Zhang Joy Yueyue
Soz Welt. 2010 Sep 1;61(3-4):255-274.
It is commonly perceived that the 'globalization of science' may result in a 'Westernization of science'. In this paper, however, I use the case of stem cell science in China to demonstrate that developing countries are sometimes able to effectively shape the norms of global/local scientific exchange. Based on interviews with 38 stem cell scientists in six Chinese cities in early 2008, this paper elucidates Chinese scientists' outlook towards cross-border collaborations and the effects that the internationalization of science has had on everyday laboratory operations. Findings suggest that although there still exists an asymmetry of scientific influence, and in many aspects China is still 'catching-up' to the West, there is also a changing nature of communication beyond borders. One key aspect of recent international scientific development is the growing necessity for local stakeholders to acquire a global mindset and to compare, reflect and accommodate diverse interests. This is what I define as the 'cosmopolitanization of science'. The study empirically examines the sociological and methodological implications of the cosmopolitanization process and further develops Ulrich Beck's cosmopolitan theory by delineating four main features of the 'cosmopolitanization of science': shared future benefits, passive ethicization, reflexive negotiation, and continuous performance.
人们普遍认为,“科学全球化”可能导致“科学西方化”。然而,在本文中,我以中国的干细胞科学为例,证明发展中国家有时能够有效地塑造全球/地方科学交流的规范。基于2008年初对中国六个城市的38位干细胞科学家的访谈,本文阐明了中国科学家对跨境合作的看法以及科学国际化对日常实验室操作产生的影响。研究结果表明,尽管科学影响力仍存在不对称性,而且在许多方面中国仍在追赶西方,但跨境交流的性质也在发生变化。近期国际科学发展的一个关键方面是,地方利益相关者越来越有必要形成全球视野,比较、反思并兼顾不同利益。这就是我所定义的“科学的世界主义化”。该研究实证考察了世界主义化过程的社会学和方法论意义,并通过阐述“科学的世界主义化”的四个主要特征:共享未来利益、被动伦理化、反思性协商和持续表现,进一步发展了乌尔里希·贝克的世界主义理论。