• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创胰腺肿瘤切除术的现状:一项回顾性队列研究。

Current landscape of minimally invasive pancreatectomy for neoplasms: A retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Ngongoni Rejoice F, Mlambo Busisiwe, Shih I-Fan, Li Yanli, Wren Sherry M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, California, USA.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2025 Jan;49(1):241-252. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12408. Epub 2024 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1002/wjs.12408
PMID:39578686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11711114/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate recent minimally invasive pancreatectomy (MIP) trends for neoplastic disease and compare perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

Patients who underwent open (OS) or MIP (laparoscopic-LS or robotic-RS) pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or non-pancreati-coduodenectomy resections (non-PD) were identified from PINC AI Healthcare Database. Outcomes were compared using multivariable regressions.

RESULTS

OS was the predominant approach for PD (87.8%); MIP was more common in non-PD (48.5%) than PD with a substantial RS uptake (11.7%-29.9%). In PDs, outcomes were similar except OS had a longer length of stay (LOS) and lower costs. In non-PDs, MIP patients were less likely to have prolonged LOS, intensive care unit admission, and overall complications than OS. Conversion to OS was lower in the RS approach than LS in PD and non-PD.

CONCLUSIONS

MIP for non-PD has become the most common operative approach with improved outcomes; MIP-PD has flat adoption and similar outcomes to OS. Robotics facilitates MIP (PD and non-PD) completion through fewer conversions to open surgery (OS).

摘要

背景

评估近期微创胰腺切除术(MIP)治疗肿瘤性疾病的趋势,并比较围手术期结果。

方法

从PINC AI医疗数据库中识别出接受开放手术(OS)或MIP(腹腔镜-LS或机器人-RS)胰十二指肠切除术(PD)或非胰十二指肠切除术(非PD)的患者。使用多变量回归比较结果。

结果

OS是PD的主要手术方式(87.8%);MIP在非PD中比PD更常见(48.5%),且机器人手术的采用率较高(11.7%-29.9%)。在PD手术中,除了OS住院时间更长、费用更低外,其他结果相似。在非PD手术中,MIP患者出现住院时间延长、入住重症监护病房和总体并发症的可能性低于OS患者。在PD和非PD手术中,机器人手术转为OS的比例低于腹腔镜手术。

结论

非PD的MIP已成为最常见的手术方式,且结果有所改善;MIP-PD的采用率持平,结果与OS相似。机器人手术通过减少转为开放手术(OS)的次数,促进了MIP(PD和非PD)的完成。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d00a/11711114/b09125263800/WJS-49-241-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d00a/11711114/a37ca86d201a/WJS-49-241-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d00a/11711114/b09125263800/WJS-49-241-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d00a/11711114/a37ca86d201a/WJS-49-241-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d00a/11711114/b09125263800/WJS-49-241-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Current landscape of minimally invasive pancreatectomy for neoplasms: A retrospective cohort study.微创胰腺肿瘤切除术的现状:一项回顾性队列研究。
World J Surg. 2025 Jan;49(1):241-252. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12408. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
2
Initial experience with laparoscopic and robotic surgery for the treatment of periampullary tumours: single institution experience with the first 30 consecutive cases.腹腔镜和机器人手术治疗壶腹周围肿瘤的初步经验:单机构连续30例的经验
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Apr;89(4):E137-E141. doi: 10.1111/ans.15033. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
3
Comparison of surgical outcomes between open and robot-assisted minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy.开腹与机器人辅助微创胰十二指肠切除术的手术效果比较。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Feb;25(2):142-149. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.522. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
4
Robotic-assisted major pancreatic resection and reconstruction.机器人辅助下的胰腺大部切除术及重建术
Arch Surg. 2011 Mar;146(3):256-61. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.246. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
5
Comparing oncologic and surgical outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity-matched analysis.比较机器人和腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的肿瘤学和手术结果:倾向匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5678-5685. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11147-5. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
6
Independent Predictors of Increased Operative Time and Hospital Length of Stay Are Consistent Across Different Surgical Approaches to Pancreatoduodenectomy.不同胰十二指肠切除术手术入路的手术时间和住院时间延长的独立预测因素是一致的。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Nov;22(11):1911-1919. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3834-6. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
7
Safety and feasibility of instituting a robotic pancreas program in the Australian setting: a case series and narrative review.澳大利亚建立机器人胰腺项目的安全性和可行性:病例系列和叙述性综述。
ANZ J Surg. 2024 Jul-Aug;94(7-8):1247-1253. doi: 10.1111/ans.18998. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
8
Laparoscopic versus open pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma: separate propensity score matching analyses of distal pancreatectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy.腹腔镜与开腹胰腺切除术治疗导管腺癌:胰体尾切除术和胰十二指肠切除术的独立倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Apr 9;21(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08117-8.
9
Minimally invasive total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation for chronic pancreatitis: the robotic approach.机器人辅助微创全胰腺切除术联合胰岛自体移植治疗慢性胰腺炎。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3948-3956. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10904-w. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
10
Reduced port minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: single-port laparoscopic versus robotic single-site plus one-port distal pancreatectomy.经皮肾镜碎石取石术:标准通道与微通道经皮肾镜碎石取石术的比较
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):1091-1099. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6361-3. Epub 2018 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumors: a multicenter propensity score-matched comparative study.腹腔镜与开放胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺或壶腹周围肿瘤:一项多中心倾向评分匹配的比较研究
Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):3037-3048. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11677-6. Epub 2025 Mar 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in access to minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancers.胰腺癌微创手术治疗的发展趋势。
HPB (Oxford). 2024 Mar;26(3):333-343. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.11.012. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
2
Comparison of Spleen-Preservation Versus Splenectomy in Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy.微创远端胰腺切除术中保留脾脏与脾切除的比较
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Oct;27(10):2166-2176. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05809-3. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
3
Learning Curves in Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Pancreatic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Proposal of a Standardization.
开放、腹腔镜及机器人胰腺手术的学习曲线:一项系统评价及标准化建议
Ann Surg Open. 2022 Jan 27;3(1):e111. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000111. eCollection 2022 Mar.
4
Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Increased Adoption and Improved Outcomes: Is Laparoscopy Still Justified?机器人胰十二指肠切除术:采用率增加和结局改善:腹腔镜手术是否仍有理由?
Ann Surg. 2023 Sep 1;278(3):e563-e569. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005687. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
5
An assessment of perioperative outcomes for open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy in New York State.纽约州开放性、腹腔镜及机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术围手术期结局评估
J Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec;126(8):1434-1441. doi: 10.1002/jso.27075. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
6
Robotic versus open pancreatic surgery: a propensity score-matched cost-effectiveness analysis.机器人与开放胰腺手术:倾向评分匹配的成本效益分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Aug;407(5):1923-1933. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02471-2. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
7
Learning curves in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: a systematic review.微创胰腺手术中的学习曲线:系统评价。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Sep;407(6):2217-2232. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02470-3. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
8
Multicenter comparison of totally laparoscopic and totally robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: Propensity score and learning curve-matching analyses.多中心腹腔镜与机器人胰十二指肠切除术的比较:倾向评分和学习曲线匹配分析。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022 Mar;29(3):311-321. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1078. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
9
A comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: Propensity score matching analysis.机器人与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Med Robot. 2022 Apr;18(2):e2347. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2347. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
10
Long-Term Quality of Life after Minimally Invasive vs Open Distal Pancreatectomy in the LEOPARD Randomized Trial.LEOPARD 随机试验:微创与开放远端胰腺切除术的长期生活质量比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Dec;233(6):730-739.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.08.687. Epub 2021 Sep 13.