• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

苯磺酸氨氯地平和缬沙坦对原发性高血压伴蛋白尿患者的肾脏保护作用

[Renal protective effects of benidipine and valsartan in primary hypertension patients with proteinuria].

作者信息

Peng Tao, Hu Zhao, Guo Ling, Yang Xiang-dong, Xia Qing, Li Xian-hua, Jiang Bei, Pei Fei, Song Jian

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2010 Jan;38(1):20-2.

PMID:20398482
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the renal protective effects between calcium channel blocker benidipine and angiotensin II receptor blocker valsartan in primary hypertension patients with proteinuria.

METHODS

A total of 236 patients were divided to low (< 1 g/24 h) and high (1 - 3 g/24 h) proteinuria groups and treated with benidipine (8 mg/d) or valsartan (80 mg/d) for 48 weeks. Blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and 24 h protein were measured at baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks.

RESULTS

Blood pressure was significantly and equally reduced in all treated groups (all P < 0.05 vs. baseline). GFR was also significantly and equally improved in all treated groups after 24 weeks treatments (all P < 0.05 at 24 weeks and 48 weeks). Proteinuria reduction at 24 and 48 weeks was more significant in patients treated with valsartan compared to patients treated with benidipine in low proteinuria group [24 weeks: (0.27 +/- 0.07) g/24 h vs. (0.39 +/- 0.06) g/24 h, P < 0.01; 48 weeks: (0.18 +/- 0.01) g/24 h vs. (0.30 +/- 0.05) g/24 h, P < 0.01].

CONCLUSION

The renal protection efficacy of valsartan and benidipine was similar in primary hypertensive patients with proteinuria.

摘要

目的

比较钙通道阻滞剂贝尼地平与血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂缬沙坦对原发性高血压伴蛋白尿患者的肾脏保护作用。

方法

将236例患者分为低蛋白尿组(<1g/24h)和高蛋白尿组(1-3g/24h),分别给予贝尼地平(8mg/d)或缬沙坦(80mg/d)治疗48周。在基线、12周、24周和48周时测量血压、肾小球滤过率(GFR)和24小时尿蛋白。

结果

所有治疗组血压均显著且同等程度降低(与基线相比,均P<0.05)。治疗24周后,所有治疗组的GFR也均显著且同等程度改善(24周和48周时均P<0.05)。低蛋白尿组中,与贝尼地平治疗的患者相比,缬沙坦治疗的患者在24周和48周时蛋白尿减少更显著[24周:(0.27±0.07)g/24h对(0.39±0.06)g/24h,P<0.01;48周:(0.18±0.01)g/24h对(0.30±0.05)g/24h,P<0.01]。

结论

缬沙坦和贝尼地平对原发性高血压伴蛋白尿患者的肾脏保护疗效相似。

相似文献

1
[Renal protective effects of benidipine and valsartan in primary hypertension patients with proteinuria].苯磺酸氨氯地平和缬沙坦对原发性高血压伴蛋白尿患者的肾脏保护作用
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2010 Jan;38(1):20-2.
2
A comparative study of the renoprotective effects of benidipine and valsartan in primary hypertensive patients with proteinuria.贝尼地平与缬沙坦对原发性高血压合并蛋白尿患者肾脏保护作用的比较研究
Arzneimittelforschung. 2009;59(12):647-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296454.
3
Renal-protective effect of T-and L-type calcium channel blockers in hypertensive patients: an Amlodipine-to-Benidipine Changeover (ABC) study.T型和L型钙通道阻滞剂对高血压患者的肾脏保护作用:氨氯地平转换为贝尼地平的转换(ABC)研究
Hypertens Res. 2007 Sep;30(9):797-806. doi: 10.1291/hypres.30.797.
4
Hong Kong study using valsartan in IgA nephropathy (HKVIN): a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.香港在IgA肾病中使用缬沙坦的研究(HKVIN):一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2006 May;47(5):751-60. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.01.017.
5
Comparison of the antiproteinuric effects of the calcium channel blockers benidipine and amlodipine administered in combination with angiotensin receptor blockers to hypertensive patients with stage 3-5 chronic kidney disease.对3-5期慢性肾病高血压患者联合使用钙通道阻滞剂贝尼地平与氨氯地平和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的抗蛋白尿作用比较。
Hypertens Res. 2009 Apr;32(4):270-5. doi: 10.1038/hr.2009.11. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
6
Proteinuria, chronic kidney disease, and the effect of an angiotensin receptor blocker in addition to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in patients with moderate to severe heart failure.蛋白尿、慢性肾病以及血管紧张素受体阻滞剂联合血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂对中重度心力衰竭患者的影响
Circulation. 2009 Oct 20;120(16):1577-84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.853648. Epub 2009 Oct 5.
7
One-year results of an open-label study on antiproteinuric effect of benidipine in elderly patients with chronic kidney disease.一项关于贝尼地平在老年慢性肾脏病患者中降蛋白尿作用的开放性研究的一年结果。
J Nephrol. 2011 Nov-Dec;24(6):756-63. doi: 10.5301/JN.2011.6383.
8
Two multicenter, 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine and valsartan in combination and as monotherapy in adult patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.两项多中心、为期8周、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究,评估氨氯地平和缬沙坦联合用药及单药治疗对轻度至中度原发性高血压成年患者的疗效和耐受性。
Clin Ther. 2007 Apr;29(4):563-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.03.018.
9
Safety of the combination of valsartan and benazepril in patients with chronic renal disease. European Group for the Investigation of Valsartan in Chronic Renal Disease.缬沙坦与苯那普利联合用药治疗慢性肾病患者的安全性。欧洲缬沙坦治疗慢性肾病研究组。
J Hypertens. 2000 Jan;18(1):89-95.
10
Efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with valsartan plus hydrochlorothiazide compared with amlodipine monotherapy in hypertensive patients with other cardiovascular risk factors: the VAST study.缬沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平单药治疗对伴有其他心血管危险因素的高血压患者的疗效及耐受性比较:VAST研究
Clin Ther. 2005 May;27(5):578-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.05.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Randomized Controlled Trials on Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System Inhibitors in Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 3-5: Are They Robust? A Fragility Index Analysis.3-5期慢性肾脏病中肾素血管紧张素醛固酮系统抑制剂的随机对照试验:这些试验可靠吗?一项脆弱性指数分析。
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 20;11(20):6184. doi: 10.3390/jcm11206184.
2
Overview of clinical use and side effect profile of valsartan in Chinese hypertensive patients.缬沙坦在中国高血压患者中的临床应用及副作用概述。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2013 Dec 30;8:79-86. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S38617.