Suppr超能文献

使用传统记录与三维锥形束计算机断层扫描进行上颌阻生尖牙的正畸治疗计划制定

Orthodontic treatment planning for impacted maxillary canines using conventional records versus 3D CBCT.

作者信息

Alqerban Ali, Willems Guy, Bernaerts Christien, Vangastel Jan, Politis Constantinus, Jacobs Reinhilde

机构信息

*Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven & Dentistry, University Hospitals Leuven and.

*Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven & Dentistry, University Hospitals Leuven and

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 2014 Dec;36(6):698-707. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt100. Epub 2014 Jan 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the orthodontic treatment planning for impacted maxillary canines based on conventional orthodontic treatment records versus three-dimensional (3D) information taken from single cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study consisted of 40 individuals with impacted maxillary canines. Patients were identified from among those referred for orthodontic treatment (26 females, 14 males) with a mean age of 12.5 years (± SD 3). In total, 64 impacted canines were identified, justifying the need for CBCT scans by the treating orthodontist. Two sets of information were obtained. The first set consisted of conventional planning records [two-dimensional (2D) panoramic, 2D lateral cephalograms, and dental casts] and the second set of 3D volumetric images obtained from a single CBCT scan (3D panoramic, 3D lateral cephalograms, 3D virtual study model). For both sets, intra- and extraoral images were included. The radiographic diagnostic features, treatment planning, orthodontists' opinions, and case classifications of both sets were produced and subsequently analysed by four orthodontists.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in treatment planning between the use of both sets, in terms of either orthopaedic growth modification or orthodontic compensation. Also, anticipated complications during treatment and expected treatment duration did not differ significantly. Orthodontists found the conventional set to be insufficient for treatment planning in 22.5 per cent and requested additional radiographs needed in 63 per cent of cases, compared with 1.3 and 0.5 per cent, respectively (P < 0.001). The observers' confidence level was higher for therapy based on the 3D set compared with the conventional set (96.3 per cent versus 61.9 per cent, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no statistically significant difference in treatment planning between the use of conventional and CBCT sets. CBCT images have been shown to offer useful orthodontic treatment planning information similar to that of conventional planning with a high confidence level.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较基于传统正畸治疗记录与从单锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)获取的三维(3D)信息制定的上颌阻生尖牙正畸治疗方案。

材料与方法

本研究纳入40例上颌阻生尖牙患者。这些患者是从前来接受正畸治疗的人群中挑选出来的(26名女性,14名男性),平均年龄12.5岁(±标准差3岁)。共识别出64颗阻生尖牙,这使得主治正畸医生有理由进行CBCT扫描。获取了两组信息。第一组包括传统规划记录[二维(2D)全景片、2D侧位头影测量片和石膏模型],第二组是从单次CBCT扫描获得的3D容积图像(3D全景片、3D侧位头影测量片、3D虚拟研究模型)。两组均包括口内和口外图像。由四位正畸医生生成并随后分析两组的影像学诊断特征、治疗方案、正畸医生的意见和病例分类。

结果

就正畸生长改良或正畸代偿而言,两组在治疗方案上无统计学显著差异。此外,治疗期间预期的并发症和预期治疗时间也无显著差异。正畸医生发现传统资料在22.5%的病例中不足以用于治疗方案制定,63%的病例需要额外的X光片,相比之下,基于3D资料的这两个比例分别为1.3%和0.5%(P<0.001)。与传统资料相比,观察者对基于3D资料的治疗的信心水平更高(96.3%对61.9%,P<0.001)。

结论

使用传统资料和CBCT资料进行治疗方案制定无统计学显著差异。CBCT图像已被证明能提供与传统规划相似的、具有高信心水平的有用正畸治疗规划信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验