Kushner David S, Peters Kenneth M, Johnson-Greene Doug
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.
Therapy Operations, HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital, Miami, FL.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Jul;96(7):1310-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
To evaluate the Siebens Domain Management Model (SDMM) for geriatric inpatient rehabilitation (IR) to increase functional independence and dispositions to home.
Before and after study.
IR facility.
During 2010 (preintervention), 429 patients aged ≥75 years who were on average admitted to IR 8.2 days postacute care, and during 2012 (postintervention), 524 patients aged ≥75 years who were on average admitted to IR 5.5 days postacute care. Case-mix group (CMG) comorbidity tier severity, preadmission living setting, and living support were similar in both groups.
The SDMM involving weekly adjustments of IR care focused on potential barriers to discharge home.
FIM efficiency, length of stay (LOS), and disposition rates to community/home, acute care, and long-term care (LTC) to compare pre-/postintervention facility data and comparison of facility to national CMG-adjusted data from the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation for both years (2010/2012).
Pre-/postintervention group admission FIM scores were similar (t=2.96, P<.003), but the preintervention group had on average 2.6 days greater LOS during IR and greater time to onset of IR (8.2 vs 5.5d) from acute care. Preintervention FIM efficiency was 2.1, whereas postintervention FIM efficiency was 2.76, a significant difference (t=4.1, P<.0001). There were significantly more discharges to the community in the postintervention group (74.4%) than the preintervention group (58.5%, χ(2)=26.2, P<.0001). There were significantly fewer patients discharged to LTC in the postintervention group (χ(2)=30.47, P<.0001). The preintervention group did not significantly differ from the 2010 national data, but the postintervention group significantly differed from the 2012 national data for both greater FIM efficiency (t=-5.5, P<.0001) and greater discharge to community (χ(2)=34, P<.0001). LOS decreased by 2.6 days in the postintervention group compared with the preintervention group, whereas LOS decreased by only 0.6 days nationally from 2010 to 2012, a significant difference with postintervention LOS lower than the national data (t=31.1, P<.0001).
Use of the SDMM during IR in geriatric patients is associated with increased functional independence and discharges to home/community and reduced institutionalization.
评估用于老年住院康复(IR)的七领域管理模型(SDMM),以提高功能独立性并增加回家的处置率。
前后对照研究。
康复机构。
2010年(干预前),429名年龄≥75岁的患者,急性护理后平均8.2天入住康复机构;2012年(干预后),524名年龄≥75岁的患者,急性护理后平均5.5天入住康复机构。两组的病例组合组(CMG)合并症分级严重程度、入院前生活环境和生活支持相似。
SDMM包括每周调整康复护理,重点关注出院回家的潜在障碍。
FIM效率、住院时间(LOS)以及社区/家庭、急性护理和长期护理(LTC)的处置率,以比较干预前后的机构数据,并将机构数据与这两年(2010/2012)医疗康复统一数据系统中全国CMG调整后的数据进行比较。
干预前后组的入院FIM评分相似(t=2.96,P<.003),但干预前组在康复期间的平均住院时间长2.6天,从急性护理到开始康复的时间更长(8.2天对5.5天)。干预前FIM效率为2.1,而干预后FIM效率为2.76,差异有统计学意义(t=4.1,P<.0001)。干预后组出院至社区的人数显著多于干预前组(74.4%对58.5%,χ(2)=26.2,P<.0001)。干预后组出院至长期护理机构的患者显著减少(χ(2)=30.47,P<.0001)。干预前组与2010年全国数据无显著差异,但干预后组在FIM效率更高(t=-5.5,P<.0001)和出院至社区比例更高(χ(2)=34,P<.0001)方面与2012年全国数据有显著差异。与干预前组相比,干预后组的住院时间减少了2.6天,而从2010年到2012年全国住院时间仅减少了0.6天,干预后住院时间低于全国数据,差异有统计学意义(t=31.1,P<.0001)。
在老年患者康复期间使用SDMM与功能独立性增加、出院回家/社区以及机构化减少相关。