Polizzi Alessandro, Serra Sara, Leonardi Rosalia
Department of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 18;13(22):6941. doi: 10.3390/jcm13226941.
: The present scoping review aims to provide a panoramic view of the current state of knowledge, highlighting the strengths, limitations, and future directions, on the use of CBCT in orthodontic practice. : This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines to identify eligible studies from the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The research question was formulated as follows: "What is the scientific evidence concerning the preferential use of 3D CBCT over 2D radiography in orthodontics"? : Through database searching, 521 records were identified, and ultimately, 37 studies that compared 3D CBCT with 2D conventional radiography were included. Of these, 16 articles regarded the use of CBCT for cephalometric analysis, 5 papers analyzed the evaluation of root resorption, 10 studies evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of root angulation and determining tooth position, and the remaining 6 articles were conducted for miscellaneous applications: determining the size of the nasopharyngeal airway (n = 2), miniscrew positioning (n = 1), estimating cervical vertebrae maturity (n = 1), and evaluating the correctness of the root location when placing digital indirect brackets (n = 1). : The choice between 3D CBCT or CBCT-generated radiography and conventional 2D radiography in orthodontics involves careful consideration of the specific clinical context, the complexity of the case, and the balance between the diagnostic advantages and the associated limitations. : Future studies with a prospective design and standardized imaging protocols are encouraged to facilitate the development of a consensus on the best practices.
本综述旨在全面呈现锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)在正畸实践中的应用现状,突出其优势、局限性及未来发展方向。
本研究遵循系统评价与Meta分析扩展版的范围综述(PRISMA-ScR)指南,从以下数据库中筛选符合条件的研究:PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science。研究问题表述如下:“正畸领域中,关于优先使用三维CBCT而非二维放射成像的科学证据有哪些?”
通过数据库检索,共识别出521条记录,最终纳入37项比较三维CBCT与二维传统放射成像的研究。其中,16篇文章涉及CBCT在头影测量分析中的应用,5篇论文分析了牙根吸收的评估,10项研究评估了牙根角度诊断准确性及牙齿位置确定情况,其余6篇文章涉及其他应用:确定鼻咽气道大小(n = 2)、微螺钉定位(n = 1)、评估颈椎成熟度(n = 1)以及评估放置数字化间接托槽时牙根位置的正确性(n = 1)。
正畸中三维CBCT或CBCT生成的放射成像与传统二维放射成像之间的选择,需要仔细考虑具体临床情况、病例复杂性以及诊断优势与相关局限性之间的平衡。
鼓励开展前瞻性设计和标准化成像方案的未来研究,以促进就最佳实践达成共识。