Center for Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems@UniTn, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, 38068 Rovereto, Italy, Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, 38068 Rovereto, Italy, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Center for Visual Science, and Department of Ophthalmology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, and Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215.
J Neurosci. 2014 Jan 8;34(2):574-85. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4032-13.2014.
Actions can be understood based on form cues (e.g., static body posture) as well as motion cues (e.g., gait patterns). A fundamental debate centers on the question of whether the functional and neural mechanisms processing these two types of cues are dissociable. Here, using fMRI, psychophysics, and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), all within the same human participants, we show that mechanisms underlying body form and body motion processing are functionally and neurally distinct. Multivoxel fMRI activity patterns in the extrastriate body area (EBA), but not in the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS), carried cue invariant information about the body form of an acting human. Conversely, multivoxel patterns in pSTS, but not in EBA, carried information about the body motion of the same actor. In a psychophysical experiment, we selectively impaired body form and body motion discriminations by manipulating different visual cues: misaligning the ellipses that made up a dynamic walker stimulus selectively disrupted body form discriminations, while varying the presentation duration of the walker selectively affected body motion discriminations. Finally, a TMS experiment revealed causal evidence for a double-dissociation between neural mechanisms underlying body form and body motion discriminations: TMS over EBA selectively disrupted body form discrimination, whereas TMS over pSTS selectively disrupted body motion discrimination. Together, these findings reveal complementing but dissociable functions of EBA and pSTS during action perception. They provide constraints for theoretical and computational models of action perception by showing that action perception involves at least two parallel pathways that separately contribute to the understanding of others' behavior.
动作可以基于形式线索(例如,静态的身体姿势)和运动线索(例如,步态模式)来理解。一个基本的争论集中在处理这两种类型线索的功能和神经机制是否可分离的问题上。在这里,我们使用 fMRI、心理物理学和经颅磁刺激(TMS),在同一批人类参与者中进行研究,结果表明,处理身体形式和身体运动的机制在功能和神经上是不同的。在外侧枕部身体区(EBA)而不是在后上颞区(pSTS)的多体素 fMRI 活动模式中,携带了关于行为人体的身体形式的不变线索信息。相反,在 pSTS 而不是 EBA 中的多体素模式携带了关于同一演员的身体运动的信息。在一个心理物理学实验中,我们通过操纵不同的视觉线索选择性地削弱了身体形式和身体运动的辨别能力:使构成动态步行者刺激的椭圆不对齐选择性地破坏了身体形式的辨别,而改变步行者的呈现持续时间则选择性地影响了身体运动的辨别。最后,TMS 实验为身体形式和身体运动辨别所基于的神经机制之间的双重分离提供了因果证据:EBA 上的 TMS 选择性地破坏了身体形式的辨别,而 pSTS 上的 TMS 选择性地破坏了身体运动的辨别。总之,这些发现揭示了 EBA 和 pSTS 在动作感知中互补但分离的功能。它们为动作感知的理论和计算模型提供了限制,表明动作感知至少涉及两个平行的途径,它们分别有助于理解他人的行为。