Chen Jun, Huang Wenhui, Luo Songyuan, Yang Dahao, Xu Zhengrong, Luo Jianfang
Department of Angiocardiopathy, Affiliated Baoan Hospital of Southern Medical University, Shenzhen City, People's Republic of China.
Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:73-8. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S51410. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
To compare the safety, efficacy, and impact on stent graft positioning between rapid artificial cardiac pacing (RACP), induced hypotension and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) induced hypotension during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for Stanford B aortic dissection.
One hundred and sixty-eight patients, who were diagnosed with Stanford B aortic dissection and who underwent selective TEVAR in Guangdong General Hospital and the People's Hospital of Baoan District, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China, were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly divided into a RACP group (n=77) and a SNP group (n=91). During localization and deployment of the stent graft, hypotension was induced by RACP or intravenous SNP, according to randomization. Hemodynamics, landing precision (deviation from planned placement site), duration of procedure, renal function, neurocognitive function, and incidence of endoleaks and paraplegia/hemiplegia were compared. Except for methods of inducing hypotension, TEVAR was performed according to the same protocol in each group.
RACP was successfully performed in all patients assigned to the RACP group. Compared with the SNP group, blood pressure was significantly lower (43±5 versus 81±6 mmHg, P=0.003) and the restoration time of blood pressure and the operation duration were significantly shorter (7±2 versus 451±87 seconds, P<0.001; 87±15 versus 106±18 minutes, P<0.001, respectively) in the RACP group. Stent graft localization/deployment was more precise in the RACP group (2±1 versus 5±2 mm, P<0.001). Compared to baseline, there was no significant change after TEVAR in either group in regard to renal function, neurocognitive function, and incidence of endoleaks and paraplegia/hemiplegia.
RACP can be safely applied to patients undergoing TEVAR for Stanford B dissection. RACP can shorten the operation duration and facilitate precise graft localization/deployment.
比较快速人工心脏起搏(RACP)、诱导性低血压以及硝普钠(SNP)诱导性低血压在斯坦福B型主动脉夹层胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)期间对支架移植物定位的安全性、有效性及影响。
本研究纳入了168例诊断为斯坦福B型主动脉夹层并在广东省人民医院和中国深圳宝安区人民医院接受选择性TEVAR的患者。患者被随机分为RACP组(n = 77)和SNP组(n = 91)。在支架移植物定位和展开过程中,根据随机分组情况,通过RACP或静脉注射SNP诱导低血压。比较血流动力学、着陆精度(与计划放置部位的偏差)、手术持续时间、肾功能、神经认知功能以及内漏和截瘫/偏瘫的发生率。除诱导低血压的方法外,每组TEVAR均按照相同方案进行。
RACP组所有患者均成功实施了RACP。与SNP组相比,RACP组血压显著更低(43±5 vs 81±6 mmHg,P = 0.003),血压恢复时间和手术持续时间显著更短(分别为7±2 vs 451±87秒,P < 0.001;87±15 vs 106±18分钟,P < 0.001)。RACP组支架移植物定位/展开更精确(2±1 vs 5±2 mm,P < 0.001)。与基线相比,两组TEVAR后肾功能、神经认知功能以及内漏和截瘫/偏瘫的发生率均无显著变化。
RACP可安全应用于接受斯坦福B型夹层TEVAR的患者。RACP可缩短手术持续时间并有助于精确的移植物定位/展开。