Suppr超能文献

不同支架对大鼠脂肪组织来源基质细胞的影响。

Effects of different scaffolds on rat adipose tissue derived stroma cells.

作者信息

Açil Yahya, Zhang Xiacong, Nitsche Tobias, Möller Björn, Gassling Volker, Wiltfang Jörg, Gierloff Matthias

机构信息

Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Christian-Albrechts-University, Arnold-Heller-Str. 16, 24105 Kiel, Germany.

Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Christian-Albrechts-University, Arnold-Heller-Str. 16, 24105 Kiel, Germany.

出版信息

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Sep;42(6):825-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.11.020. Epub 2013 Dec 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adipose tissue derived stroma cells (ASC's) offer for many advantages for tissue engineering strategies over mesenchymal stroma cells from other sources and ideal carrier materials have to be identified for them. The aim of this study was to demonstrate and to compare the effects of three clinically established biomaterials on proliferation and metabolic activity of rat ASC's in vitro.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Rat adipose tissue derived stroma cells (ASC's) were isolated and differentiated into distinct lineages proved by lineage specific staining and gene expression analysis (RT-PCR). The biomaterials Bio-Gide(®), Tutodent(®) Membrane and Belotero(®) Soft were tested with rat ASC's for their biocompatibility using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), cell vitality staining, cytotoxicity and proliferation tests (LDH, MTT, BrdU, WST-1).

RESULTS

The collagen membrane Bio-Gide(®) resulted in a significantly higher viability and proliferation (WST-1, BrdU) compared to Tutodent(®) Membrane. No significant difference was determined in the LDH and MTT test. The hyaluronic acid gel Belotero(®) Soft showed no cytotoxicity (LDH, FDA/PI) and had no negative effects on metabolic activity (WST-1, MTT) or cell proliferation (BrdU) of ASC's.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate Bio-Gide(®) and Belotero(®) Soft as preferable carrier materials for ASC's. For the further establishment of ASC's-based treatment strategies, in vivo investigations on the tissue regeneration potential of these cell-biomaterial scaffolds should follow.

摘要

背景

与其他来源的间充质基质细胞相比,脂肪组织来源的基质细胞(ASC)在组织工程策略方面具有许多优势,必须为其确定理想的载体材料。本研究的目的是证明并比较三种临床常用生物材料对大鼠ASC体外增殖和代谢活性的影响。

材料与方法

分离大鼠脂肪组织来源的基质细胞(ASC),并通过谱系特异性染色和基因表达分析(RT-PCR)证明其分化为不同谱系。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、细胞活力染色、细胞毒性和增殖试验(LDH、MTT、BrdU、WST-1),对生物材料Bio-Gide®、Tutodent®膜和Belotero® Soft与大鼠ASC进行生物相容性测试。

结果

与Tutodent®膜相比,胶原膜Bio-Gide®的活力和增殖(WST-1、BrdU)显著更高。在LDH和MTT试验中未发现显著差异。透明质酸凝胶Belotero® Soft无细胞毒性(LDH、FDA/PI),对ASC的代谢活性(WST-1、MTT)或细胞增殖(BrdU)无负面影响。

结论

我们的结果表明Bio-Gide®和Belotero® Soft是ASC的优选载体材料。为了进一步建立基于ASC的治疗策略,应随后对这些细胞-生物材料支架的组织再生潜力进行体内研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验