Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, 77550, Galveston, Texas.
J Youth Adolesc. 1978 Mar;7(1):63-72. doi: 10.1007/BF01538687.
The relationship between personality as embodied in the moral content of the Survey of Ethical Attitudes (SEA) and moral structure as measured by the Kohlberg Moral Judgment Interview (MJI) was investigated using 99 male college students. No relationship was found between scores on the SEA and Moral Maturity Scores on the MJI, although this finding was qualified by the fact that the MJI Scores for most students were restricted to Kohlberg's conventional range of morality. However, SEA scores were significantly correlated with the Moral Orientation scores obtained from the MJI. In contrast to scores on the SEA, scores on the MJI were significantly related to age. The problem of confusing content and structure in moral development research was explored. The theoretical implications of a personality component being involved in choice of moral orientation were discussed as well.
采用 99 名男大学生,考察了 Survey of Ethical Attitudes(SEA)中所体现的人格与 Kohlberg Moral Judgment Interview(MJI)所测量的道德结构之间的关系。SEA 的分数与 MJI 的道德成熟分数之间没有发现关系,尽管事实上大多数学生的 MJI 分数都局限于科勒伯格的传统道德范围,这一发现使结果变得复杂。然而,SEA 分数与从 MJI 获得的道德取向分数显著相关。与 SEA 分数相反,MJI 分数与年龄显著相关。探讨了道德发展研究中混淆内容和结构的问题。还讨论了人格成分参与道德取向选择的理论意义。