1Division of Physiotherapy, School of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia 2Brighton Rehabilitation Unit, Metro North Hospital & Health Service, Brighton, Queensland, Australia.
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2014 Apr-Jun;37(2):92-8. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0b013e3182abe79e.
Patients undertaking inpatient rehabilitation comprise a diverse group, including patients with stroke and other neurological conditions, patients who have fallen with or without a resulting fracture, and patients with joint replacements, general debility, or various cardiopulmonary conditions. It is not clear whether diagnosis has an impact on discharge destination in a heterogeneous patient group. The purpose of this study was to determine whether diagnostic category matters or whether it is rehabilitation length of stay (LOS), ability on the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), or Balance Outcome Measure for Elder Rehabilitation (BOOMER) at discharge that predicts discharge destination in elderly patients undergoing rehabilitation who had previously lived at home.
A retrospective audit was undertaken at a single rehabilitation facility in South East Queensland, Australia, that serviced 4 local short-term care hospitals. Participants were admitted consecutively to the facility between June 2010 and March 2012 who met inclusion criteria. These included a primary diagnosis category of orthopedic conditions, debility, stroke, and other neurological conditions according to the Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre and older than 60 years (n = 248). Interventions while being a rehabilitation inpatient comprised usual care physiotherapy individually tailored and incorporating elements of balance, strengthening, and functional exercise. Main outcome measures were discharge to residential aged care facility (RACF) versus home, differences between diagnostic categories in terms of discharge destination, LOS, and performance on outcome measures. Prediction of discharge destination by LOS, 10MWT, and BOOMER performance at discharge was explored.
A total of 28 patients (12.3%) were discharged to RACF. Diagnosis was not correlated with discharge destination (Pearson χ2 = 1.26, P = .74). The variables rehabilitation LOS, an inability to perform the 10MWT at discharge, and discharge BOOMER score of less than 4 can predict discharge destination with 86.4% accuracy (P = .002). This model had a sensitivity of 71.4% (discharge to RACF) and specificity of 93.3% (discharge home).
To return home after rehabilitation, patients need to be able to walk at least 10 m and undertake tasks such as moving from sitting to standing, turning around, as well as managing steps. The study revealed that a standardized suite of measures of functional ability and balance may not be appropriate for patients in all diagnostic categories undergoing rehabilitation. Therefore, just as intervention needs to be tailored for the individual patient, the measure of their progress also should be unique.
接受住院康复治疗的患者包括多种人群,其中包括中风和其他神经系统疾病患者、有或没有骨折的跌倒患者、关节置换患者、身体虚弱患者或各种心肺疾病患者。目前尚不清楚诊断是否会影响异质患者群体的出院去向。本研究旨在确定诊断类别是否重要,或者是否是康复住院时间(LOS)、10 米步行测试(10MWT)的能力或老年康复平衡结果测量(BOOMER)在出院时预测在以前居住在家庭中的接受康复治疗的老年患者的出院去向。
在澳大利亚东南部昆士兰州的一家单一康复机构进行了回顾性审计,该机构为当地 4 家短期护理医院提供服务。2010 年 6 月至 2012 年 3 月期间,符合纳入标准的患者连续入住该机构。这些标准包括根据澳大拉西亚康复结果中心的分类为骨科疾病、虚弱、中风和其他神经系统疾病的主要诊断类别,以及年龄大于 60 岁(n = 248)。康复住院期间的干预措施包括单独进行的常规物理治疗,并结合平衡、增强和功能锻炼等元素。主要结局指标为出院到养老院(RACF)与出院回家,不同诊断类别在出院去向、住院时间和结果测量表现方面的差异。探讨了出院时间、10MWT 和 BOOMER 出院时的表现对出院去向的预测。
共有 28 名患者(12.3%)出院到 RACF。诊断与出院去向无相关性(Pearson χ2 = 1.26,P =.74)。康复 LOS、无法在出院时进行 10MWT 以及出院时的 BOOMER 评分小于 4 等变量可以以 86.4%的准确率预测出院去向(P =.002)。该模型的灵敏度为 71.4%(出院到 RACF),特异性为 93.3%(出院回家)。
要在康复后出院回家,患者需要能够至少行走 10 米,并能够进行从坐到站、转身、上下台阶等任务。研究表明,对于接受康复治疗的所有诊断类别患者,一套标准化的功能能力和平衡测量可能并不合适。因此,就像干预措施需要针对个体患者进行调整一样,他们进展的衡量标准也应该是独特的。