• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

80 岁以上患者创伤性下颈椎骨折后路螺钉固定与前路颈椎间盘切除融合钢板内固定的并发症和 2 年随访结果比较。

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate versus posterior screw fixation after traumatic subaxial fractures in octogenarians: complications and outcomes with a 2-year follow-up.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 May;165(5):1145-1154. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05566-x. Epub 2023 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00701-023-05566-x
PMID:36997809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10140073/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Surgical intervention for management of spinal instability after traumatic subaxial fractures in octogenarians requires a clear consensus on optimal treatments. This study aimed to provide a guide for more efficient management through comparison and assessment of clinical outcomes and complications of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate (pACDF) and posterior decompression fusion (PDF) instrumentation alone in patients aged 80 years.

METHODS

A single institution retrospective review of electronic medical records was undertaken between September 2005 and December 2021. Comorbidities were assessed using the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). Logistic regression was used to identify potential risk factors for ACDF complications.

RESULTS

The rate of comorbidities were similarly high between the pACDF (n=13) and PDF (n=15) groups (pACDF: 8.7 ± 2.4 points vs. 8.5 ± 2.3 points; p=0.555). Patients in the PDF group had significantly longer surgical duration (235 ± 58.4 min vs. 182.5 ± 32.1 min; p<0.001) and significantly higher volumes of intraoperative blood loss (661.5 ± 100.1 mL vs. 487.5 ± 92.1 mL; p<0.001). The in-hospital mortality was 7.7% for the pACDF group and 6.7% for the PDF group. On day 90, the mortality rate increased in both groups from baseline (pACDF: 15.4% vs. PDF: 13.3; p>0.05). Motor scores (MS) improved significantly after surgery in both groups (pACDF: preOP MS: 75.3 ± 11.1 vs. postOP MS: 82.4 ± 10.1; p<0.05; PDF: preOP MS: 80.7 ± 16.7 vs. postOP MS: 89.5 ± 12.1; p<0.05). Statistically significant predictors for postoperative complications included longer operative times (odds ratio 1.2, 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.1; p=0.005) and larger volume of blood loss (odds ratio 1.5, 95% confidence interval 1.2-2.2; p=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Both pACDF and PDF can be considered safe treatment strategies for octogenarians with a poor baseline profile and subaxial fractures as they lead to patients substantial neurological improvements, and they are accompanied with low morbidity and mortality rates. Operation duration and intraoperative blood loss should be minimized to increase the degree of neurological recovery in octogenarian patients.

摘要

简介

对于 80 岁以上老年人创伤性下颈椎骨折后脊柱不稳定的手术干预,需要就最佳治疗方法达成明确共识。本研究旨在通过比较和评估单独使用前路颈椎间盘切除融合术伴钢板(pACDF)和后路减压融合术(PDF)治疗 80 岁以上患者的临床结果和并发症,为更有效的管理提供指导。

方法

对 2005 年 9 月至 2021 年 12 月期间的电子病历进行单中心回顾性分析。使用年龄调整 Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)评估合并症。使用逻辑回归确定 ACDF 并发症的潜在危险因素。

结果

pACDF 组(n=13)和 PDF 组(n=15)的合并症发生率相似(pACDF:8.7±2.4 分 vs. 8.5±2.3 分;p=0.555)。PDF 组的手术时间明显更长(235±58.4 分钟 vs. 182.5±32.1 分钟;p<0.001),术中出血量明显更多(661.5±100.1 毫升 vs. 487.5±92.1 毫升;p<0.001)。pACDF 组的院内死亡率为 7.7%,PDF 组为 6.7%。90 天时,两组的死亡率均较基线时升高(pACDF:15.4% vs. PDF:13.3%;p>0.05)。两组术后运动评分(MS)均显著改善(pACDF:术前 MS:75.3±11.1 分 vs. 术后 MS:82.4±10.1 分;p<0.05;PDF:术前 MS:80.7±16.7 分 vs. 术后 MS:89.5±12.1 分;p<0.05)。术后并发症的统计学显著预测因素包括手术时间延长(优势比 1.2,95%置信区间 1.1-2.1;p=0.005)和出血量增加(优势比 1.5,95%置信区间 1.2-2.2;p=0.003)。

