中所有医院的全国住院患者样本中接受择期远端胰腺切除术的患者的围手术期结局和医院收费措施,比较了手术方法,并调整了患者和医院水平的因素。
住院死亡率、围手术期并发症和脾切除术发生率、总费用和住院时间。
共纳入 8957 例远端胰腺切除术,其中 382 例(4.3%)为 MIDP。在全国范围内,预计将有 42320 例开放式远端胰腺切除术和 1908 例 MIDP。1998 年至 2009 年期间,微创方法治疗的远端胰腺切除术比例从 2.4%增加到 7.3%,增加了两倍。两组在性别和合并症方面相似,而接受 MIDP 的患者年龄大 1.5 岁。多变量分析显示,MIDP 与总体出院前并发症的发生率较低相关,包括术后感染和出血并发症的发生率较低,以及住院时间缩短 1.22 天。两组的住院死亡率、同时性脾切除术或总费用无差异。
这项基于人群的 MIDP 研究表明,这种方法的应用已经增加了两倍,并为 MIDP 在治疗良性和恶性胰腺疾病方面已成为一种安全选择提供了有力证据。