• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人保留脾脏的远端胰腺切除术:维罗纳经验

Robotic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: the Verona experience.

作者信息

Esposito A, Casetti L, De Pastena M, Ramera M, Montagnini G, Landoni L, Bassi C, Salvia R

机构信息

Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, P.le Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2021 Jun;73(3):923-928. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00731-8. Epub 2020 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1007/s13304-020-00731-8
PMID:32162271
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The minimally invasive approach in spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy has currently been emphasized in benign and pre-malignant pancreatic diseases. The study aims to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of our technique of robotic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (RSPDP) by a stepwise approach.

METHODS

The data of consecutive patients presented for RSPDP from 2014 to 2019 at Verona University were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical procedure performed, such as Kimura's (KG) or Warshaw's (WG) technique, and then compared.

RESULTS

In the study period, 32 patients underwent RSPDP. Twenty-three patients presented for the Kimura procedure (72%), while nine patients underwent the Warshaw procedure (28%). A higher body mass index was found in the KG (26 ± 4 vs. 22 ± 3, p = 0.037). Regarding the pathological data, the WG group differed in the tumor dimension, and the lymph nodes harvested (30 ± 2 vs. 17 ± 10, 9 ± 5 vs. 3 ± 4, p = 0.0028, and p = 0.005, respectively). Notably, no conversions and mortality were recorded. The overall morbidity was 25% ( eight patients) with no difference between the groups (p = 0.820). The mean length of stay was 8 days, and was similar between the groups (p = 0.350).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that RSPDP is a valid option for the treatment of benign or pre-malignant pancreatic diseases of the distal pancreas, with comparable morbidity with the standard treatment and no mortality. Further research is needed to standardize the technique and to assess the immunological, surgical, and financial benefits of the procedure.

摘要

背景

目前,保留脾脏的微创远端胰腺切除术在良性及癌前胰腺疾病的治疗中备受关注。本研究旨在通过逐步操作的方法,论证我们的机器人保留脾脏远端胰腺切除术(RSPDP)技术的安全性和可行性。

方法

从维罗纳大学一个前瞻性维护的数据库中检索2014年至2019年接受RSPDP的连续患者的数据。根据所实施的手术方式,如木村法(KG)或沃肖法(WG),将患者分为两组,然后进行比较。

结果

在研究期间,32例患者接受了RSPDP。23例患者采用木村术式(72%),而9例患者接受了沃肖术式(28%)。KG组患者的体重指数较高(26±4 vs. 22±3,p = 0.037)。关于病理数据,WG组在肿瘤大小和切除的淋巴结数量方面存在差异(分别为30±2 vs. 17±10,9±5 vs. 3±4,p = 0.0028和p = 0.005)。值得注意的是,未记录到中转手术和死亡病例。总体发病率为25%(8例患者),两组之间无差异(p = 0.820)。平均住院时间为8天,两组之间相似(p = 0.350)。

结论

本研究表明,RSPDP是治疗远端胰腺良性或癌前胰腺疾病的有效选择,其发病率与标准治疗相当,且无死亡病例。需要进一步研究以规范该技术,并评估该手术在免疫、手术及经济方面的益处。

