• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施多模式家庭康复干预措施以替代住院老年康复(GeRas):早期定性过程评价。

Implementation of a multimodal home-based rehabilitation intervention after discharge from inpatient geriatric rehabilitation (GeRas): an early qualitative process evaluation.

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of Clinical Gerontology, Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2024 Aug 29;24(1):720. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05277-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-024-05277-7
PMID:39210258
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11363644/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Geriatric rehabilitation aims at increasing physical and social activity and maintaining the functional reserve of older people. However, the continuity of geriatric rehabilitation in the outpatient setting is limited due to a lack of structured aftercare programs. In order to overcome this, a three-month multimodal home-based intervention program (GeRas) was implemented. The aim of this early qualitative process evaluation was to assess GeRas in terms of perceived reach, effectiveness/efficacy, adoption/uptake, implementation, and maintenance/sustainability (Domains within the RE-AIM Framework) from the perspective of patients who received the intervention and healthcare providers who were involved in the delivery of the intervention.

METHODS

In a qualitative process evaluation, 13 healthcare providers and 10 patients were interviewed throughout the beginning of the implementation period of GeRas to capture early experiences using a semi-structured interview guide. The interview guide and qualitative content analysis was guided by the RE-AIM Framework.

RESULTS

The GeRas program was perceived to be largely well implemented and beneficial by healthcare providers and patients. According to healthcare providers, GeRas showed more advantages compared to usual care. Additionally, outcome expectations were mainly met (Domain 1: Effectiveness). However, the implementation of the intervention delivered via the eHealth system was perceived as challenging (Domain 2: Adoption). Nevertheless, the outpatient physical exercise, the outpatient counselling, and the continuous care after discharge improved perceived well-being regardless of the intervention type (Domain 3: Implementation). To facilitate the continued use of GeRas, technical requirements should be created to increase user-friendliness and to motivate patients to continue the training in the long term (Domain 4: Maintenance).

CONCLUSION

Although initial experiences with the implementation and effectiveness of GeRas were positive in general, organisational and technical issues need to be resolved to enhance sustainable and successful implementation of the GeRas program.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00029559). Registered 5/10/2022.

摘要

背景

老年康复旨在增加身体和社会活动,并维持老年人的功能储备。然而,由于缺乏结构化的康复后护理计划,门诊老年康复的连续性受到限制。为了克服这一问题,实施了一项为期三个月的多模式家庭干预计划(GeRas)。本项早期定性过程评估的目的是从接受干预的患者和参与干预实施的医疗保健提供者的角度,根据可感知的覆盖范围、效果/疗效、采用/接受、实施和维持/可持续性(RE-AIM 框架内的领域)评估 GeRas。

方法

在定性过程评估中,在 GeRas 实施初期,对 13 名医疗保健提供者和 10 名患者进行了访谈,使用半结构化访谈指南来获取早期经验。访谈指南和定性内容分析以 RE-AIM 框架为指导。

结果

医疗保健提供者和患者普遍认为 GeRas 计划实施得很好,并且对患者有益。根据医疗保健提供者的说法,GeRas 与常规护理相比具有更多优势。此外,主要实现了预期的结果(领域 1:效果)。然而,通过电子医疗系统实施干预措施被认为具有挑战性(领域 2:采用)。尽管如此,门诊物理治疗、门诊咨询和出院后的持续护理,无论干预类型如何,都改善了患者的幸福感(领域 3:实施)。为了促进 GeRas 的持续使用,应创建技术要求以提高用户友好性,并激励患者长期进行培训(领域 4:维持)。

