Wilmoth G H, McFarland S G
J Pers Assess. 1977 Aug;41(4):396-401. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4104_11.
Kohlberg's Moral Judgment Scale, Gilligan et al.'s Sexual Moral Judgment Scale, Maitland and Goldman's Objective Moral Judgment Scale, and Hogan's Maturity of Moral Judgment Scale, were examined for reliability and inter-scale relationships. All measures except the Objective Moral Judgment Scale had good reliabilities. The obtained relations between the Moral Judgment Scale and the Sexual Moral Judgment Scale replicated previous research. The Objective Moral Judgment Scale was not found to validly assess the Kohlberg stages. The Maturity of Moral Judgment Scale scores were strongly related to the subjects's classification on the Kohlberg stages, and the scale appears to offer a reliable, quickly scored, and valid index of mature thought, although the scale's continuous scores do not permit clear stage classification.
研究了科尔伯格道德判断量表、吉利根等人的性道德判断量表、梅特兰和戈德曼的客观道德判断量表以及霍根的道德判断成熟度量表的信度和量表间的关系。除客观道德判断量表外，所有测量方法的信度都很好。道德判断量表和性道德判断量表之间得到的关系重复了先前的研究。未发现客观道德判断量表能有效评估科尔伯格阶段。道德判断成熟度量表的得分与被试在科尔伯格阶段的分类密切相关，尽管该量表的连续得分不允许进行明确的阶段分类，但该量表似乎提供了一个可靠、计分快速且有效的成熟思维指标。