相似文献

1
Robotic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: the Verona experience.机器人保留脾脏的远端胰腺切除术:维罗纳经验
Updates Surg. 2021 Jun;73(3):923-928. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00731-8. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
2
Geographical variation and trends in outcomes of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with or without splenic vessel preservation: A meta-analysis.腹腔镜保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术(保脾术)联合或不联合脾血管保留术的结局的地理差异和趋势:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Sep;45:47-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.07.078. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
3
Minimally invasive vessel-preservation spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy-how I do it, tips and tricks and clinical results.微创保留血管脾脏的胰体尾切除术——我的手术方法、技巧和临床结果。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):7024-7038. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10173-z. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
4
Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with or without splenic vessel conservation: a retrospective study of 20 cases.保留脾脏的腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术伴或不伴脾血管保留:20例回顾性研究
Hepatogastroenterology. 2013 Oct;60(127):1785-8.
5
Robotic Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy: The Warshaw and Kimura Techniques.机器人保脾胰体尾切除术:Warshaw 法和 Kimura 法。
J Vis Exp. 2024 Jul 26(209). doi: 10.3791/65216.
6
Minimally Invasive Approach for Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy: a Comparative Analysis of Postoperative Complication Between Splenic Vessel Conserving and Warshaw's Technique.保留脾脏的远端胰腺切除术的微创方法:保留脾血管技术与华氏技术术后并发症的比较分析
J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Aug;20(8):1464-70. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3141-z. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
7
"Kimura-first" strategy for robotic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: experiences from 61 consecutive cases in a single institution.机器人保脾远端胰腺切除术的“木村优先”策略:单机构连续61例病例的经验
Gland Surg. 2021 Jan;10(1):186-200. doi: 10.21037/gs-20-576.
8
Preliminary experience with a new robotic technique to facilitate distal pancreatectomy with spleen preservation: left lateral approach in right lateral decubitus position.新机器人技术在保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术的初步经验:右侧卧位左侧卧位入路。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1619-1628. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01542-w. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
9
Robotic approach improves spleen-preserving rate and shortens postoperative hospital stay of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a matched cohort study.机器人手术方式提高了腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的脾脏保留率并缩短了术后住院时间:一项配对队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3507-18. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4101-5. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
10
Robotic single-site plus ONE port distal pancreatectomy.机器人单部位加 ONE 端口远端胰腺切除术。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4258-4259. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5476-2. Epub 2017 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing Robotic Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy: Strategies and Innovations to Enhance Safety and Efficacy.优化机器人保留脾脏的远端胰腺切除术:提高安全性和疗效的策略与创新
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Sep 9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18294-6.
2
Nationwide cost-effectiveness and quality of life analysis of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy.全国范围内微创胰体尾切除术的成本效益和生活质量分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5881-5890. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10849-0. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
3
International consensus guidelines on robotic pancreatic surgery in 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Long term outcome after minimally invasive and open Warshaw and Kimura techniques for spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: International multicenter retrospective study.保脾胰体尾切除术微创与开腹 Warshaw 和 Kimura 技术的长期结果:国际多中心回顾性研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;45(9):1668-1673. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
2
Reinforced stapler versus ultrasonic dissector for pancreatic transection and stump closure for distal pancreatectomy: A propensity matched analysis.加强型吻合器与超声刀在胰体尾切除术胰腺离断和残端关闭中的应用:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surgery. 2019 Sep;166(3):271-276. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.02.016. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
3
《2023年机器人胰腺手术国际共识指南》
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Feb 1;13(1):89-104. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-23-132. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
4
Learning curve of robotic-assisted splenic vessel-preserving spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy by one single surgeon: a retrospective cohort study.单外科医生机器人辅助保脾脾血管保留的胰体尾切除术的学习曲线:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Surg. 2023 Dec 19;23(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02294-y.
5
Modified Frailty Index to Assess Risk in Elderly Patients Undergoing Distal Pancreatectomy: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.改良衰弱指数评估老年患者胰体尾切除术风险:一项回顾性单中心研究。
World J Surg. 2022 Apr;46(4):891-900. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06436-2. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
6
Robotic Dual-Console Distal Pancreatectomy: Could it be Considered a Safe Approach and Surgical Teaching even in Pancreatic Surgery? A Retrospective Observational Study Cohort.机器人双控制台胰体尾切除术:在胰腺外科中,它是否可以被认为是一种安全的方法和手术教学手段?一项回顾性观察性研究队列。
World J Surg. 2021 Oct;45(10):3191-3197. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06216-y. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
7
Robotic versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomies: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术用于保留脾脏的远端胰腺切除术:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Pers Med. 2021 Jun 13;11(6):552. doi: 10.3390/jpm11060552.
8
The role of the robot-assisted procedure during total pancreatectomy: a viewpoint.机器人辅助手术在全胰切除术中的作用:一种观点。
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2021 Jun;10(3):405-406. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-21-83.
9
Feasibility and safety of robotic-assisted total pancreatectomy: a pilot western series.机器人辅助全胰切除术的可行性和安全性:一项西方初步系列研究。
Updates Surg. 2021 Jun;73(3):955-966. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01079-3. Epub 2021 May 19.
Laparoscopic hemi-splenectomy.
腹腔镜半脾切除术。
Surg Today. 2018 Jul;48(7):735-738. doi: 10.1007/s00595-018-1639-6. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
4
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a French prospective single-center experience and cost-effectiveness analysis.机器人与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术:法国单中心前瞻性经验及成本效益分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3562-3569. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6080-9. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
5
The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After.国际研究小组(ISGPS)术后胰瘘定义与分级的2016年更新:11年后
Surgery. 2017 Mar;161(3):584-591. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
6
A prospective non-randomised single-center study comparing laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy.一项比较腹腔镜和机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术的前瞻性非随机单中心研究。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Nov;29(11):3163-70. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4043-3. Epub 2015 Jan 1.
7
Improved perioperative outcomes with minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: results from a population-based analysis.微创胰体尾切除术改善围手术期结局:基于人群的分析结果。
JAMA Surg. 2014 Mar;149(3):237-43. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3202.
8
250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility.250 例机器人胰腺切除术:安全性和可行性。
Ann Surg. 2013 Oct;258(4):554-9; discussion 559-62. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a4e87c.
9
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review of comparative studies.腹腔镜与开腹胰体尾切除术的比较:系统综述的比较研究。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr;26(4):904-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2016-3. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
10
Metaanalysis of trials comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomies.微创手术与开腹胰体尾切除术的比较的临床试验的荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2011 May;25(5):1642-51. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1456-5. Epub 2010 Dec 24.