Huang Qi-Fang, Li Yan, Wang Ji-Guang
Centre for Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials, The Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2013 Dec 30;8:79-86. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S38617.
We reviewed the Chinese and English literature for the efficacy and safety data of valsartan monotherapy or combination therapy in Chinese hypertensive patients. According to the data of ten randomized controlled trials, valsartan monotherapy was as efficacious as another angiotensin receptor blocker or other classes of antihypertensive drugs, excepting the slightly inferior diastolic blood pressure-lowering effect in comparison with calcium channel blockers. According to the data of six randomized controlled trials, valsartan combination, with hydrochlorothiazide, amlodipine, or nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system, was more efficacious than monotherapy of valsartan, amlodipine, or nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system. According to these trials, valsartan had an acceptable tolerability, regardless of whether it was used as monotherapy or in combination therapy. Nonetheless, several rare side effects have been reported, indicating that it should still be used with caution. This is of particular importance given that there are millions of hypertensive patients, worldwide, currently exposed to the drug.
我们查阅了中英文文献,以获取缬沙坦单药治疗或联合治疗中国高血压患者的疗效和安全性数据。根据十项随机对照试验的数据,缬沙坦单药治疗与其他血管紧张素受体阻滞剂或其他类别的抗高血压药物疗效相当,但与钙通道阻滞剂相比,其降低舒张压的效果略逊一筹。根据六项随机对照试验的数据,缬沙坦与氢氯噻嗪、氨氯地平或硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统联合使用比缬沙坦、氨氯地平或硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统单药治疗更有效。根据这些试验,无论缬沙坦是用于单药治疗还是联合治疗,其耐受性都可以接受。尽管如此,仍有一些罕见的副作用报道,这表明仍应谨慎使用。鉴于目前全球有数百万高血压患者正在使用该药物,这一点尤为重要。