Suppr超能文献

单侧、无移位、颈椎关节突骨折且无脊髓损伤的手术与非手术治疗的疗效比较:临床研究文章。

Comparative effectiveness of surgical versus nonoperative management of unilateral, nondisplaced, subaxial cervical spine facet fractures without evidence of spinal cord injury: clinical article.

机构信息

Departments of Neurosurgery and.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Mar;20(3):270-7. doi: 10.3171/2013.11.SPINE13733. Epub 2014 Jan 3.

Abstract

OBJECT

Facet joints are major stabilizers of cervical motion allowing for effortless and pain-free multidimensional cervical spine movements without significant linear or rotational translation, thus minimizing any chance for spinal cord or nerve root impingement. Unilateral, nondisplaced subaxial facet fractures do not meet the conventional criteria for spinal instability under physiological loads. Limited evidence indicates that even with no or minimal displacement, 20%-80% of these fractures fail nonoperative management. The risk factors for instability in isolated nondisplaced subaxial facet fractures remain uncertain. In this retrospective study of prospectively collected data, the authors attempted to identify the predictors of failure in the management of isolated, nondisplaced subaxial facet fractures admitted to their Level I trauma center over a 10-year period.

METHODS

Demographic, clinical, imaging, and follow-up data for 25 patients with unilateral nondisplaced subaxial facet fractures who were managed surgically (n = 10) or nonoperatively (n = 15) were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 38 years, 19 were male, and 21 of the fractures were the result of either motor vehicle accidents or falls. The mean motor score on the American Spinal Injury Association scale was 99.2, and the mean Subaxial Injury Classification (SLIC) severity score was 3 (operated 3.5, nonoperated 2.3). Allen mechanistic classification included 22 compressive-extension Stage 1 and 2 distractive-extension Stage 1 fractures. Subaxial facet fractures involved C-7 in 17 patients (68%), C-6 in 7 (28%), and C-3 in 1 (4%). The anatomical plane of fracture through the lateral mass was sagittal in 12 patients, axial in 8, and coronal in 3 patients. Nondisplaced floating lateral mass injuries were noted in 2 patients. The mean instability score, considering 7 components of the discoligamentous complex on MRI, was 3.2 (operated 3.6, nonoperated 3.0). Ten (40%) of 25 patients in this investigation did not have successful management, 9 in the nonoperated and 1 in the operated group (p = 0.018). Unsuccessful management was significantly greater in younger patients (p = 0.0008), possibly indicating selection bias (p = 0.07, Wilcoxon ranksum test). Fracture plane, instability, and SLIC scores did not play a significant role in treatment failure in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, surgery was superior to nonoperative management of isolated, nondisplaced, or minimally displaced subaxial cervical spine facet fractures.

摘要

目的

关节突关节是颈椎运动的主要稳定器,允许在没有明显线性或旋转平移的情况下进行无痛和无痛的多维颈椎运动,从而最大限度地减少脊髓或神经根受压的机会。单侧、无移位的下颈椎关节突骨折不符合生理负荷下脊柱不稳定的传统标准。有限的证据表明,即使没有或仅有微小移位,这些骨折中有 20%-80%无法通过非手术治疗成功。孤立性无移位下颈椎关节突骨折不稳定的危险因素仍不确定。在这项对前瞻性收集数据的回顾性研究中,作者试图确定在 10 年期间在他们的一级创伤中心接受治疗的孤立性、无移位的下颈椎关节突骨折的治疗失败的预测因素。

方法

对 25 例接受单侧无移位下颈椎关节突骨折手术(n=10)或非手术(n=15)治疗的患者的人口统计学、临床、影像学和随访数据进行统计学分析。

结果

患者的平均年龄为 38 岁,19 例为男性,21 例骨折是由机动车事故或跌倒引起的。美国脊髓损伤协会(American Spinal Injury Association)量表上的平均运动评分(motor score)为 99.2,下颈椎损伤分类(Subaxial Injury Classification,SLIC)严重程度评分为 3 分(手术组为 3.5,非手术组为 2.3)。Allen 力学分类包括 22 例压缩-伸展 1 期和 2 例伸展-分离 1 期骨折。颈椎关节突骨折涉及 C-7 17 例(68%),C-6 7 例(28%),C-3 1 例(4%)。骨折通过侧块的解剖平面在 12 例患者中为矢状位,在 8 例患者中为轴向位,在 3 例患者中为冠状位。2 例患者出现无移位的游离侧块损伤。考虑到 MRI 上的椎间盘-韧带复合体的 7 个成分,不稳定评分平均为 3.2(手术组为 3.6,非手术组为 3.0)。本研究中,25 例患者中有 10 例(40%)治疗不成功,非手术组 9 例,手术组 1 例(p=0.018)。年轻患者的治疗失败明显更高(p=0.0008),可能表明存在选择偏倚(p=0.07,Wilcoxon 秩和检验)。在这项研究中,骨折平面、不稳定和 SLIC 评分在治疗失败中没有发挥重要作用。

结论

在这项研究中,手术治疗优于非手术治疗孤立性、无移位或轻微移位的下颈椎关节突骨折。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验