结论

尽管总体上对 GeRas 的实施和效果的初步经验是积极的,但需要解决组织和技术问题,以增强 GeRas 计划的可持续和成功实施。

试验注册

德国临床试验注册处(DRKS00029559)。注册于 2022 年 5 月 10 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4329/11363644/63d015bd87d6/12877_2024_5277_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4329/11363644/63d015bd87d6/12877_2024_5277_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4329/11363644/63d015bd87d6/12877_2024_5277_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation of a multimodal home-based rehabilitation intervention after discharge from inpatient geriatric rehabilitation (GeRas): an early qualitative process evaluation.实施多模式家庭康复干预措施以替代住院老年康复(GeRas):早期定性过程评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Aug 29;24(1):720. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05277-7.
2
Multimodal home-based rehabilitation intervention after discharge from inpatient geriatric rehabilitation (GeRas): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.多模态家庭为基础的康复干预出院后住院老年康复(Geras):一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jan 17;24(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04634-2.
3
The role of patient-related factors in the implementation of a multimodal home-based rehabilitation intervention after discharge from inpatient geriatric rehabilitation (GeRas): a qualitative process evaluation.患者相关因素在老年住院康复(GeRas)出院后多模式家庭康复干预实施中的作用:一项质性过程评估
Eur Geriatr Med. 2024 Oct;15(5):1369-1382. doi: 10.1007/s41999-024-01027-5. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
4
The Geras virtual frailty rehabilitation program to build resilience in older adults with frailty during COVID-19: a randomized feasibility trial.Geras虚拟衰弱康复计划:在COVID-19期间增强衰弱老年人的恢复力——一项随机可行性试验
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Jul 17;9(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01346-7.
5
Physiotherapy rehabilitation after total knee or hip replacement: an evidence-based analysis.全膝关节或髋关节置换术后的物理治疗康复:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005;5(8):1-91. Epub 2005 Jun 1.
6
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.行为修正干预对初级保健中无法用医学解释的症状:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460.
7
Evaluation of the implementation of information system for postdischarge with the theoretical domains framework by healthcare professionals: a multistage design with qualitative inquiry and Delphi expert discussion protocol.运用理论领域框架评估医疗保健专业人员实施出院后信息系统的情况:采用多阶段设计的定性研究和德尔菲专家讨论方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 10;11(12):e046081. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046081.
8
CHERISH (collaboration for hospitalised elders reducing the impact of stays in hospital): protocol for a multi-site improvement program to reduce geriatric syndromes in older inpatients.CHERISH(住院老年人减少住院影响协作组):一项多中心改进项目的方案,旨在减少老年住院患者的老年综合征
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Jan 9;17(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0399-7.
9
Assessing Digital Health Implementation for a Pediatric Chronic Pain Intervention: Comparing the RE-AIM and BIT Frameworks Against Real-World Trial Data and Recommendations for Future Studies.评估儿科慢性疼痛干预的数字健康实施情况:将 RE-AIM 和 BIT 框架与真实世界试验数据进行比较,并为未来研究提出建议。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 1;22(9):e19898. doi: 10.2196/19898.
10
The design elements of outpatient geriatric rehabilitation from patient, healthcare professional, and organizational perspective; a qualitative study.从患者、医护专业人员和组织角度看门诊老年康复的设计要素;一项定性研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2025 Apr;47(7):1688-1696. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2377818. Epub 2024 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
eHealth in geriatric rehabilitation: an international consensus study.老年康复中的电子健康:一项国际共识研究。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 Mar 21. doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01170-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Multimodal home-based rehabilitation intervention after discharge from inpatient geriatric rehabilitation (GeRas): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.多模态家庭为基础的康复干预出院后住院老年康复(Geras):一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jan 17;24(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04634-2.
2
"A disembodied voice over the telephone": a qualitative study of healthcare practitioners' experiences in geriatric medicine.电话那头传来一个不带感情的声音:老年医学医疗从业者体验的定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 May 5;23(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03909-y.
3
The need for rehabilitation services in the WHO European Region is substantial and growing.
世卫组织欧洲区域对康复服务的需求巨大且不断增长。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Dec 6;24:100550. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100550. eCollection 2023 Jan.
4
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.基于用户反馈的更新的实施研究综合框架。
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.
5
Quo vadis geriatric rehabilitation?老年康复何去何从?
Age Ageing. 2022 Jun 1;51(6). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac040.
6
Does physical exercise improve the capacity for independent living in people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.体育锻炼是否能提高痴呆或轻度认知障碍患者的独立生活能力:系统评价和荟萃分析概述。
Aging Ment Health. 2022 Dec;26(12):2317-2327. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2021.2019192. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
7
Reablement professionals' perspectives on client characteristics and factors associated with successful home-based reablement: a qualitative study.康复专业人员对客户特征和与家庭康复成功相关因素的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 6;21(1):665. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06625-8.
8
The role of personalised professional relations across care sectors in achieving high continuity of care.在实现高连续性护理方面,个性化专业关系在各护理领域的作用。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Apr 14;22(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01418-8.
9
Key Factors Associated with Adherence to Physical Exercise in Patients with Chronic Diseases and Older Adults: An Umbrella Review.与慢性病和老年人坚持身体锻炼相关的主要因素:伞式综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 19;18(4):2023. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042023.
10
Factors affecting the delivery of complex rehabilitation interventions in research with neurologically impaired adults: a systematic review.影响神经功能障碍成年人康复干预措施实施的因素:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 25;9(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01508-1.