Department of Psychology, State University of New York, College at Brockport, Brockport, New York.
J Youth Adolesc. 1975 Sep;4(3):195-205. doi: 10.1007/BF01537162.
This report is intended to clarify the relationship, observed in studies using Kohlberg's moral character model, between the character of college youth and their ideology. With a student sample, measures of three of Hogan's dimensions of moral character (moral judgment, socialization, and empathy) were correlated with sociopolitical ideology defined in terms of several indices of liberalismconservatism. Only the moral judgment dimension (ethics of social responsibility vs. ethics of personal conscience) as measured by Hogan 's Survey of Ethical Attitudes was related to ideology. These results indicate that in accordance with an ethics of responsibility, conservatives have a greater respect for the utility of rules in regulating human conduct and a greater tendency to attribute blame to the individual rather than the societal environment. The study provided no evidence to support conservative charges that radical youth possess delinquent predispositions or liberal and radical claims that conservatives are less concerned about the welfare of others.
本报告旨在澄清在使用科爾伯格的道德性格模型的研究中觀察到的大學生的性格與其思想意識之間的關係。本研究以學生為樣本,用 Hogan 的道德性格三個維度(道德判斷、社會化和同理心)的測量指標與用於定義自由主義-保守主義的幾個指標相關聯。只有 Hogan 的《道德態度調查》測量的道德判斷維度(社會責任倫理與個人良知倫理)與思想意識有關。這些結果表明,根據責任倫理,保守派更尊重規則在規範人類行為方面的效用,更傾向於將責任歸咎於個人而不是社會環境。該研究沒有提供證據支持保守派的指控,即激進青年具有犯罪傾向,也沒有支持自由派和激進派的說法,即保守派不太關心他人的福利。