• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知发展的新观点。

New views on cognitive development.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Youth Adolesc. 1976 Jun;5(2):113-29. doi: 10.1007/BF01537487.

DOI:10.1007/BF01537487
PMID:24408024
Abstract

Recent empirical findings viewed from a cognitive developmental perspective suggest new interpretive stances toward three familiar themes -the fears of infancy, the discontinuous quality of stages in cognitive functioning, and the capacity for resilience in cognitive development. (1) Time of onset and decline of separation anxiety in infants are primarily a function of the infant's level of cognitive development rather than variation in interactive experiences with the caretaker. (2) Cognitive competences seem to be severely limited to specific problem contexts, and we should not talk of competences in the abstract. Hence stages should be viewed as continuous and gradual. (3) Young mammals seem to retain a capacity for recovery from early experiences that retard normal development if they are fortunate enough to be moved to a more benign context.

摘要

从认知发展的角度来看,最近的实证研究结果表明,对于三个熟悉的主题——婴儿期的恐惧、认知功能阶段的不连续性以及认知发展的弹性能力——可以采取新的解释立场。(1)婴儿分离焦虑的开始和消退时间主要是婴儿认知发展水平的函数,而不是与照顾者互动体验的变化。(2)认知能力似乎严重局限于特定的问题情境,我们不应该抽象地谈论能力。因此,阶段应该被视为连续的和渐进的。(3)如果幸运的话,年幼的哺乳动物能够从阻碍正常发育的早期经历中恢复过来,因为它们被转移到一个更良性的环境中。

相似文献

1
New views on cognitive development.认知发展的新观点。
J Youth Adolesc. 1976 Jun;5(2):113-29. doi: 10.1007/BF01537487.
2
Effects of Early Vocal Contact in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Study Protocol for a Multi-Centre, Randomised Clinical Trial.早期在新生儿重症监护病房进行声音接触的效果:一项多中心随机临床试验的研究方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 8;18(8):3915. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083915.
3
Developmental pathways for social understanding: linking social cognition to social contexts.社会理解的发展路径:将社会认知与社会情境相联系。
Front Psychol. 2015 May 29;6:719. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00719. eCollection 2015.
4
Alterations in biochemical markers due to mercury (Hg) exposure and its influence on infant's neurodevelopment.汞(Hg)暴露导致的生化标志物改变及其对婴儿神经发育的影响。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2016 Nov;219(8):898-914. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 2.
5
The connection between cognitive development and specific fears and worries in normal children and children with below-average intellectual abilities: a preliminary study.正常儿童及智力低于平均水平儿童的认知发展与特定恐惧和担忧之间的联系:一项初步研究。
Behav Res Ther. 2002 Jan;40(1):37-56. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(00)00115-7.
6
Infant's action skill dynamically modulates parental action demonstration in the dyadic interaction.婴儿的动作技能在二元互动中动态调节父母的动作示范。
Dev Sci. 2015 Nov;18(6):1006-13. doi: 10.1111/desc.12270. Epub 2014 Dec 7.
7
These are the people in your neighbourhood: Consistency and persistence in infants' exposure to caregivers', relatives', and strangers' faces across contexts.这些是你邻里中的人群:婴儿在不同情境下接触照顾者、亲属和陌生人面孔时的一致性和持续性。
Vision Res. 2019 Apr;157:230-241. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
8
The form of early development. Continuity and discontinuity in emergent competences.早期发展的形式。新兴能力中的连续性与非连续性。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1979 Sep;36(10):1047-54. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1979.01780100017001.
9
Dyadic co-regulation, affective intensity and infant's development at 12 months: A comparison among extremely preterm and full-term dyads.二元共同调节、情感强度与12个月婴儿的发育:极早产儿与足月儿二元组的比较。
Infant Behav Dev. 2015 Aug;40:29-40. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 May 25.
10
Non-organic failure to thrive: a developmental perspective.非器质性生长发育不良:一种发育视角
Pediatr Ann. 1984 Nov;13(11):829-35, 838, 840-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Response No. 2 to Dr. Kagan's Article: Changing ideas about irreversible childhood experiences and personality - Discussion of emergent cognitive themes in human development.对卡根博士文章的回应之二:关于不可逆童年经历与个性的观念转变——对人类发展中新兴认知主题的探讨
J Youth Adolesc. 1976 Jun;5(2):137-44. doi: 10.1007/BF01537489.
2
Response no. 1 to Dr. Kagan's article.对卡根博士文章的第一份回应。
J Youth Adolesc. 1976 Jun;5(2):131-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01537488.
3
Annual Research Review: Positive adjustment to adversity--trajectories of minimal-impact resilience and emergent resilience.

本文引用的文献

1
PERSPECTIVES ON PERSONALITY CONSISTENCY AND CHANGE FROM THE GUIDANCE STUDY.从指导研究看人格的一致性与变化
Vita Hum Int Z Lebensalterforsch. 1964;7:115-26. doi: 10.1159/000270072.
2
The response of the human newborn to visual movement.人类新生儿对视觉运动的反应。
J Exp Child Psychol. 1966 Jun;3(3):235-43. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(66)90067-1.
3
Effect of visual deprivation during postnatal maturation on the electroencephalogram of the cat.出生后发育期间视觉剥夺对猫脑电图的影响。
年度研究综述:逆境中的积极调整——低冲击韧性和新兴韧性的轨迹。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;54(4):378-401. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12021. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
Exp Neurol. 1966 Feb;14(2):224-37. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(66)90008-2.
4
Extent of recovery from the effects of visual deprivation in kittens.小猫视觉剥夺影响后的恢复程度。
J Neurophysiol. 1965 Nov;28(6):1060-72. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.6.1060.
5
The effect of age, complexity, and amount of contour on pattern preferences in human infants.年龄、复杂度和轮廓数量对人类婴儿图案偏好的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 1969 Apr;7(2):339-54. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(69)90055-1.
6
Effect of novel stimuli on cats reared in a restricted environment.新刺激对在受限环境中饲养的猫的影响。
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1970 Jan;70(1):157-64. doi: 10.1037/h0028405.
7
Visual perception from birth as shown by pattern selectivity.从出生起的视觉感知,如模式选择性所示。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1965 May 25;118(21):793-814. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1965.tb40152.x.
8
Severe deprivation in twins: a case study.双胞胎中的严重剥夺:一项案例研究。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1972 Jun;13(2):107-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1972.tb01124.x.
9
The visual response of the human newborn to linear contour.人类新生儿对线性轮廓的视觉反应。
J Exp Child Psychol. 1972 Feb;13(1):9-20. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(72)90003-3.
10
Do infants think?婴儿会思考吗?
Sci Am. 1972 Mar;226(3):74-82. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0372-74.