结论

pACDF 和 PDF 均可作为基线较差的下颈椎骨折 80 岁以上老年人的安全治疗策略,因为它们能使患者的神经功能显著改善,同时伴有较低的发病率和死亡率。对于 80 岁以上的患者,应尽量减少手术时间和术中出血量,以提高患者的神经恢复程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9d/10140073/04732d139c86/701_2023_5566_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9d/10140073/3c7504aeda0c/701_2023_5566_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9d/10140073/04732d139c86/701_2023_5566_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9d/10140073/3c7504aeda0c/701_2023_5566_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df9d/10140073/04732d139c86/701_2023_5566_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate versus posterior screw fixation after traumatic subaxial fractures in octogenarians: complications and outcomes with a 2-year follow-up.80 岁以上患者创伤性下颈椎骨折后路螺钉固定与前路颈椎间盘切除融合钢板内固定的并发症和 2 年随访结果比较。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 May;165(5):1145-1154. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05566-x. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
2
ACDF versus corpectomy in octogenarians with cervical epidural abscess: early complications and outcomes with 2 years of follow-up.80 岁以上颈椎硬膜外脓肿患者前路减压融合术与前路椎体次全切除术的比较:2 年随访的早期并发症和结果。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Apr;165(4):875-882. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05488-8. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
3
Pediatric cervical kyphosis in the MRI era (1984-2008) with long-term follow up: literature review.MRI 时代(1984-2008 年)的儿童颈椎后凸:文献回顾。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2022 Feb;38(2):361-377. doi: 10.1007/s00381-021-05409-z. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
4
Comparison between repeat anterior and posterior decompression and fusion in the treatment of two-level symptomatic adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical arthrodesis.颈椎前路融合术后治疗两节段症状性邻接节段病的前路与后路重复减压融合术比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Aug 8;15(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01834-z.
5
Predictors of failure after primary anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for subaxial traumatic spine injuries.下颈椎创伤性脊柱损伤一期前路颈椎间盘切除融合术后失败的预测因素。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Jun;33(6):2332-2339. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08264-z. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
6
Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up.老年颈椎病患者前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与后路减压融合术的比较:3年随访的临床结果及并发症
Brain Spine. 2023 Oct 5;3:102683. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2023.102683. eCollection 2023.
7
Two-level corpectomy versus three-level discectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a comparison of perioperative, radiographic, and clinical outcomes.颈椎脊髓病的两级椎体次全切除术与三级椎间盘切除术:围手术期、影像学及临床结果比较
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Sep;23(3):280-9. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.SPINE14545. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
8
Comparison of clinical and radiographic outcome in instrumented anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with or without direct uncovertebral joint decompression.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术伴或不伴直接钩椎关节减压的临床和影像学结果比较
Spine J. 2004 Nov-Dec;4(6):629-35. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.04.009.
9
Does rigid instrumentation increase the fusion rate in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?在单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术中,使用坚强内固定是否会提高融合率?
Spine J. 2004 Nov-Dec;4(6):636-43. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.04.010.
10
Ambulatory anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is associated with a higher risk of revision surgery and perioperative complications: an analysis of a large nationwide database.门诊前路颈椎间盘切除术和融合术与更高的翻修手术和围手术期并发症风险相关:一项基于大型全国性数据库的分析。
Spine J. 2018 Jul;18(7):1180-1187. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.11.012. Epub 2017 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgery for subaxial cervical spine injuries: which is better: anterior, posterior, or anterior-posterior combined approach?: a systematic review and meta-analysis.下颈椎损伤的手术治疗:前路、后路还是前后联合入路哪种更好?:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Asian Spine J. 2024 Aug;18(4):594-607. doi: 10.31616/asj.2023.0266. Epub 2024 Aug 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk factors for surgical site infection following spinal surgery in Saudi Arabia: A retrospective case-control study.沙特阿拉伯脊柱手术后手术部位感染的危险因素:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Apr 30;100(17):e25567. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025567.
2
Surgical versus conservative treatment of unilateral subaxial non-subluxed facet fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.手术与保守治疗单侧下颈椎未脱位小关节骨折:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Dec;199:106280. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106280. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
3
Comparison of anterior and posterior approaches for treatment of traumatic cervical dislocation combined with spinal cord injury: Minimum 10-year follow-up.
前路与后路治疗创伤性颈椎脱位合并脊髓损伤的比较:至少 10 年随访。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 25;10(1):10346. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67265-2.
4
Cervical spine fragility fractures in older people: 5-year experience at a regional spine centre.老年人颈椎脆弱性骨折:区域性脊柱中心的 5 年经验。
Age Ageing. 2020 Oct 23;49(6):1102-1104. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa088.
5
Is Spinal Surgery Safe for Elderly Patients Aged 80 and Above? Predictors of Mortality and Morbidity in an Asian Population.80岁及以上老年患者的脊柱手术安全吗?亚洲人群死亡率和发病率的预测因素。
Neurospine. 2019 Dec;16(4):764-769. doi: 10.14245/ns.1836336.168. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
6
Accuracy and revision rate of intraoperative computed tomography point-to-point navigation for lateral mass and pedicle screw placement: 11-year single-center experience in 1054 patients.术中 CT 点到点导航用于侧块和椎弓根螺钉置钉的准确性和修正率:1054 例患者 11 年单中心经验。
Neurosurg Rev. 2019 Dec;42(4):895-905. doi: 10.1007/s10143-018-01067-z. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
7
Identifying the associated risks of pneumonia in COPD patients: ARCTIC an observational study.识别 COPD 患者肺炎的相关风险:ARCTIC 观察性研究。
Respir Res. 2018 Sep 10;19(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0868-y.
8
Complications and Readmission After Cervical Spine Surgery in Elderly Patients: An Analysis of 1786 Patients.老年患者颈椎手术后的并发症与再入院情况:1786例患者的分析
World Neurosurg. 2017 Jul;103:859-868.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.109. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
9
Complications and long-term outcomes after open surgery for traumatic subaxial cervical spine fractures: a consecutive series of 303 patients.创伤性下颈椎骨折开放手术后的并发症及长期预后:303例连续病例系列研究
BMC Surg. 2016 Aug 15;16(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0172-z.
10
Intensive care unit capacity in low-income countries: a systematic review.低收入国家重症监护病房的容量:一项系统评价。
PLoS One. 2015 Jan 24;10(1):e0116949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116949. eCollection 2015.